Editing Cash-for-questions affair (section)

== Riddick and Treddinick ==
Though the term "cash for questions affair" is used to refer to the events that followed the publication of ''The Guardian'''s story, it was not the first time that a British newspaper had accused MPs of taking bribes to table questions.  Three months earlier, in July 1994, a 'sting' operation by [[The Sunday Times (UK)|''The Sunday Times'']] reported that two Conservative MPs [[Graham Riddick]] and [[David Tredinnick (politician)|David Treddinick]] had accepted cheques for £1,000 for agreeing to table a parliamentary question.<ref>[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/cashforquestions-mps-suspended-by-commons-1616440.html Cash-for-questions MPs suspended by Commons] (retrieved 25 February 2015)</ref>

The two were suspended from parliament for 10 and 20 days respectively, Mr Riddick receiving a shorter 'sentence' due to his apparent decision to apologise quickly and return his cheque bribe.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080228151900/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19950421/ai_n13978206 Cash-for-questions MPs suspended by Commons]</ref>

Riddick lodged a formal complaint with the [[Press Complaints Commission]] (PCC). Basing its decisions on the information compiled by the Commons' Privileges Committee the PCC found in Riddick's favour. The commission judged that ''The Sunday Times'' failed to make clear to its readers that its approach to Riddick had been on the basis of a legitimate consultancy, not on the basis of a one-off payment in return for asking a question and that there was no justification for the newspaper's resort to subterfuge.  This overturned a ruling two years earlier by the PCC in favour of ''The Sunday Times'' when Riddick had been unaware that the PCC was investigating the matter.  The PCC apologised to Riddick for 'this serious breach of our procedures.'<ref>Huddersfield Examiner, 27 March 1996</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199495/cmhansrd/1995-04-20/Debate-4.html |title=Column 371 |work=Hansard |date=20 April 1995 |accessdate=8 March 2010 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605021756/http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199495/cmhansrd/1995-04-20/Debate-4.html |archivedate=5 June 2011 }}</ref>