Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Clarity test
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{More citations needed|date=September 2014}} In [[decision analysis]], the '''clarity test''' (or '''clairvoyant test''') is a test of how well a model element is defined. Although nothing (outside a [[formal system]]) can be completely defined, the clarity test allows the [[decision participant]]s to determine whether such elements as variables, events, outcomes, and alternatives are sufficiently well defined to make the decision at hand. In general, a model element is well defined if a knowledgeable individual can answer questions about the model element without asking further clarifying questions. More precisely, Howard<ref name="Howard_1988" /> defines the clarity test by saying that a quantity or event is clearly defined—it passes the clarity test—if a "clairvoyant would be able to say whether or not the event in question occurred or, in the case of a variable, the value of the variable." Howard<ref name="Howard_1988" /> defines the clairvoyant as "a person who knew the future, who had access to all future newspapers, readings of physical devices, or any other determinable quantity." In later teaching Howard more broadly defined the clairvoyant as a person with perfect knowledge of all events and measurable quantities, past present and future, but no judgment. The concept of the clairvoyant is useful in decision analysis for ensuring [[clarity of thought]], particularly when assessing [[uncertainty]]. The wizard is another mythical character who can change the future, usually for a fee, provided he or she is given a well-defined request. The concept of the wizard is useful for assessing [[deterministic preference]]s by eliminating the complexity added by [[uncertainty]]. <ref>{{cite book|title=Uncertainty: A guide for dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis|year=1990|pages=50|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ajd1V305PgQC&dq=%22clarity+test%22+howard&pg=PA50|author=Millet Granger Morgan and Max Henrion|publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=9780521427449}}</ref> Links to a good discussion in Morgan & Henrion. <ref name=Howard_1988>{{cite journal|last=Howard|first=Ronald A.|title=Decision Analysis: Practice and Promise|journal=Management Science|date=June 1988|volume=34|issue=6|pages=679–695|jstor=2632123|doi=10.1287/mnsc.34.6.679}}</ref> Ron Howard's 1988 article defining the test. {{Reflist}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Clarity Test}} [[Category:Decision analysis]] [[Category:Tests]] {{Philosophy-stub}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:More citations needed
(
edit
)
Template:Philosophy-stub
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)