Editing Discounted cash flow (section)

===Entity-approach===
* [[Adjusted present value]] approach (APV)
** Discount the cash flows before allowing for the debt capital (but allowing for the tax relief obtained on the debt capital)
** Advantages: Simpler to apply if a specific project is being valued which does not have earmarked debt capital finance
** Disadvantages: Requires judgement on choice of discount rate; no explicit allowance for cost of debt capital, which may be much higher than a [[risk-free rate]]
* [[Weighted average cost of capital]] approach (WACC)
** Derive a weighted cost of the capital obtained from the various sources and use that discount rate to discount the unlevered free cash flows from the project
** Advantages: Overcomes the requirement for debt capital finance to be earmarked to particular projects
** Disadvantages: Care must be exercised in the selection of the appropriate income stream. The net cash flow to total invested capital is the generally accepted choice.
* [[Total cash flow]] approach (TCF){{Clarify|date=February 2009}}
** This distinction illustrates that the Discounted Cash Flow method can be used to determine the value of various business ownership interests. These can include equity or debt holders.
** Alternatively, the method can be used to value the company based on the value of total invested capital. In each case, the differences lie in the choice of the income stream and discount rate. For example, the net cash flow to total invested capital and WACC are appropriate when valuing a company based on the market value of all invested capital.<ref>{{cite book
  | last = Pratt | first = Shannon |author2=Robert F. Reilly|author3=Robert P. Schweihs  | title = Valuing a Business | publisher = McGraw Hill | series = McGraw-Hill Professional  | year = 2000  | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=WO6wd8O8dsUC&q=shannon+pratt  | isbn = 0-07-135615-0 }}
</ref>