Editing Church and state in medieval Europe

{{Short description|Relationship between the Catholic Church and European states (5th-15th centuries)}}
{{refimprove|date=May 2011}}
[[File:Mittelalterliches Ständebild 15. Jahrhundert.png|300px|right|thumb|The traditional [[social stratification]] of the [[Western world|Occident]] in the 15th century]]
'''Church and state in medieval Europe''' was the [[Separation of church and state#Medieval_Europe|relationship]] between the [[Catholic Church]] and the various [[Monarchy|monarchies]] and other states in [[Europe]] during the [[Middle Ages]] (between the [[Fall of the Western Roman Empire|end]] of [[Roman Empire|Roman authority]] in the [[Western Roman Empire|West]] in the fifth century to their end in the [[Byzantine Empire|East]] in the fifteenth century and the beginning of the [[Modern era]]).

==Origins==
{{Integralism}}
Church gradually became a defining institution of the Roman Empire.<ref>The church in the Roman empire before A.D. 170, Part 170 By Sir William Mitchell Ramsay</ref> [[Emperor Constantine]] issued the [[Edict of Milan]] in 313 proclaiming toleration for the Christian religion, and [[convoke]]d the [[First Council of Nicaea]] in 325 whose [[Nicene Creed]] included belief in "one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church". Emperor [[Theodosius I]] made Nicene Christianity the [[state church of the Roman Empire]] with the [[Edict of Thessalonica]] of 380.<ref>Boyd, William Kenneth (1905). The ecclesiastical edicts of the Theodosian code, Columbia University Press.</ref>

Pope [[Leo the Great]] defined the role of the state as being a defender of the church's cause and a suppressor of heresies in a letter to the Eastern Roman [[Emperor Leo I]]: "You ought unhesitatingly to recognize that the Royal Power has been conferred to you not only for the Rule of the world, but especially for the defense of the Church, so that by suppressing the heinous undertakings you may defend those Statutes which are good and restore True Peace to those things which have been disordered".<ref> Quo Graviora, Leo XII, 1826 </ref>

After the fall of the Roman Empire in the 5th century, there emerged no single powerful secular government in the West. There was however a central ecclesiastical power in Rome, the Catholic Church. In this power vacuum, the church rose to become the dominant power in the [[Western Roman Empire|West]]. The church started expanding in the 10th century, and as secular kingdoms gained power at the same time, there naturally arose the conditions for a power struggle between church and state over ultimate authority.

The earliest vision of Christendom was a vision of a Christian [[theocracy]], a [[government]] founded upon and upholding [[Christian values]], whose institutions are spread through and over with [[Christian doctrine]]. In this period, members of the Christian [[clergy]] wield [[political authority]]. The specific relationship between the [[political leader]]s and the clergy varied but, in theory, the national and political divisions were at times subsumed under the leadership of the [[Catholic Church|Catholic Church as an institution]]. This model of Church&ndash;State relations was accepted by various Church leaders and political leaders in European history.<ref>{{Cite EB1911|wstitle= Episcopacy |volume= 9 |last= Phillips |first= Walter Alison |author-link= Walter Alison Phillips | pages = 699&ndash;701; see page 700, para 2, half way down |quote= The whole issue had, in fact, become confused with the confusion of functions of the Church and State. In the view of the Church of England the ultimate governance of the Christian community, in things spiritual and temporal, was vested not in the clergy but in the “Christian prince” as the vicegerent of God.}}</ref>

The classical heritage flourished throughout the Middle Ages in both the Byzantine Greek East and the Latin West. In the Greek philosopher Plato's ideal state there are three major classes, which was representative of the idea of the "tripartite soul", which is expressive of three functions or capacities of the human soul: "reason", "the spirited element", and "appetites" (or "passions"). [[Will Durant]] made a convincing case that certain prominent features of Plato's [[The Republic (Plato)|ideal community]] were discernible in the organization, dogma and effectiveness of "the" Medieval Church in Europe:<ref name="Durant">{{cite book |first=Will |last=Durant |year=2005 |title=Story of Philosophy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=suLI7RoaBEEC&pg=PA34 |publisher=Simon & Schuster |isbn=978-0-671-69500-2 |accessdate=10 December 2013}}</ref>

<blockquote>... For a thousand years Europe was ruled by an order of guardians considerably like that which was visioned by our philosopher. During the Middle Ages it was customary to classify the population of Christendom into laboratores (workers), bellatores (soldiers), and oratores (clergy). The last group, though small in number, monopolized the instruments and opportunities of culture, and ruled with almost unlimited sway half of the most powerful continent on the globe. The clergy, like Plato's guardians, were placed in authority... by their talent as shown in ecclesiastical studies and administration, by their disposition to a life of meditation and simplicity, and ... by the influence of their relatives with the powers of state and church. In the latter half of the period in which they ruled [800 AD onwards], the clergy were as free from family cares as even Plato could desire [for such guardians]... [Clerical] Celibacy was part of the psychological structure of the power of the clergy; for on the one hand they were unimpeded by the narrowing egoism of the family, and on the other their apparent superiority to the call of the flesh added to the awe in which lay sinners held them.... In the latter half of the period in which they ruled, the clergy were as free from family cares as even Plato could desire.<ref name="Durant"/></blockquote>

The [[Catholic Church]]'s peak of authority over all European Christians and their common endeavours of the Christian community — for example, the [[Crusades]], the fight against the [[Moors]] in the [[Iberian Peninsula]] and against the [[Ottoman Turks|Ottomans]] in the [[Balkans]] — helped to develop a sense of communal identity against the obstacle of Europe's deep political divisions. This authority was also used by local [[Inquisition]]s to root out divergent elements and create a religiously uniform community.

The conflict between Church and state was in many ways a uniquely Western phenomenon originating in [[Late Antiquity]] (see [[Augustine of Hippo|Saint Augustine's]] ''[[City of God (book)|City of God]]'' (417)). The [[Papal States]] in [[Italy]], today downsized to the [[Vatican City|State of Vatican]], were ruled directly by the [[Holy See]]. Moreover, throughout the Middle Ages the [[Pope]] claimed the right to [[Papal deposing power|depose]] the Catholic kings of Western Europe, and tried to exercise it, sometimes successfully (see the investiture controversy, below), sometimes not, as with [[Henry VIII of England]] and [[Henry IV of France|Henry III]] of [[Navarre]].<ref>[https://archive.org/details/delineationroma01elligoog/page/n169 <!-- pg=165 --> "Delineation of Roman Catholicism: Drawn from the authentic and acknowledged standards of the Church of Rome", by Charles Elliott, 1877 edition, page 165]</ref> However, in the [[Eastern Roman Empire]], also known as the [[Byzantine Empire]], [[state church of the Roman Empire|Church and state were closely linked and collaborated in a "symphony"]], with some exceptions (see [[Iconoclasm]]).

Before the Age of [[Absolutism (European history)|Absolutism]], institutions, such as the Church, legislatures, or social elites,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/westn/absolutism.html|title=French Absolutism|accessdate=2007-09-29|work=SUNY Suffolk history department|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100124100916/http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/westn/absolutism.html|archive-date=24 January 2010|url-status=dead}}</ref> restrained monarchical power. Absolutism was characterized by the ending of feudal partitioning, consolidation of power with the monarch, rise of the state, rise of professional standing armies, creation of professional bureaucracies, codification of state laws, and the rise of ideologies that justify the absolutist monarchy. Hence, absolutism was made possible by new innovations and characterized as a phenomenon of [[Early Modern Europe]], rather than that of the Middle Ages, where the clergy and nobility counterbalanced as a result of mutual rivalry.

==Historical events==
[[Image:PapalPolitics2.JPG|270px|left|thumb|''Antichristus'', a woodcut by [[Lucas Cranach the Elder]] of the pope using the temporal power to grant authority to a generously contributing ruler]]

===Investiture controversy===
{{Main article|Investiture controversy}}
When the [[Holy Roman Empire]] developed as a force from the tenth century, it was the first real non-barbarian challenge to the authority of the Church. A dispute between the secular and ecclesiastical powers emerged known as the [[Investiture Controversy]], beginning in the mid-eleventh century and was resolved with the [[Concordat of Worms]] in 1122. While on the surface it was over a matter of official procedures regarding the appointments of offices, underneath was a powerful struggle for control over who held ultimate authority, the King or the Pope.

===Philip the Fair===
[[Pope Boniface VIII]] put some of the strongest claims to temporal as well as spiritual supremacy of any Pope and intervened incessantly in foreign affairs. He proclaimed that it "is necessary for salvation that every living creature be under submission to the Roman pontiff", pushing Papal Supremacy to its historical extreme. Boniface's quarrel with [[Philip IV of France|Philip the Fair]] became so resentful that he excommunicated him in 1303. However, before the Pope could lay France under an interdict, Boniface was seized by Philip. Although he was released from captivity after three days, he died of shock one month later. No subsequent popes were to repeat Boniface VIII's claims.

===Thomas Becket===
Although initially close to [[Henry II of England|King Henry II]], as Archbishop of Canterbury [[Thomas Becket]] became an independent figure. King Henry devoted his reign to the restoration of the royal customs of his grandfather [[Henry I of England|King Henry I]], as part of this he wanted to extend his authority over the Church and limit its freedoms. The [[Becket dispute]] revolved around the [[Constitutions of Clarendon]], a document which Becket and the [[Pope Alexander III|Pope]] largely condemned. Becket eventually fled England and went into exile in France; during these six years there were a number of attempts at restoring peace. The fourth meeting at Fréteval ended in an agreement and Becket decided to return to Canterbury. However the King reneged on his promises made at Fréteval and in response Becket produced a number of censures on royal officials and clergymen. Four barons of the King sought to gain the King's favour and therefore proceeded to  [[Canterbury Cathedral]] to confront Becket; some claim that they intended to scare and possibly arrest Becket rather than to kill him. Nonetheless after a heated argument the four barons murdered Becket on the steps of the altar in Canterbury Cathedral. The King publicly expressed remorse for this killing, but took no action to arrest Becket's killers. He attended Canterbury in sackcloth and ashes as an act of public penance. Later in 1174 he submitted himself before the tomb of Thomas Becket, thus recognizing St. Thomas's sanctity.

===Guelphs and Ghibellines===
The conflict between the [[Guelphs and Ghibellines]] began as part of the secular-papal struggle. Guelf (also spelled Guelph) and Ghibelline, were members of two opposing factions in German and Italian politics during the Middle Ages. The split between the Guelfs, who were sympathetic to the papacy, and the Ghibellines, who were sympathetic to the German (Holy Roman) emperors, contributed to chronic strife within the cities of northern Italy in the 13th and 14th centuries.
{{Expand section|date=June 2008}}

===First Crusade===
There was some uncertainty about what would happen to [[Jerusalem]] after it was conquered in 1099. [[Godfrey of Bouillon|Godfrey de Bouillon]] refused to take the title "[[Kings of Jerusalem|king]]", and was instead called "Defender of the [[Church of the Holy Sepulcher|Holy Sepulcher]]". [[Dagobert of Pisa]] was named [[Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem|Patriarch]] in 1100, and attempted to turn the new state into a [[theocracy]], with a secular state to be created elsewhere, perhaps in [[Cairo]]. Godfrey soon died however and was succeeded by his brother [[Baldwin I of Jerusalem|Baldwin]], who did not hesitate to call himself king and actively opposed Dagobert's plans. By Dagobert's death in 1107, Jerusalem was a secular kingdom.

==See also==
* [[Caesaropapism]]
* [[Christian anarchism]]
* [[Defensor pacis]]
* [[Dominium mundi]]
* [[Hierocracy (medieval)]]
* [[Imperial church system]]
* [[Papal appointment]]
* [[Separation of church and state]]
* [[Concordat of Worms]]
* [[The Norman Anonymous]]
* [[Precedence among European monarchies]]
* [[The clash between the Church and the Empire]]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

{{Investiture controversy}}
{{History of Christianity}}
{{Middle Ages}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2017}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Church And State In Medieval Europe}}
[[Category:Catholic Church in Europe]]
[[Category:Catholicism and politics]]
[[Category:Caesaropapism]]
[[Category: Christianity and government]]
[[Category: Christianity in the Middle Ages]]
[[Category:History of Catholicism in Europe]]
[[Category:Investiture Controversy]]
[[Category:Wars of the Guelphs and Ghibellines]]