Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Sweating sickness
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Picardy sweat== [[File:Euricius cordus - englisch schweiss.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Title of a publication in [[Marburg]], 1529, about the English Sweating sickness]] Between 1718 and 1918 an illness with some similarities occurred in France, known as the [[Picardy sweat]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Foster|first=Michael G.|title=Contributions to Medical & Biological Research|chapter=Sweating Sickness in Modern Times|pages=52β53|volume=1|publisher=Paul B. Hoeber|location=New York|date=1919|chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/contributionstom01osleuoft|via=Internet Archive}}</ref> It was significantly less lethal than the English Sweat but with a strikingly high frequency of outbreaks; some 200 were recorded during the period.<ref name="Heyman 2014b"/> Llywelyn Roberts noted "a great similarity between the two diseases."<ref name="Roberts" /> There was intense sweating and fever, and Henry Tidy found "no substantial reason to doubt the identity of ''sudor anglicus'' and Picardy sweat."<ref name="Heyman2014" /><ref name="Tidy">{{cite journal| pmc=2059374 | pages=63β64 | volume=2 | issue=4410 | journal=Br Med J | title=Sweating Sickness and Picardy Sweat | year=945 | doi=10.1136/bmj.2.4410.63-a|last1 = Tidy|first1 = H.}}</ref> There were also notable differences between the Picardy sweat and the English sweating sickness. It was accompanied by a rash, which was not described as a feature of the English disease. Henry Tidy argued that John Caius's report applies to [[fulminant]] cases fatal within a few hours, in which case no eruption may develop. The Picardy sweat appears to have had a different epidemiology than the English sweat in that individuals who slept close to the ground and/or lived on farms appeared more susceptible, supporting the theory that the disease could be rodent-borne, common in hantaviruses.<ref name="Heyman 2014b"/> In a 1906 outbreak of Picardy sweat which struck 6,000 people, a commission led by bacteriologist [[AndrΓ© Chantemesse]] attributed infection to the fleas of field mice.{{cn|date=March 2025}} {{clear}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)