Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Rational pricing
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Swaps=== Rational pricing underpins the logic of [[Swap (finance)|swap]] valuation. Here, two [[Counterparty|counterparties]] "swap" obligations, effectively exchanging [[cash flow]] streams calculated against a notional [[:wikt:principal|principal]] amount, and the value of the swap is the [[present value]] (PV) of both sets of future cash flows "netted off" against each other. To be arbitrage free, the terms of a swap contract are such that, initially, the [[Net present value|''Net'' present value]] of these future cash flows is equal to zero; see {{slink|Swap (finance)#Valuation and Pricing}}. Once traded, swaps can (must) also be priced using rational pricing. The examples below are for [[interest rate swap]]s{{snd}} and are representative of pure rational pricing as these exclude [[credit risk]]{{snd}} although the principle applies to [[:Category:Swaps (finance)|any type of swap]]. <!-- Note that since the [[2007–2012 global financial crisis]], pricing is under a "multi-curve" framework, whereas previously it was off a single, "self discounting", curve; see [[Financial economics#Derivative pricing]] for context. Of course, under both approaches, pricing must be arbitrage free, and the logic below therefore holds under either, although see [[Interest rate swap#Valuation and pricing]] for formulae. (not arbitrage related, and therefore confusing...)--> ====Valuation at initiation==== Consider a fixed-to-floating Interest rate swap where Party A pays a fixed rate ("[[Swap rate]]"), and Party B pays a floating rate. Here, the ''fixed rate'' would be such that the present value of future fixed rate payments by Party A is equal to the present value of the ''expected'' future floating rate payments (i.e. the NPV is zero). Were this not the case, an arbitrageur, C, could: # Assume the position with the ''lower'' present value of payments, and borrow funds equal to this present value # Meet the cash flow obligations on the position by using the borrowed funds, and receive the corresponding payments—which have a higher present value # Use the received payments to repay the debt on the borrowed funds # Pocket the difference – where the difference between the present value of the loan and the present value of the inflows is the arbitrage profit ====Subsequent valuation==== The Floating leg of an interest rate swap can be "decomposed" into a series of [[forward rate agreement]]s. Here, since the swap has identical payments to the FRA, arbitrage free pricing must apply as above – i.e. the value of this leg is equal to the value of the corresponding FRAs. Similarly, the "receive-fixed" leg of a swap can be valued by comparison to a [[Bond (finance)|bond]] with the same schedule of payments. (Relatedly, given that their [[underlying]]s have the same cash flows, [[bond option]]s and [[swaption]]s are equatable.) See further under {{slink|Swap (finance)#Using bond prices}}. The difference between the [[Interest rate cap and floor]] values equate to the swap value, per similar arbitrage arguments.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)