Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Question
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Polar questions === Different languages may use different mechanisms to distinguish polar ("yes-no") questions from declarative statements (in addition to the [[question mark]]). English is one of a small number of languages which use word order. Another example is French: {| class="wikitable" |+ ! !French !Translation |- !Declarative |''Vous avez tué un oiseau.'' |You have killed a bird. |- ! Polar question |''Avez-vous tué un oiseau?'' |Have you killed a bird? |} Cross-linguistically, the most common method of marking a polar question is with an [[interrogative particle]],<ref name="WALS-polar">{{cite web|title=Chapter 116: Polar Questions|url=http://wals.info/chapter/116|work=World Atlas of Language Structures|access-date=15 April 2021}}</ref> such as the [[Japanese language|Japanese]] {{lang|ja|か}} ''ka'', [[Standard Mandarin|Mandarin]] {{lang|zh|吗}} ''ma'' and [[Polish grammar|Polish]] ''czy''. Other languages use verbal morphology, such as the ''-n'' verbal postfix in the [[Tunica language]]. Of the languages examined in the [[World Atlas of Language Structures]], only one, [[Atatláhuca–San Miguel Mixtec]], was found to have no distinction between declaratives and polar questions.<ref name="WALS-polar"/> ==== Intonation ==== Most languages have an intonational pattern which is characteristic of questions (often involving a raised pitch at the end, as in English). In some languages, such as [[Italian grammar|Italian]], intonation is the sole distinction.{{citation needed|date=June 2021}} In some languages, such as English, or Russian, a [[rising declarative]] is a sentence which is syntactically declarative but is understood as a question by the use of a rising intonation. For example, "You're not using this?" On the other hand, there are English dialects (Southern Californian English, New Zealand English) in which rising declaratives (the "[[uptalk]]") do not constitute questions.<ref>[[Paul Warren (professor)|Paul Warren]]<!--https://people.wgtn.ac.nz/Paul.Warren--> (2017) "The interpretation of prosodic variability in the context of accompanying sociophonetic cues", Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 11. {{doi|10.5334/labphon.92}} (Paper presented at the Third Experimental and Theoretical Approaches to Prosody workshop) * More on uptalk of this author: Paul Warren, ''Uptalk: the phenomenon of rising intonation'', Cambridge University Press. 2016, {{ISBN|978-1107123854}} (hardcover), ([https://www.amazon.com/Uptalk-Phenomenon-Intonation-Paul-Warren-ebook/dp/B017205HLC kindle edition])</ref> However it is established that in English [[Rising declarative|there is a distinction]] between ''assertive'' rising declaratives and ''inquisitive'' rising declaratives, distinguished by their [[prosody (linguistics)|prosody]]. ==== Request for confirmation and speaker presupposition ==== Questions may be phrased as a request for confirmation for a statement the interrogator already believes to be true. A [[tag question]] is a polar question formed by the addition of an interrogative fragment (the "tag") to a (typically declarative) clause. For example: :You're John, {{underline|aren't you?}} :Let's have a drink, {{underline|shall we?}} :You remembered the eggs, {{underline|right?}} This form may incorporate speaker's [[presupposition]] when it constitutes a [[complex question]]. Consider a statement :(A) Somebody killed the cat and several questions related to it. :(B) John killed the cat, did he? (tag question) :(C) Was it John who killed the cat? As compared with: :(D) Who killed the cat? Unlike (B), questions (C) and (D) incorporate a presupposition that somebody killed the cat. Question (C) indicates speaker's commitment to the truth of the statement that somebody killed the cat, but no commitment as to whether John did it or did not.<ref name="saltpet">[[Stanley Peters]], "Speaker commitments: Presupposition", ''Proceedings of the Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT)'' 26: 1083–1098, 2016, ([https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/article/download/26.1083/3703 (download PDF)])</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)