Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Body count
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Number of people killed in an event}} {{Other uses|Body count (disambiguation)}} {{Use dmy dates|date=April 2021}} [[File:Edward III counting the dead on the battlefield of Crécy.jpg|thumbnail|Edward III's herald, the crowned king of arms, counting the dead after the [[battle of Crécy]]]] A '''body count''' is the total number of people killed in a particular event. In combat, a body count is often based on the number of confirmed kills, but occasionally only an estimate. Often used in reference to military combat, the term can also refer to any situation involving multiple killings, such as the actions of [[death squad]]s or [[serial killer]]s. The military gathers such figures for a variety of reasons, such as determining the need for continuing operations, estimating efficiency of new and old weapons systems, and planning follow-up operations. The term has since been used to describe the number of [[sexual partner]]s a person has engaged with.<ref name=":0">{{cite web |last1=Salmin |first1=Dee |title=Body Count: What's the current obsession? And does it even matter? |url=https://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/the-hook-up/body-count-sex-number-people-slept-with-tiktok/13614878 |website=[[Australian Broadcasting Corporation]] |date=3 November 2021 |access-date=26 September 2022}}</ref> ==Military use== {{Globalize|section|date=June 2010}} "Body count" figures have a long history in military planning and [[propaganda]]. ===Sassanian Empire=== According to [[Procopius]], when the [[Sassanian Empire|Persians]] were about to march to a war, the king would sit on the throne and many baskets would be set before him. The men of the army would pass along the baskets one by one, each throwing one arrow in the baskets, which would then be sealed with the king's seal. When the army returned to Persia, each man would take an arrow from the baskets, and the number of casualties would be determined by the number of remaining arrows.<ref>[[Procopius|Prokopios]], ''The Wars of Justinian'', translated by H. B. Dewing, Hackett Publishing, 2014, {{ISBN|9781624661723}}, page</ref> ===The Holocaust=== {{see also|The Holocaust|Bandenbekämpfung}} During the [[Holocaust]] in [[The Holocaust in Russia|Russia]], [[the Holocaust in Belarus|Belarus]], [[the Holocaust in Ukraine|Ukraine]] and other eastern areas, killing was done by [[Nazi Germany]]'s military police forces, including ''[[Einsatzgruppen]]'', the [[Sicherheitsdienst|SD]], and Wehrmacht police battalions, in massacres by shooting the victims.{{sfn|Beorn|2014|p=6, 126}} Such units measured their progress by counting the number of people killed.{{sfn|Beorn|2014|p=69}} And the number of killed people was 1.5 million Jews. These murder operations took place under the guise of [[bandit fighting|anti-partisan warfare]], but in reality few of those killed were actually partisans.{{sfn|Beorn|2014|p=7}} ===Vietnam War=== {{main |Vietnam War body count controversy}} Since the goal of the United States in the [[Vietnam War]] was not to conquer [[North Vietnam]] but rather to ensure the survival of the South Vietnamese government, measuring progress was difficult. All the contested territory was theoretically "held" already. Instead, the U.S. Army used body counts to show that the U.S. was winning the war, leading to falsified and inflated enemy body count numbers. The Army's theory was that eventually, the Vietcong and North Vietnamese Army would lose after the [[attrition warfare]]. Historian [[Christian Appy]] states "[[search and destroy]] was the principal tactic; and the enemy body count was the primary measure of progress" in the US strategy of [[attrition warfare|attrition]]. Search and destroy was a term to describe operations aimed at flushing the Viet Cong out of hiding, while body count was the measuring stick for operation success. Appy claims that American commanders exaggerated body counts by 100 percent.<ref>{{cite book|author=Appy, Christian G.|title=Working-Class War: American Combat Soldiers and Vietnam|publisher=Univ of North Carolina Press|year=2000|pages=153–56}}</ref> This method was controversial, due to two issues. The first is regarding the counting of unarmed civilians killed in actions as enemy combatants in [[free-fire zone]]<ref>{{cite book|last=Lewy|first=Guenter|title=America in Vietnam|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=1978|isbn=9780199874231|pages=450–1}}</ref> as it was estimated that around 220,000 civilians killed by US/ARVN battle operations were miscounted as "enemy KIA".<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=spc4DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA34|title=East Asia's Other Miracle: Explaining the Decline of Mass Atrocities|last=Bellamy|first=Alex J.|date=29 September 2017|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780191083785|pages=33–34|language=en}}</ref> Another issue is inflation<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-01-31-mn-442-story.html| title = Archives - Los Angeles Times| website = [[Los Angeles Times]]| date = 31 January 1991}} </ref><ref name=Sorley>{{cite book|last=Sorley|first=Lewis|title=A Better War: The Unexamined Victories and Final Tragedy of America's Last Years in Vietnam|publisher=Harvest|year=2007|isbn=9780156013093|pages=21–2}}</ref> and fabrication of body count in after-action reports, which is reported to have given false and inaccurate casualty figures for enemy dead.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nm-ov7lIe_AC|title=The Rise and Fall of an American Army|last=Stanton|first=Shelby L.|date=2003|publisher=Random House Publishing Group|isbn=9780891418276|pages=xvi-xvii|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/the-on-going-battle-for-the-soul-of-the-army|title=The On-Going Battle for the Soul of the Army {{!}} Small Wars Journal|website=smallwarsjournal.com|language=en|access-date=31 May 2018}}</ref> ===Rhodesian Bush War=== During the [[Rhodesian Bush War]] the Rhodesian Security Forces were focused on achieving a high 'kill rate' against the communist guerrilla forces. While this motivated the Rhodesian personnel to kill large numbers of guerrillas, it may have led them to attack civilians and murder prisoners. The emphasis on the 'kill rate' may have partly been the result of the influence of American and Australian Vietnam War veterans who [[Foreign volunteers in the Rhodesian Security Forces|volunteered]] to fight for Rhodesia.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=de Boer |first1=Marno |title=Rhodesia's Approach to Counterinsurgency: A Preference for Killing |journal=Military Review |date=November–December 2011 |volume=XCI |issue=6 |pages=39, 44 |url=https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/military-review/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20111231_art009.pdf}}</ref> ===Iraq War=== {{Main|Casualties of the Iraq War}} In the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]], the US military adopted an official policy of not counting deaths. General [[Tommy Franks]]' statement that "we don't do body counts" was widely reported. Critics claimed that Franks was only attempting to evade bad publicity, while supporters pointed to the failure of body counts to give an accurate impression of the state of the war in Vietnam. At the end of October 2005, it became public that the US military had been counting Iraqi fatalities since January 2004 but only those killed by insurgents and not those killed by the US forces.<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/international/middleeast/30civilians.html "U.S. Quietly Issues Estimate of Iraqi Civilian Casualties"], The New York Times</ref> == Slang usage == The term "[[wiktionary:body count|body count]]" has been used as a [[Euphemism|euphemistic]] slang term for how many people one has [[Human sexual activity|had sex]] with. This usage gained further popularity in 2020 on the social media app [[TikTok]], where users would ask strangers what their "body count" was.<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Curtis |first=Liam |date=2020-01-13 |title=What does body count mean? TikTok's latest trend explained! |url=https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2020/01/13/what-does-body-count-mean-tiktoks-latest-trend-explained/ |access-date=2022-12-27 |website=HITC |language=en-GB}}</ref> ==See also== {{Wiktionary|body count}} * [[Casualty estimation]] * [[Casualty prediction]] * [[Loss exchange ratio]] ==References== {{Reflist}} ==Bibliography== * {{cite book |last1=Beorn |first1=Waitman Wade |author-link1=Waitman Wade Beorn |title=Marching into darkness : the Wehrmacht and the Holocaust in Belarus |date=2014 |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=9780674726604}} *U.S. Army War College, [https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA063748.pdf Study on Military Professionalism], 1970 [[Category:Military-related euphemisms]] [[Category:Attrition warfare]] [[Category:Military science]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Ambox
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Globalize
(
edit
)
Template:ISBN
(
edit
)
Template:Main
(
edit
)
Template:Other uses
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:See also
(
edit
)
Template:Sfn
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Sister project
(
edit
)
Template:Use dmy dates
(
edit
)
Template:Wiktionary
(
edit
)