Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Procopius
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Style== Procopius belongs to the school of [[late antiquity|late antique]] historians who continued the traditions of the [[Second Sophistic]]. They wrote in [[Attic dialect|Attic Greek]]. Their models were [[Herodotus]], [[Polybius]] and in particular [[Thucydides]]. Their subject matter was secular history. They avoided vocabulary unknown to Attic Greek and inserted an explanation when they had to use contemporary words. Thus Procopius includes glosses of monks ("the most temperate of Christians") and churches (as equivalent to a "temple" or "shrine"), since monasticism was unknown to the ancient Athenians and their ''ekklesía'' had been [[Ecclesia (ancient Athens)|a popular assembly]].<ref>''Wars'', 2.9.14 and 1.7.22.</ref> The secular historians eschewed the history of the Christian church. Ecclesiastical history was left to a separate genre after [[Eusebius of Caesarea|Eusebius]]. [[Averil Cameron|Cameron]] has argued that Procopius's works reflect the tensions between the classical and Christian models of history in 6th-century Constantinople. This has been supported by [[Mary Whitby|Whitby]]'s analysis of Procopius's depiction of the capital and [[Hagia Sophia|its cathedral]] in comparison to contemporary pagan panegyrics.<ref>''Buildings'', Book I.</ref> Procopius can be seen as depicting Justinian as essentially God's [[vicegerent]], making the case for buildings being a primarily religious panegyric.<ref>Whitby, Mary: "Procopius' ''Buildings'' Book I: A Panegyrical Perspective", in ''Antiquité Tardive'' 8 (2000), 45–57.</ref> Procopius indicates that he planned to write an ecclesiastical history himself<ref>''Secret History'', 26.18.</ref> and, if he had, he would probably have followed the rules of that genre. As far as known, however, such an ecclesiastical history was never written. Some historians have criticized Propocius's description of some barbarians, for example, he dehumanized the unfamiliar Moors as "not even properly human". This was however, inline with Byzantine ethnographic practice in late antiquity.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/859162344 |title=Ethnography after antiquity : foreign lands and peoples in Byzantine literature |date=2013 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |isbn=978-0-8122-0840-5 |page=10 |location=Philadelphia |oclc=859162344}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)