Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Analytic continuation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Example II: A typical lacunary series (natural boundary as subsets of the unit circle)=== For integers <math>c \geq 2</math>, we define the [[lacunary series]] of order ''c'' by the power series expansion :<math>\mathcal{L}_c(z) := \sum_{n \geq 1} z^{c^n}, |z| < 1.</math> Clearly, since <math>c^{n+1} = c \cdot c^{n}</math> there is a functional equation for <math>\mathcal{L}_c(z)</math> for any ''z'' satisfying <math>|z| < 1</math> given by <math>\mathcal{L}_c(z) = z^{c} + \mathcal{L}_c(z^c)</math>. It is also not difficult to see that for any integer <math>m \geq 1</math>, we have another functional equation for <math>\mathcal{L}_c(z)</math> given by :<math>\mathcal{L}_c(z) = \sum_{i=0}^{m-1} z^{c^{i}} + \mathcal{L}_c(z^{c^m}), \forall |z| < 1.</math> For any positive natural numbers ''c'', the lacunary series function diverges at <math>z = 1</math>. We consider the question of analytic continuation of <math>\mathcal{L}_c(z)</math> to other complex ''z'' such that <math>|z| > 1.</math> As we shall see, for any <math>n \geq 1</math>, the function <math>\mathcal{L}_c(z)</math> diverges at the <math>c^{n}</math>-th roots of unity. Hence, since the set formed by all such roots is dense on the boundary of the unit circle, there is no analytic continuation of <math>\mathcal{L}_c(z)</math> to complex ''z'' whose modulus exceeds one. The proof of this fact is generalized from a standard argument for the case where <math>c := 2.</math><ref>See the example given on the ''MathWorld'' page for [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NaturalBoundary.html natural boundary].</ref> Namely, for integers <math>n \geq 1</math>, let :<math>\mathcal{R}_{c,n} := \left \{z \in \mathbb{D} \cup \partial{\mathbb{D}}: z^{c^n} = 1 \right \},</math> where <math>\mathbb{D}</math> denotes the open [[unit disk]] in the complex plane and <math>|\mathcal{R}_{c,n} | = c^n</math>, i.e., there are <math>c^n</math> distinct [[complex number]]s ''z'' that lie on or inside the unit circle such that <math>z^{c^n} = 1</math>. Now the key part of the proof is to use the functional equation for <math>\mathcal{L}_c(z)</math> when <math>|z| < 1</math> to show that :<math>\forall z \in \mathcal{R}_{c,n}, \qquad \mathcal{L}_c(z) = \sum_{i=0}^{c^n-1} z^{c^i} + \mathcal{L}_c(z^{c^n}) = \sum_{i=0}^{c^n-1} z^{c^i} + \mathcal{L}_c(1) = +\infty.</math> Thus for any arc on the boundary of the unit circle, there are an infinite number of points ''z'' within this arc such that <math>\mathcal{L}_c(z) = \infty</math>. This condition is equivalent to saying that the circle <math>C_1 := \{z: |z| = 1\}</math> forms a natural boundary for the function <math>\mathcal{L}_c(z)</math> for any fixed choice of <math>c \in \Z \quad c > 1.</math> Hence, there is no analytic continuation for these functions beyond the interior of the unit circle.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)