Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Parlement
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Abolition== [[File:Suppression des Parlements.jpg|thumb|''The Abolition of the Parliaments'', 1790 print]] The parlements were abolished by the [[National Constituent Assembly (France)|National Constituent Assembly]] on 6 September 1790. The behavior of the parlements is one of the reasons that since the [[French Revolution]], French courts have been forbidden by Article 5 of the [[Napoleonic code|French civil code]] to create law and act as legislative bodies, their only mandate being to interpret the law. France, through the Napoleonic Code, was at the origin of the modern system of [[civil law (legal system)|civil law]], in which precedents are not as powerful as in countries of [[common law]]. The origin of the separation of powers in the French court system, with no [[stare decisis|rule of precedent]] outside the interpretation of the law, no single supreme court and no constitutional review of statutes by courts until 1971 (by action, before the [[Constitutional Council of France]] created in 1958) and 2010 (by exception, before any court)<ref>The control of conventionality according to the [[European Convention on Human Rights]] was introduced in 1975 and 1989, respectively for judiciary and administrative courts.</ref> is usually traced to that hostility towards "government by judges".<ref>Michael H. Davis, ''The Law/Politics Distinction, the French Conseil Constitutionnel, and the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U. S. Supreme Court]]'', The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 34, No. 1 (Winter, 1986), [https://www.jstor.org/stable/840292 pp. 45β92]</ref><ref>James Beardsley, ''Constitutional Review in France'', The Supreme Court Review, Vol. 1975, (1975), [https://www.jstor.org/stable/3108812 pp. 189-259]</ref><ref>Denis Tallon, John N. Hazard, George A. Bermann, ''The Constitution and the Courts in France'', The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 27, No. 4 (Autumn, 1979), [https://www.jstor.org/stable/839794 pp. 567β587]</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)