Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Regular language
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Generalizations == The notion of a regular language has been generalized to infinite words (see [[ω-automaton|ω-automata]]) and to trees (see [[tree automaton]]). [[Rational set]] generalizes the notion (of regular/rational language) to monoids that are not necessarily [[free monoid|free]]. Likewise, the notion of a recognizable language (by a finite automaton) has namesake as [[recognizable set]] over a monoid that is not necessarily free. Howard Straubing notes in relation to these facts that “The term "regular language" is a bit unfortunate. Papers influenced by [[Samuel Eilenberg|Eilenberg]]'s monograph<ref name="Eilenberg1974">{{cite book|author=Samuel Eilenberg|title=Automata, languages, and machines|publisher=Academic Press}} in two volumes "A" (1974, {{isbn|9780080873749}}) and "B" (1976, {{isbn|9780080873756}}), the latter with two chapters by Bret Tilson.</ref> often use either the term "recognizable language", which refers to the behavior of automata, or "rational language", which refers to important analogies between regular expressions and rational [[power series]]. (In fact, Eilenberg defines rational and recognizable subsets of arbitrary monoids; the two notions do not, in general, coincide.) This terminology, while better motivated, never really caught on, and "regular language" is used almost universally.”<ref>{{cite book | last=Straubing | first=Howard | title=Finite automata, formal logic, and circuit complexity | url=https://archive.org/details/finiteautomatafo0000stra | url-access=registration | series=Progress in Theoretical Computer Science | location=Basel | publisher=Birkhäuser | year=1994 | isbn=3-7643-3719-2 | zbl=0816.68086 | page= [https://archive.org/details/finiteautomatafo0000stra/page/8 8] }}</ref> [[Rational series]] is another generalization, this time in the context of a [[formal power series over a semiring]]. This approach gives rise to [[weighted rational expression]]s and [[weighted automata]]. In this algebraic context, the regular languages (corresponding to [[Boolean semiring|Boolean]]-weighted rational expressions) are usually called ''rational languages''.<ref>Berstel & Reutenauer (2011) p.47</ref><ref>{{cite book | last=Sakarovitch | first=Jacques | title=Elements of automata theory | others=Translated from the French by Reuben Thomas | location=Cambridge | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | year=2009 | isbn=978-0-521-84425-3 | zbl=1188.68177 | page = 86 }}</ref> Also in this context, Kleene's theorem finds a generalization called the [[Kleene–Schützenberger theorem]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)