Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Status quo bias
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Behavioral economics and the default position=== Against this background, two [[Behavioral economics|behavioral economists]] devised an opt-out plan to help employees of a particular company build their retirement savings. In an opt-out plan, the employees are automatically enrolled unless they explicitly ask to be excluded. They found evidence for status quo bias and other associated effects.<ref name="save more">{{cite journal|last=Thaler|first=Richard H.|author2=Shlomo Benartzi |title=Save More Tomorrow: Using Behavioural Economics to Increase Employee Saving|journal=Journal of Political Economy|year=2004|volume=112|pages=164β187|doi=10.1086/380085|citeseerx=10.1.1.495.8552|s2cid=2379566}}</ref> The impact of defaults on decision making due to status quo bias is not purely due to subconscious bias, as it has been found that even when disclosing the intent of the default to consumers, the effect of the default is not reduced.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Reisch|first1=Lucia A.|last2=Zhao|first2=Min|date=November 2017|title=Behavioural economics, consumer behaviour and consumer policy: state of the art|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398063X1700001X/type/journal_article|journal=Behavioural Public Policy|language=en|volume=1|issue=2|pages=190β206|doi=10.1017/bpp.2017.1|issn=2398-063X|hdl=10398/01e85b29-3d75-4be3-95dc-d256ad5dd947|s2cid=158160660|hdl-access=free}}</ref> An experiment conducted by Sen Geng, regarding status quo bias and decision time allocation, reveal that individuals allocate more attention to default options in comparison to alternatives. This is due to individuals who are mainly risk-averse who seek to attain greater expected utility and decreased subjective uncertainty in making their decision. Furthermore, by optimally allocating more time and asymmetric attention to default options or positions, the individual's estimate of the default's value is consequently more precise than estimates of alternatives. This behaviour thus reflects the individual's asymmetric choice error, and is therefore an indication of status quo bias.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Geng |first=Sen |title=Decision Time, Consideration Time, and Status Quo Bias |date=8 July 2015 |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.12239 |journal=Economic Inquiry |language=en |volume=54 |issue=1 |pages=433β449 |doi=10.1111/ecin.12239 |s2cid=153199766 |via=Wiley Online Library|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)