Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Prime ideal
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Important facts== *'''[[Prime avoidance lemma]].''' If {{mvar|R}} is a commutative ring, and {{mvar|A}} is a [[subring]] (possibly without unity), and {{math|''I''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''I<sub>n</sub>''}} is a collection of ideals of {{mvar|R}} with at most two members not prime, then if {{mvar|A}} is not contained in any {{math|''I<sub>j</sub>''}}, it is also not contained in the [[union (set theory)|union]] of {{math|''I''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''I<sub>n</sub>''}}.<ref>Jacobson ''Basic Algebra II'', p. 390</ref> In particular, {{mvar|A}} could be an ideal of {{mvar|R}}. * If {{mvar|S}} is any m-system in {{mvar|R}}, then a lemma essentially due to Krull shows that there exists an ideal {{mvar|I}} of {{mvar|R}} maximal with respect to being disjoint from {{mvar|S}}, and moreover the ideal {{mvar|I}} must be prime (the primality {{mvar|I}} can be [[mathematical proof|proved]] as follows: if <math>a, b\not\in I</math>, then there exist elements <math>s, t\in S</math> such that <math>s\in I+(a), t\in I+(b)</math> by the maximal property of {{mvar|I}}. Now, if <math>(a)(b)\subset I</math>, then <math>st\in (I+(a))(I+(b))\subset I+(a)(b)\subset I</math>, which is a contradiction).<ref name="Lam"/> In the case {{math|''S'' {{=}} {1},}} we have [[Krull's theorem]], and this recovers the maximal ideals of {{mvar|R}}. Another prototypical m-system is the set, {{math|{''x'', ''x''<sup>2</sup>, ''x''<sup>3</sup>, ''x''<sup>4</sup>, ...},}} of all positive powers of a non-[[nilpotent]] element. * For a prime ideal {{mvar|P}}, the complement {{math|''R''β''P''}} has another property beyond being an m-system. If ''xy'' is in {{math|''R''β''P''}}, then both {{mvar|x}} and {{mvar|y}} must be in {{math|''R''β''P''}}, since {{mvar|P}} is an ideal. A set that contains the divisors of its elements is called '''saturated'''. * For a commutative ring {{mvar|R}}, there is a kind of converse for the previous statement: If {{mvar|S}} is any nonempty saturated and multiplicatively closed subset of {{mvar|R}}, the complement {{math|''R''β''S''}} is a union of prime ideals of {{mvar|R}}.<ref>Kaplansky ''Commutative rings'', p. 2</ref> *The [[intersection (set theory)|intersection]] of members of a descending chain of prime ideals is a prime ideal, and in a commutative ring the union of members of an ascending chain of prime ideals is a prime ideal. With [[Zorn's Lemma]], these observations imply that the poset of prime ideals of a commutative ring (partially ordered by inclusion) has maximal and minimal elements.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)