Editing Thematic Apperception Test (section)

==General interpretation==
Interpretation of the responses varies depending on the examiner and the type of scoring used. It is common that the standard scoring systems are used more in research settings than clinical settings. Individuals can select certain scoring systems if they have the goal to evaluate a specific variable such as motivation, defense mechanisms, achievement, problem-solving skills, etc. If a clinician selects not to use a scoring system, there are some general guidelines that can be utilized. For example, the stories created by the individuals in response to the TAT cards are a combination of three things: the card stimulus, the testing environment, and the personality of the examinee. For each card, the individual must subjectively interpret the pictures which involves the individual taking their own experiences and feelings to create a story. Therefore, it is beneficial to look at the common themes in the stories' content and structure to help make conclusions.<ref name="practical">{{cite book |author=Aronow, E. |author2=Weiss, K. A. |author3=Rezinkoff, M. |date=2001 |title=A Practical Guide to the Thematic Apperception Test |location=Philadelphia |publisher=Brunner Routledge}}</ref> Murray states that in the stories built by the person being evaluated there is a hero with whom the subject identifies and to whom he attributes his own motivations. However, there are the characters that interact with this hero, and represent the real social and family environment of the person.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Heredia |first1=Liliana |title=Test TAT: ¿Qué revelan las 31 láminas sobre la personalidad? |url=https://psicologoscordoba.org/test-tat-que-revelan-las-31-laminas-sobre-la-personalidad/ |website=Psicólogos Córdoba |date=October 2019 |access-date=2020-08-26 |archive-date=2020-08-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809173525/https://psicologoscordoba.org/test-tat-que-revelan-las-31-laminas-sobre-la-personalidad/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

With interpretation of the responses, it is important for the clinician to consider some cautions to verify the information is as accurate as possible. First, the examiner should always be conservative when interpreting responses. It is important to always err on the side of caution instead of making bold conclusions. The examiner should also consider all the data when using the TAT in a testing or evaluative setting. One response should not be given more importance over the other responses. Additionally, the examiner should take the individual's developmental status and cultural background into consideration when examining responses. All of these cautions should be considered when an examiner is using the TAT.<ref name="practical"/>