Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Workhouse
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Education=== [[File:Children at crumpsall workhouse circa 1895.jpg|thumb|A group of children at [[Crumpsall]] Workhouse, 1895β97]] Education was provided for the children,{{sfnp|Higginbotham|2006|p=19|ps=none}} but workhouse teachers were a particular problem. Poorly paid, without any formal training, and facing large classes of unruly children with little or no interest in their lessons, few stayed in the job for more than a few months.{{sfnp|Fowler|2007|pp=134β135|ps=none}} In an effort to force workhouses to offer at least a basic level of education, legislation was passed in 1845 requiring that all pauper apprentices should be able to read and sign their own [[indenture]] papers.{{sfnp|Fowler|2007|p=135|ps=none}} A training college for workhouse teachers was set up at [[Kneller Hall]] in [[Twickenham]] during the 1840s, but it closed in the following decade.{{sfnp|Fowler|2007|p=134|ps=none}} Some children were trained in skills valuable to the area. In [[Shrewsbury]], the boys were placed in the workhouse's workshop, while girls were tasked with [[Spinning (textiles)|spinning]], making gloves and other jobs "suited to their sex, their ages and abilities". At [[St Martin in the Fields]], children were trained in spinning [[flax]], picking hair and [[carding]] wool, before being placed as apprentices. Workhouses also had links with local industry; in [[Nottingham]], children employed in a cotton mill earned about Β£60 a year for the workhouse. Some parishes advertised for apprenticeships, and were willing to pay any employer prepared to offer them. Such agreements were preferable to supporting children in the workhouse: apprenticed children were not subject to inspection by justices, thereby lowering the chance of punishment for neglect; and apprenticeships were viewed as a better long-term method of teaching skills to children who might otherwise be uninterested in work. Supporting an apprenticed child was also considerably cheaper than the workhouse or outdoor relief.{{sfnp|Honeyman|2007|pp=21β23|ps=none}} Children often had no say in the matter, which could be arranged without the permission or knowledge of their parents.{{sfnp|Higginbotham|2006|p=19|ps=none}} The supply of labour from workhouse to factory, which remained popular until the 1830s, was sometimes viewed as a form of [[penal transportation|transportation]]. While getting parish apprentices from [[Clerkenwell]], [[Samuel Oldknow]]'s agent reported how some parents came "crying to beg they may have their Children out again". Historian Arthur Redford suggests that the poor may have once shunned factories as "an insidious sort of workhouse".{{sfnp|Redford|1976|pp=24β25|ps=none}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)