Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Bringing Up Baby
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=={{anchor|Reception}}Reception== ===Critical response=== [[File:BabyPoster2.jpg|thumb|upright=1.6|[[Lobby card]]]] The film received good advance reviews, with [[Otis Ferguson]] of ''[[The New Republic]]'' writing the film was very funny, and praising Hawks's direction.{{sfn|Mast|1988|p=268}} ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' also praised the film, singling out Hawks' pacing and direction, calling Hepburn's performance "one of her most invigorating screen characterizations" and saying Grant "performs his role to the hilt";{{sfn|Mast|1988|p=266}} their only criticism was the length of the jail scene.{{sfn|Mast|1988|p=267}} ''[[Film Daily]]'' called it "literally a riot from beginning to end, with the laugh total heavy and the action fast."<ref>{{cite journal |date=February 11, 1938 |title=Reviews of the New Films |journal=[[Film Daily]] |page=12}}</ref> ''[[Harrison's Reports]]'' called the film "An excellent farce" with "many situations that provoke hearty laughter,"<ref>{{cite journal |date=February 19, 1938 |title=Bringing Up Baby |journal=[[Harrison's Reports]] |page=31}}</ref> and [[John Mosher (writer)|John Mosher]] of ''[[The New Yorker]]'' wrote that both stars "manage to be funny" and that Hepburn had never "seemed so good-natured."<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Mosher |first=John |author-link=John Mosher (writer) |date=March 5, 1938 |title=The Current Cinema |magazine=[[The New Yorker]] |pages=61β62}}</ref> However, [[Frank S. Nugent]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' disliked the film, considering it derivative and clichΓ©-ridden, a rehash of dozens of other screwball comedies of the period. He labeled Hepburn's performance "breathless, senseless, and terribly, terribly fatiguing",{{sfn|Mast|1988|p=265}} and added, "If you've never been to the movies, ''Bringing Up Baby'' will be new to you β a zany-ridden product of the goofy-farce school. But who hasn't been to the movies?"{{sfn|Laham|2009|p=29}} On review aggregator [[Rotten Tomatoes]], the film holds an approval rating of 97% based on 68 reviews, with an average rating of 9/10. The site's critical consensus reads: "With Katharine Hepburn and Cary Grant at their effervescent best, ''Bringing Up Baby'' is a seamlessly assembled comedy with enduring appeal."<ref>{{cite web | title=Bringing Up Baby (1938) | url= https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bringing_up_baby | work=[[Rotten Tomatoes]] | access-date=July 26, 2023}}</ref> On [[Metacritic]], the film holds a weighted average score of 91 out of 100, based on 17 critics, indicating "universal acclaim".<ref>{{cite web | title=Bringing Up Baby reviews| url= https://www.metacritic.com/movie/bringing-up-baby?ftag=MCD-06-10aaa0e | work=[[Metacritic]] | access-date=June 3, 2020}}</ref> ===Box office=== Despite ''Bringing Up Baby''{{-'}}s reputation as a flop, it was successful in some parts of the U.S. The film premiered on February 16, 1938, at the [[Golden Gate Theatre]] in [[San Francisco]] (where it was a hit), and was also successful in [[Los Angeles]], [[Portland, Oregon|Portland]], [[Denver]], [[Cincinnati]] and [[Washington, D.C.]] However, it was a financial disappointment in the Midwest, as well as most other cities in the country, including NYC; to RKO's chagrin, the film's premiere in [[New York City|New York]] on March 3, 1938, at [[Radio City Music Hall]] made only $70,000 and it was pulled after one week{{sfn|McCarthy|1997|p=255}} in favor of ''[[Jezebel (1938 film)|Jezebel]]'' with [[Bette Davis]].{{sfn|Brown|1995|p=140}} During its first run, ''Bringing Up Baby'' made $715,000 in the U.S. and $394,000 in foreign markets for a total of $1,109,000;{{sfn|Mast|1988|p=14}} its reissue in 1940 and 1941 made an additional $95,000 in the US and $55,000 in foreign markets.{{sfn|McCarthy|1997|p=255}} Following its second run, the film made a profit of $163,000.{{sfn|Mast|1988|p=14}} Due to its perceived failure, Hawks was released early from his two-film contract with RKO{{sfn|Mast|1988|p=14}} and ''[[Gunga Din (film)|Gunga Din]]'' was eventually directed by [[George Stevens]].{{sfn|McCarthy|1997|p=257}} Hawks later said the film "had a great fault and I learned an awful lot from that. There were ''no'' normal people in it. Everyone you met was a screwball and since that time I learned my lesson and don't intend ever again to make everybody crazy."{{sfn|McCarthy|1997|p=256}} The director went on to work with RKO on three films over the next decade.{{sfn|Mast|1988|p=16}} Long before ''Bringing Up Baby''{{-'}}s release, Hepburn had been branded "[[Box Office Poison (magazine article)|box office poison]]" by Harry Brandt (president of the Independent Theatre Owners of America) and thus was allowed to buy out her RKO contract for $22,000.{{sfn|Eliot|2004|pp=180β1}}{{sfn|McCarthy|1997|pp=255β7}} However, many critics marveled at her new skill at [[low comedy]]; [[Life magazine|''Life'' magazine]] called her "the surprise of the picture".{{sfn|Mast|1988|p=15}} Hepburn's former boyfriend Howard Hughes bought RKO in 1948, and sold it in 1955; when he sold the company, Hughes retained the copyright to six films (including ''Bringing Up Baby'').{{sfn|Mast|1988|p=16}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)