Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Inverse problem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Numerical solution of our elementary example ==== Here we make use of the Euclidean norm to quantify the data misfits. As we deal with a linear inverse problem, the objective function is quadratic. For its minimization, it is classical to compute its gradient using the same rationale (as we would to minimize a function of only one variable). At the optimal model <math>p_\text{opt}</math>, this gradient vanishes which can be written as: <math display="block">\nabla_p \varphi = 2 (F^\mathrm{T} F p_\text{opt} - F^\mathrm{T} d_\text{obs}) = 0 </math> where ''F''<sup>T</sup> denotes the [[matrix transpose]] of ''F''. This equation simplifies to: <math display="block">F^\mathrm{T} F p_\text{opt} = F^\mathrm{T} d_\text{obs} </math> This expression is known as the [https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Normal_equations&redirect=no normal equation] and gives us a possible solution to the inverse problem. In our example matrix <math>F^\mathrm{T} F</math> turns out to be generally full rank so that the equation above makes sense and determines uniquely the model parameters: we do not need integrating additional information for ending up with a unique solution.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)