Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Semantic memory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Feature models=== Feature models view semantic categories as being composed of relatively unstructured sets of features. The [[semantic feature-comparison model]] describes memory as being composed of feature lists for different concepts.<ref name="Smith, E. E. 1974">{{cite journal | last1 = Smith | first1 = E. E. | last2 = Shoben | first2 = E. J. | last3 = Rips | first3 = L. J. | year = 1974 | title = Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions | journal = Psychological Review | volume = 81 | issue = 3| pages = 214β241 | doi=10.1037/h0036351}}</ref> According to this view, the relations between categories would not be directly retrieved, and would be indirectly computed instead. For example, subjects might verify a sentence by comparing the feature sets that represent its subject and predicate concepts. Such computational feature-comparison models include the ones proposed by Meyer (1970),<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Meyer | first1 = D. E. | year = 1970 | title = On the representation and retrieval of stored semantic information | journal = Cognitive Psychology | volume = 1 | issue = 3| pages = 242β299 | doi=10.1016/0010-0285(70)90017-4}}</ref> Rips (1975),<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Rips | first1 = L. J. | year = 1975 | title = Inductive judgments about natural categories | journal = Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior | volume = 14 | issue = 6| pages = 665β681 | doi=10.1016/s0022-5371(75)80055-7}}</ref> and Smith ''et al.'' (1974).<ref name="Smith, E. E. 1974"/> Early work in perceptual and conceptual categorization assumed that categories had critical features and that category membership could be determined by logical rules for the combination of features. More recent theories have accepted that categories may have an ill-defined or "fuzzy" structure<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = McCloskey | first1 = M. E. | last2 = Glucksberg | first2 = S. | year = 1978 | title = Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? | journal = Memory & Cognition | volume = 6 | issue = 4| pages = 462β472 | doi=10.3758/bf03197480| doi-access = free }}</ref> and have proposed probabilistic or global similarity models for the verification of category membership.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = McCloskey | first1 = M. | last2 = Glucksberg | first2 = S. | year = 1979 | title = Decision processes in verifying category membership statements: Implications for models of semantic memory | journal = Cognitive Psychology | volume = 11 | issue = 1| pages = 1β37 | doi=10.1016/0010-0285(79)90002-1| s2cid = 54313506 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)