Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Calculus ratiocinator
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Theoretical universal logical calculation framework}} {{italic title}} {{More footnotes|date=May 2010}} The '''''calculus ratiocinator''''' is a theoretical universal logical calculation framework, a concept described in the writings of [[Gottfried Leibniz]], usually paired with his more frequently mentioned ''[[characteristica universalis]]'', a universal conceptual language. == Two views == There are two contrasting points of view on what Leibniz meant by ''calculus ratiocinator''. The first is associated with [[computer software]], the second is associated with [[computer hardware]]. === Analytic view === The received point of view in [[analytic philosophy]] and formal [[logic]], is that the ''calculus ratiocinator'' anticipates [[mathematical logic]]—an "algebra of logic".{{sfnp|Fearnley-Sander|1982|p=164}} The analytic point of view understands that the ''calculus ratiocinator'' is a formal [[inference engine]]<!--what makes an inference engine formal or informal?--> or [[computer program]], which can be designed so as to grant primacy to calculations. That logic began with [[Frege]]'s 1879 ''[[Begriffsschrift]]'' and [[Charles Sanders Peirce|C.S. Peirce]]'s writings on logic in the 1880s. [[Frege]] intended his "concept script" to be a ''calculus ratiocinator'' as well as a ''universal characteristics''. That part of formal logic relevant to the ''calculus'' comes under the heading of [[proof theory]]. From this perspective the ''calculus ratiocinator'' is only a part (or a subset) of the ''universal characteristics'', and a complete ''universal characteristics'' includes a "logical calculus". === Synthetic view === A contrasting point of view stems from [[Herbert Spencer#Synthetic philosophy|synthetic philosophy]] and fields such as [[cybernetics]], [[electronic engineering]], and [[general systems theory]]. It is little appreciated in analytic philosophy. The synthetic view understands the ''calculus ratiocinator'' as referring to a "calculating machine". The cybernetician [[Norbert Wiener]] considered Leibniz's ''calculus ratiocinator'' a forerunner to the modern day digital computer: {{quote|"The history of the modern computing machine goes back to Leibniz and Pascal. Indeed, the general idea of a computing machine is nothing but a mechanization of Leibniz's ''calculus ratiocinator''."|{{harvtxt|Wiener|1948|p=214}}}} {{quote|"...like his predecessor Pascal, [Leibniz] was interested in the construction of computing machines in the Metal. ... just as the calculus of arithmetic lends itself to a mechanization progressing through the abacus and the desk computing machine to the ultra-rapid computing machines of the present day, so the ''calculus ratiocinator'' of Leibniz contains the germs of the ''machina ratiocinatrix'', the reasoning machine."|{{harvtxt|Wiener|1965|p=12}}}} Leibniz constructed just such a machine for mathematical calculations, which was also called a "[[stepped reckoner]]". As a computing machine, the ideal ''calculus ratiocinator'' would perform Leibniz's integral and differential calculus. In this way the meaning of the word, "ratiocinator" is clarified and can be understood as a mechanical instrument that combines and compares ratios. {{gallery|align=center|mode=packed |File:Leibniz Stepped Reckoner mechanism.png|Internal mechanism of the [[stepped reckoner]] |File:Leibnitzrechenmaschine.jpg|Contemporary replica of the stepped reckoner }} [[Hartley Rogers]] saw a link between the two, defining the ''calculus ratiocinator'' as "an [[algorithm]] which, when applied to the symbols of any formula of the ''characteristica universalis'', would determine whether or not that formula were true as a statement of science".{{sfnp|Rogers|1963|p=934}} A classic discussion of the ''calculus ratiocinator'' is that of [[Louis Couturat]],{{sfnp|Couturat|1901|loc=chapters 3, 4}} who maintained that the ''characteristica universalis'' β and thus the ''calculus ratiocinator'' β were inseparable from Leibniz's encyclopedic project.{{sfnp|Couturat|1901|loc=chapter 5}} Hence the ''characteristics'', ''calculus ratiocinator'', and encyclopedia form three pillars of Leibniz's project. == See also == * {{section link|Algebraic logic|Calculus of relations}} * ''[[Mathesis universalis]]'' == References == {{reflist|15em}} == Bibliography == {{refbegin|2}} * {{cite book |last1=Couturat |first1=Louis |author-link=Louis Couturat |year=1901 |title=La Logique de Leibniz |location=Paris |publisher=Felix Alcan |translator1-last=Rutherford |translator1-first=Donald |url=https://dss-sites.ucsd.edu/drutherford/Leibniz/couturatcontents.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120814062611/http://philosophyfaculty.ucsd.edu/faculty/rutherford/Leibniz/contents.htm |archive-date=2012-08-14}} * {{cite journal |last1=Rogers |first1=Hartley Jr. |author-link=Hartley Rogers |year=1963 |title=An Example in Mathematical Logic |journal=[[The American Mathematical Monthly]] |volume=70 |issue=9 |pages=929β945 |doi=10.1080/00029890.1963.11992146}} * {{cite journal |last1=Wiener |first1=Norbert |author-link=Norbert Wiener |year=1948 |title=Time, communication, and the nervous system |journal=[[Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences]] |volume=50 |issue=4 |pages=197β219 |doi=10.1111/j.1749-6632.1948.tb39853.x |pmid=18886381 |bibcode=1948NYASA..50..197W |s2cid=28452205}} * {{cite book |last1=Wiener |first1=Norbert |author-link=Norbert Wiener |year=1965 |title=Cybernetics or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine |edition=2, paperback |publisher=[[The MIT Press]]}} * {{cite journal |last1=Fearnley-Sander |first1=Desmond |year=1982 |title=Hermann Grassmann and the Prehistory of Universal Algebra |journal=[[The American Mathematical Monthly]] |volume=89 |issue=3 |pages=161β166 |doi=10.1080/00029890.1982.11995404}} {{refend}} == External links == * [http://www.ontology.co/two-views-language.htm Language as Calculus ''versus'' Language as Universal Medium] {{Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz}} {{Authority control}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Calculus Ratiocinator}} [[Category:Concepts in logic]] [[Category:Concepts in the philosophy of language]] [[Category:History of computing]] [[Category:Mechanical calculators]] [[Category:Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Authority control
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Gallery
(
edit
)
Template:Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
(
edit
)
Template:Italic title
(
edit
)
Template:More footnotes
(
edit
)
Template:Quote
(
edit
)
Template:Refbegin
(
edit
)
Template:Refend
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Section link
(
edit
)
Template:Sfnp
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)