Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Three-fifths Compromise
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Debate=== Before the Civil War aspects of the Constitution were subject for significant debate by abolitionists. The [[William Lloyd Garrison|Garrisonian]] view (William Lloyd Garrison (1805–1879), a prominent American abolitionist best known for his widely read anti-slavery newspaper ''The Liberator'' of the 1830s) of the Constitution was that it was a pro-slavery document and only completely dividing the Union could satisfy the cause of anti-slavery. Following a bitter series of public debates including one with [[George Thompson (abolitionist)|George Thompson]],<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ZmW-F5s-Dk8C&pg=PA173 Frederick Douglass and the Fourth of July], p. 173</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ylTDDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA316|title=Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom|first=David W.|last=Blight|date=January 7, 2020|publisher=Simon and Schuster|isbn=978-1-4165-9032-3 |via=Google Books}}</ref> [[Frederick Douglass]] took another view, pointing to the Constitution as an anti-slavery document: <blockquote>But giving the provisions the very worse construction, what does it amount to? I answer—It is a downright disability laid upon the slaveholding States; one which deprives those States of two-fifths of their natural basis of representation. A black man in a free State is worth just two-fifths more than a black man in a slave State, as a basis of political power under the Constitution. Therefore, instead of encouraging slavery, the Constitution encourages freedom by giving an increase of “two-fifths” of political power to free over slave States. So much for the three-fifths clause; taking it at is worst, it still leans to freedom, not slavery; for, be it remembered that the Constitution nowhere forbids a coloured man to vote.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=gKhJDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA458 The Cambridge Companion to the United States Constitution], Cambridge University Press, p. 458</ref><ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ic3TAAAAMAAJ&dq=%22the+Constitution+encourages+freedom+by+giving+an+increase+of%22&pg=PA194 Frederick Douglass], p. 194</ref></blockquote>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)