Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
SKI combinator calculus
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Connection to intuitionistic logic== The combinators '''K''' and '''S''' correspond to two well-known axioms of [[sentential logic]]: :{{math|'''AK''': ''A'' → (''B'' → ''A'')}}, :{{math|'''AS''': (''A'' → (''B'' → ''C'')) → ((''A'' → ''B'') → (''A'' → ''C''))}}. Function application corresponds to the rule [[modus ponens]]: :{{math|'''MP'''}}: from {{mvar|A}} and {{math|''A'' → ''B''}}, infer {{mvar|B}}. The axioms '''AK''' and '''AS''', and the rule '''MP''' are complete for the implicational fragment of [[intuitionistic logic]]. In order for combinatory logic to have as a model: *The [[implicational propositional calculus|implicational fragment]] of [[classical logic]], would require the combinatory analog to the [[law of excluded middle]], ''i.e.'', [[Peirce's law]]; *[[sentential logic|Complete classical logic]], would require the combinatory analog to the sentential axiom {{math|'''F''' → ''A''}}. This connection between the types of combinators and the corresponding logical axioms is an instance of the [[Curry–Howard isomorphism]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)