Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Commutator
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Adjoint derivation == Especially if one deals with multiple commutators in a ring ''R'', another notation turns out to be useful. For an element <math>x\in R</math>, we define the [[adjoint representation of a Lie algebra|adjoint]] mapping <math>\mathrm{ad}_x:R\to R</math> by: : <math>\operatorname{ad}_x(y) = [x, y] = xy-yx.</math> This mapping is a [[Derivation (differential algebra)|derivation]] on the ring ''R'': : <math>\mathrm{ad}_x\!(yz) \ =\ \mathrm{ad}_x\!(y) \,z \,+\, y\,\mathrm{ad}_x\!(z).</math> By the [[Jacobi identity]], it is also a derivation over the commutation operation: : <math>\mathrm{ad}_x[y,z] \ =\ [\mathrm{ad}_x\!(y),z] \,+\, [y,\mathrm{ad}_x\!(z)] .</math> Composing such mappings, we get for example <math>\operatorname{ad}_x\operatorname{ad}_y(z) = [x, [y, z]\,] </math> and <math display="block">\operatorname{ad}_x^2\!(z) \ =\ \operatorname{ad}_x\!(\operatorname{ad}_x\!(z)) \ =\ [x, [x, z]\,].</math> We may consider <math>\mathrm{ad}</math> itself as a mapping, <math>\mathrm{ad}: R \to \mathrm{End}(R) </math>, where <math>\mathrm{End}(R)</math> is the ring of mappings from ''R'' to itself with composition as the multiplication operation. Then <math>\mathrm{ad}</math> is a [[Lie algebra]] homomorphism, preserving the commutator: : <math>\operatorname{ad}_{[x, y]} = \left[ \operatorname{ad}_x, \operatorname{ad}_y \right].</math> By contrast, it is '''not''' always a ring homomorphism: usually <math>\operatorname{ad}_{xy} \,\neq\, \operatorname{ad}_x\operatorname{ad}_y </math>. === General Leibniz rule === The [[general Leibniz rule]], expanding repeated derivatives of a product, can be written abstractly using the adjoint representation: : <math>x^n y = \sum_{k = 0}^n \binom{n}{k} \operatorname{ad}_x^k\!(y)\, x^{n - k}.</math> Replacing <math>x</math> by the differentiation operator <math>\partial</math>, and <math>y</math> by the multiplication operator <math>m_f : g \mapsto fg</math>, we get <math>\operatorname{ad}(\partial)(m_f) = m_{\partial(f)}</math>, and applying both sides to a function ''g'', the identity becomes the usual Leibniz rule for the ''n''th derivative <math>\partial^{n}\!(fg)</math>.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)