Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Obligation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Primary and secondary === [[English law]] distinguishes in some case law between primary and secondary obligations. A secondary obligation, also known as an accessory obligation, is a duty that is incidental to a primary obligation.<ref>{{cite book |editor1-last=Garner |editor1-first=Bryan A. |title=Black's law dictionary |date=2009 |publisher=West |location=St. Paul, MN |isbn=978-0314199492 |page=1180 |edition=9th}}</ref> A duty to perform a secondary obligation may result, for example, as a result of their [[breach of contract|breach]] of a primary obligation, or by another party breaching an obligation that the secondary obligor has [[guarantee]]d. The [[England and Wales Court of Appeal]] noted in the case of AB v CD (2014) that{{blockquote|The primary obligation of the party to a contract [is] to perform his contractual obligations. The obligation to pay [[damages]] in the event of breach is a secondary obligation.<ref>Blake, N., [https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2014/03/11/court-of-appeal-decision-means-injunction-to-prevent-breach-may-be-more-readily-obtained-where-damages-limited-by-contract/ Court of Appeal decision means injunction to prevent breach may be more readily obtained where damages limited by contract], ''Herbert Smith Freehills'': Litigation Notes, published 11 March 2014, accessed 7 February 2023</ref><ref>England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), [https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/229.html AB v CD (2014) EWCA Civ 229], paragraph 22, published 6 March 2014, accessed 2 February 2023</ref>}} and in relation to the [[Statute of Frauds]], [[Maurice Kay|Lord Justice Maurice Kay]] commented in 2009 that{{blockquote|A guarantee is, in the words of the Statute, a promise "to answer for the debt default or miscarriage of another person". There must be another person who is primarily liable. The liability of the guarantor is secondary.<ref>England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), [https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/189.html Associated British Ports v Ferryways NV & Anor], EWCA Civ 189, 18 March 2009, accessed 18 February 2023</ref>}} The Appeal Court observed in 1973 that the determination of whether a document is a guarantee or an indemnity, or whether it imposes a secondary or a primary liability, will always depend upon "the true [[judicial interpretation|construction]] of the actual words in which the promise is expressed".<ref>Swarbrick, D., [https://swarb.co.uk/lep-air-services-v-rolloswin-investments-ltd-moschi-v-lep-air-services-hl-1973/ Lep Air Services v Rolloswin Investments Ltd; Moschi v LEP Air Services: HL 1973], updated 6 May 2022, accessed 18 February 2023</ref> Under the [[Louisiana Civil Code]], "stipulated damages" create a secondary obligation for the purpose of enforcing a principal obligation. An aggrieved party may demand either the stipulated damages or the performance of the principal obligation, but may not demand both except for delay.<ref>Louisiana Civil Code, [http://legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?d=109263 Article 2007], accessed 23 June 2015</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)