Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Elsevier
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Blocking text mining research === Elsevier seeks to regulate [[text and data mining]] with private licenses,<ref name=nature527413f/> claiming that reading requires extra permission if automated and that the publisher holds copyright on [[threshold of originality|output of automated processes]]. The conflict on research and copyright policy has often resulted in researchers being blocked from their work.<ref>{{cite journal|first1=Richard|last1=Van Noorden|title=Elsevier opens its papers to text-mining|journal=Nature|date=3 February 2014|issn=0028-0836|pages=17|volume=506|issue=7486|doi=10.1038/506017a|pmid=24499898|doi-access=free|quote="It was a legitimate criticism, that people sent text-mining requests in to publishers and they bounced around for a time without any response", admits Chris Shillum, vice-president of product management for platform and content at Elsevier.|bibcode=2014Natur.506...17V}}</ref> In November 2015, Elsevier blocked a scientist from performing [[text mining]] research at scale on Elsevier papers, even though his institution already pays for access to Elsevier journal content.<ref name="nature527413f">{{cite journal|last1=Bloudoff-Indelicato|first1=Mollie|title=Text-mining block prompts online response|journal=Nature|date=20 November 2015|volume=527|issue=7579|pages=413|doi=10.1038/527413f|bibcode=2015Natur.527..413B|s2cid=4457698|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Moody|first1=Glyn|title=Elsevier Says Downloading And Content-Mining Licensed Copies Of Research Papers 'Could Be Considered' Stealing|url=https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20151117/09383132839/elsevier-says-downloading-content-mining-licensed-copies-research-papers-could-be-considered-stealing.shtml|website=TechDirt|date=18 November 2015|access-date=21 November 2015|archive-date=21 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151121235758/https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20151117/09383132839/elsevier-says-downloading-content-mining-licensed-copies-research-papers-could-be-considered-stealing.shtml|url-status=live}}</ref> The data was collected using the [[R (programming language)|R]] package "statcheck".<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Nuijten|first1=Michèle B.|last2=Hartgerink|first2=Chris H. J.|last3=van Assen|first3=Marcel A. L. M.|last4=Epskamp|first4=Sacha|last5=Wicherts|first5=Jelte M.|title=The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)|journal=Behavior Research Methods|date=23 October 2015|volume=48|issue=4|pages=1205–1226|doi=10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2|pmid=26497820|pmc=5101263}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)