Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Protoscience
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Protoscience examples== ===Physical science=== * Ancient astronomical protoscience was recorded as astronomical images and records inscribed on stones, bones and cave walls.{{sfn|Owens|2014}} * Luigi Ferdinando Marsili (1658β1730) contributed to protoscience [[oceanography]], describing the ocean currents of the [[Bosporus]] and [[physical oceanography]], and [[Benjamin Franklin]] contributed by identifying the currents of the [[Gulf Stream]].{{sfn|Owens|2014}} * Philosophers consider [[physics]] before [[Galileo Galilei|Galileo]] and [[Christiaan Huygens|Huygens]], [[chemistry]] before [[Antoine Lavoisier|Lavoisier]], medicine before [[Rudolf Virchow|Virchow]] and [[Claude Bernard|Bernard]], [[electricity]] before the mid-eighteenth century, and the study of [[heredity]] and [[Phylogenetics|phylogeny]] before the mid-nineteenth century as protosciences that eventually became established science.{{sfn|Bunge|2010|p=253}}{{sfn|Kuhn|1970|p=244}} * Prior to 1905, leading scientists, [[Wilhelm Ostwald|Ostwald]] and [[Ernst Mach|Mach]], viewed atomic and molecular-kinetic theory as a protoscience, a theory indirectly supported by [[chemistry]] and [[Thermodynamics|statistical thermodynamics]]; however, [[Albert Einstein|Einstein's]] theory of [[Brownian motion]], and [[Jean Baptiste Perrin|Perrin's]] experimental verification led to widespread acceptance of atomic and molecular-kinetic theory as established science.{{sfn|Bunge|2010|p=253}}{{sfn|Newburgh|Peidle|Rueckner|2006}} * The early stage of [[plate tectonics]], beginning with [[Alfred Wegener|Wegener's]] theory of [[continental drift]], was a protoscience until experimental research confirmed the theory many years later.{{sfn|Tuomela|1987|p=100}} The initial widespread rejection of Wegener's theory is an example of the importance of not dismissing a protoscience.{{sfn|Tuomela|1987|p=100}}{{sfn|Oreskes|Le Grand|2001|p=7}} ===Psychology=== Critics state that [[psychology]] is a protoscience because some practices occur that prevent falsification of research hypotheses.{{sfn|Heene|Ferguson|2017|p=37}} <em>[[Folk psychology]]</em> and <em>coaching psychology</em> are protosciences.{{sfn|Sehon|1997}}{{sfn|Grant|Cavanagh|2007}} ===Medicine=== The use of scientifically invalid [[Biomarker (medicine)|biomarkers]] to identify adverse outcomes is a protoscience practice in medicine.{{sfn|Grimes|Schulz|Raymond|2010}} The process for reporting adverse medical events is a protoscience because it relies on uncorroborated data and unsystematic methods.{{sfn|Kaplan|Barach|2002}} ===Technology=== Hatleback describes [[Computer security|cybersecurity]] as a protoscience that lacks transparency in experimentation, scientific laws, and sound experimental design in some cases; however cybersecurity has the potential to become a science.{{sfn|Hatleback|2018}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)