Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Source code
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Copyright and licensing == {{main|Software copyright|Software license}} {{see also|History of free and open-source software}} The situation varies worldwide, but in the United States before 1974, software and its source code was not [[copyright]]able and therefore always [[public domain software]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Liu |first1=Joseph P.|last2=Dogan |first2= Stacey L.|date=2005|title=Copyright Law and Subject Matter Specificity: The Case of Computer Software|url=https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp/536/|journal=New York University Annual Survey of American Law|language=en|volume=61|issue=2 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210625073240/https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp/536/ |archive-date=Jun 25, 2021}}</ref> In 1974, the US Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works ([[CONTU]]) decided that "computer programs, to the extent that they embody an author's original creation, are proper subject matter of copyright".<ref>[http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1344&context=ggulrev Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corporation Puts the Byte Back into Copyright Protection for Computer Programs] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170507231059/http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1344&context=ggulrev |date=7 May 2017 }} in Golden Gate University Law Review Volume 14, Issue 2, Article 3 by Jan L. Nussbaum (January 1984)</ref><ref name="sail_book">Lemley, Menell, Merges and Samuelson. ''Software and Internet Law'', p. 34.</ref> [[Proprietary software]] is rarely distributed as source code.{{sfn|Boyle|2003|p=45}} Although the term [[open-source software]] literally refers to [[source-available software|public access to the source code]],{{sfn|Morin ''et al.''|2012|loc=Open Source versus Closed Source}} open-source software has additional requirements: free redistribution, permission to modify the source code and release derivative works under the same license, and nondiscrimination between different uses—including commercial use.{{sfn|Sen ''et al.''|2008|p=209}}{{sfn|Morin ''et al.''|2012|loc=Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) Licensing}} The free [[software reuse|reusability]] of open-source software can speed up development.{{sfn|O'Regan|2022|p=106}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)