Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Rolle's theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Proof of the generalized version == Since the proof for the standard version of Rolle's theorem and the generalization are very similar, we prove the generalization. The idea of the proof is to argue that if {{math|1=''f ''(''a'') = ''f ''(''b'')}}, then {{mvar|f}} must attain either [[maxima and minima|a maximum or a minimum]] somewhere between {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}}, say at {{mvar|c}}, and the function must change from increasing to decreasing (or the other way around) at {{mvar|c}}. In particular, if the derivative exists, it must be zero at {{mvar|c}}. By assumption, {{mvar|f}} is continuous on {{closed-closed|''a'', ''b''}}, and by the [[extreme value theorem]] attains both its maximum and its minimum in {{closed-closed|''a'', ''b''}}. If these are both attained at the endpoints of {{closed-closed|''a'', ''b''}}, then {{mvar|f}} is [[constant function|constant]] on {{closed-closed|''a'', ''b''}} and so the derivative of {{mvar|f}} is zero at every point in {{open-open|''a'', ''b''}}. Suppose then that the maximum is obtained at an [[interior point]] {{mvar|c}} of {{open-open|''a'', ''b''}} (the argument for the minimum is very similar, just consider {{math|β''f ''}}). We shall examine the above right- and left-hand limits separately. For a real {{mvar|h}} such that {{math|''c'' + ''h''}} is in {{closed-closed|''a'', ''b''}}, the value {{math|''f ''(''c'' + ''h'')}} is smaller or equal to {{math|''f ''(''c'')}} because {{mvar|f}} attains its maximum at {{mvar|c}}. Therefore, for every {{math|''h'' > 0}}, <math display="block">\frac{f(c+h)-f(c)}{h}\le0,</math> hence <math display="block">f'(c^+):=\lim_{h \to 0^+}\frac{f(c+h)-f(c)}{h}\le0,</math> where the limit exists by assumption, it may be minus infinity. Similarly, for every {{math|''h'' < 0}}, the inequality turns around because the denominator is now negative and we get <math display="block">\frac{f(c+h)-f(c)}{h}\ge0,</math> hence <math display="block">f'(c^-):=\lim_{h \to 0^-}\frac{f(c+h)-f(c)}{h}\ge0,</math> where the limit might be plus infinity. Finally, when the above right- and left-hand limits agree (in particular when {{mvar|f}} is differentiable), then the derivative of {{mvar|f}} at {{mvar|c}} must be zero. (Alternatively, we can apply [[Fermat's theorem (stationary points)|Fermat's stationary point theorem]] directly.)
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)