Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Rational choice model
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Rational choice theory in international relations ==== Rational choice theory has become one of the major tools used to study international relations. Proponents of its use in this field typically assume that states and the policies crafted at the national outcome are the outcome of self-interested, politically shrewd actors including, but not limited to, politicians, lobbyists, businesspeople, activists, regular voters and any other individual in the national audience. The use of rational choice theory as a framework to predict political behavior has led to a rich literature that describes the trajectory of policy to varying degrees of success. For example, some scholars have examined how states can make credible threats to deter other states from a (nuclear) attack.<ref>T.C. Schelling (1960). ''The Strategy of Conflict''. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; G. H. Snyder and P. Diesing (1977). ''Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises''. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; R. Powell (1990). ''Nuclear Deterrence Theory: The Search for Credibility''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</ref> Others have explored under what conditions states wage war against each other.<ref>Bruce Bueno de Mesquita (1981). "Risk, Power Distributions, and the Likelihood of War," ''International Studies Quarterly'', 25(4), pp. 541β568; J.D. Fearon (1995). "Rationalist Explanations for War," ''International Organization'', 49(3), pp. 379β414.</ref> Yet others have investigated under what circumstances the threat and imposition of international economic sanctions tend to succeed and when they are likely to fail.<ref>Jaleh Dashti-Gibson, Patricia Davis, and Benjamin Radcliff (1997). "On the Determinants of the Success of Economic Sanctions: An Empirical Analysis," ''American Journal of Political Science'', 41(2), pp. 608β618; Daniel W. Drezner (1999). ''The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Lisa L. Martin (1992). ''Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions''. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Claas Mertens, [[doi:10.1093/isq/sqae016|Carrots as Sticks: How Effective Are Foreign Aid Suspensions and Economic Sanctions?, ''International Studies Quarterly'', Vol. 68, Iss. 2, June 2024]]</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)