Editing Corwin Amendment

{{Short description|Proposed US constitutional amendment to protect slavery from federal power}}
{{Use American English|date = March 2019}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2024}}
{{US Constitution article series}}
The '''Corwin Amendment''' is a proposed [[Article Five of the United States Constitution#Proposing amendments|amendment]] to the [[Constitution of the United States|United States Constitution]] that has never been adopted, but owing to the absence of a ratification deadline, could theoretically still be adopted by the [[State legislature (United States)|state legislatures]]. It would have shielded slavery within the states from the federal constitutional amendment process and from abolition or interference by Congress.

Although the Corwin Amendment does not explicitly use the word [[Slavery in the United States|slavery]], it was designed specifically to protect slavery from federal power. The outgoing [[36th United States Congress]] proposed the Corwin Amendment on March 2, 1861, shortly before the outbreak of the [[American Civil War]], with the intent of preventing that war and preserving the Union. It passed Congress but was not ratified by the requisite number of state legislatures.

Several [[Southern United States|Southern]] states [[secession in the United States|seceded]] after the [[1860 United States presidential election|1860 presidential election]], eventually forming the [[Confederate States of America]]. Several federal legislative measures, including the Corwin Amendment, were proposed during this period in the hope of either reconciling the sections of the United States or avoiding the secession of the [[Border states (American Civil War)|border states]].<ref>{{cite book|author=Samuel Eliot Morison|author-link=Samuel Eliot Morison|title=The Oxford History of the American People|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordhistoryof00mori|url-access=registration|year=1965|publisher=Oxford University Press|page=[https://archive.org/details/oxfordhistoryof00mori/page/609 609]}}</ref> Senator [[William H. Seward]] and Representative [[Thomas Corwin]], Republicans and allies of President-elect [[Abraham Lincoln]], introduced the Corwin Amendment, which was endorsed by the outgoing president, [[James Buchanan]], as well as by Lincoln himself in his first inaugural address in 1861.<ref>Lupton, John A. (2006). "Abraham Lincoln and the Corwin Amendment". Illinois Heritage. 9 (5): 34.</ref> Because it was only ratified in a handful of Northern states and Kentucky, the Corwin Amendment failed to achieve its goal of preventing civil war and preserving the Union. Ultimately, it fell out of favor during the Civil War.

==Text==
{{quote|No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.<ref name='AmendmentsNotRatified'>{{cite web|url=https://www.house.gov/house/Amendnotrat.shtml|title=Constitutional Amendments Not Ratified|access-date=2013-11-21|publisher=United States House of Representatives|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120702135703/https://www.house.gov/house/Amendnotrat.shtml|archive-date=2012-07-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Lincoln and the Politics of Slavery: The Other Thirteenth Amendment and the Struggle to Save the Union|author=Daniel W. Crofts|year=2016|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mcs3CwAAQBAJ&q=march+2%2C+1861|page=7|publisher=UNC Press Books|access-date=November 7, 2017|isbn=978-1469627328}}</ref>}}
The text refers to slavery with terms such as "domestic institutions" and "persons held to labor or service" and avoids using the word "slavery", following the example set at the [[Constitutional Convention (United States)|Constitutional Convention]] of 1787, which referred to slavery in its draft of the Constitution with comparable descriptions of legal status: "Person held to Service", "the whole Number of free Persons ..., [[Three-Fifths Compromise|three fifths]] of all other Persons", "The Migration and Importation of such Persons".<ref>David Waldstreicher, ''Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification'' (NY: Hill & Wang, 2009), "Prologue: Meaningful Silences", pp. 3–10, 98–99, 113. "Madison succeeded only in getting through a semantic change ... that kept the slave-trade clause from stating directly 'that there could be property in men.'"{{ISBN?}}</ref>

==Legislative history==
[[File:TCorwin.jpg|thumb|left|upright=.85|[[United States House of Representatives|Representative]] [[Thomas Corwin]], author of the amendment]]
{{Events leading to US Civil War}}
{{Slavery}}
In December 1860, when the second session of the 36th Congress was convened, the deepening rift between [[slave states and free states]] was erupting into a [[Secession in the United States|secession]] crisis. The [[United States Senate|Senate]] quickly formed a "Committee of Thirteen" to investigate possible legislative measures that might solve the slavery predicament. The [[United States House of Representatives|House]] formed a "Committee of Thirty-three" with the same objective. More than 200 resolutions with respect to slavery,<ref>Jos. R. Long, "Tinkering with the Constitution", ''Yale Law Journal'', vol. 24, no. 7, May 1915, 579</ref> including 57 resolutions proposing constitutional amendments,<ref name=macveagh>Ewen Cameron Mac Veagh, "The Other Rejected Amendments", ''The North American Review'', vol. 222, no. 829, December 1925, 281-2</ref> were introduced in Congress. Most represented compromises designed to avert military conflict. Senator [[Jefferson Davis]] proposed one that explicitly protected property rights in slaves.<ref name=macveagh/> A group of House members proposed a national convention to accomplish secession as a "dignified, peaceful, and fair separation" that could settle questions like the equitable distribution of the federal government's assets and rights to navigate the Mississippi River.<ref>Russell L. Caplan, ''Constitutional Brinksmanship: Amending the Constitution by National Convention'' (Oxford University Press, 1988), 56</ref> Senator [[John J. Crittenden]] proposed a [[Crittenden Compromise|compromise]] consisting of six constitutional amendments and four Congressional resolutions,<ref>[https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/critten.asp Amendments Proposed in Congress by Senator John J. Crittenden: December 18, 1860] Avalon Project</ref> which were ultimately [[Table (parliamentary procedure)|tabled]] on December 31.

On January 14, 1861, the House committee submitted a plan calling for an amendment to protect slavery, enforce fugitive slave laws, and repeal state [[personal liberty laws]].<ref>{{cite web|author=<!--History.com editors; no by-line.-->|title=House Committee of Thirty Three submits proposed amendment|website=history.com| url=https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/house-committee-of-thirty-three-submits-proposed-amendment|date=February 1, 2019|orig-year=November 13, 2009|publisher=A&E Television Networks|access-date=April 13, 2019}}</ref> The proposed constitutional amendment declared:

{{quote|No amendment of this Constitution, having for its object any interference within the States with the relations between their citizens and those described in second section of the first article of the Constitution as "all other persons", shall originate with any State that does not recognize that relation within its own limits, or shall be valid without the assent of every one of the States composing the Union.<ref name=victor463>Orville James Victor, ''The History, Civil, Political and Military, of the Southern Rebellion'' (NY: James D Torrey, 1861), I, 463</ref>}}

While the House debated the measure over the ensuing weeks, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas had joined South Carolina in seceding from the Union. The contentious atmosphere in the House during the debate was relieved by abolitionist Republican [[Owen Lovejoy]] of Illinois, who questioned the amendment's reach: "Does that include polygamy, the other twin relic of barbarism?" Missouri Democrat [[John S. Phelps]] answered: "Does the gentleman desire to know whether he shall be prohibited from committing that crime?"<ref name=macveagh/>

On February 26, Congressman Thomas Corwin, who had chaired the earlier House committee, introduced his own text as a substitute, but it was not adopted. The following day, after a series of preliminary votes, the House voted 123 to 71 in favor of the original resolution, but as this was below the required two-thirds majority, the measure was not passed.<ref name=victor463/><ref>Francis Newton Thorpe, ''A Short Constitutional History of the United States'' (Boston: Little, Brown, 1904), 207</ref> On February 28, however, the House returned to and approved Corwin's version&mdash;House (Joint) Resolution No. 80&mdash;by a vote of 133 to 65, just barely above the two-thirds threshold.<ref>Victor, 467</ref><ref name=Gettysburg>{{cite web| url=https://gettysburgcompiler.org/2017/04/10/the-corwin-amendment-the-last-last-minute-attempt-to-save-the-union/| title=The Corwin Amendment: The Last Last-Minute Attempt to Save the Union| last=Christiensen| first=Hannah| work=The Gettysburg Compiler| publisher=Civil War Institute, Gettysburg College| location=Gettysburg, Pennsylvania| access-date=April 13, 2019| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171107014256/https://gettysburgcompiler.org/2017/04/10/the-corwin-amendment-the-last-last-minute-attempt-to-save-the-union/| archive-date=November 7, 2017| url-status=dead}}</ref>

The Senate took up the proposed amendment on March 2, 1861, debating its merits without a recess through the pre-dawn hours on March 4. When the final vote was taken, the amendment passed with exactly the needed two-thirds majority{{snd}}24–12.<ref name=Gettysburg/>

Soon afterward, it was sent to the state legislatures for ratification. The joint resolution containing the Corwin Amendment called for the amendment to be submitted to the state legislatures,<ref name=brandon219220>Brandon, 219–220</ref> as it was believed that the amendment had a greater chance of success in the legislatures of the Southern states than would have been the case in [[state ratifying conventions]], given that state conventions were being conducted at that time throughout the South at which votes to secede from the Union were successful.

The Corwin Amendment was the second proposed "Thirteenth Amendment" submitted to the states by Congress. The first was the similarly ill-fated [[Titles of Nobility Amendment]] in 1810.

==Presidential responses==
Outgoing [[President of the United States|President]] [[James Buchanan]] endorsed the Corwin Amendment by taking the unprecedented step of signing it.<ref>[[Alexander Tsesis]], ''The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom: A Legal History'' (New York University Press, 2004), 2</ref> His signature on the Congressional joint resolution was unnecessary, as the President has no formal role in the constitutional amendment process.<ref>''[[Hollingsworth v. Virginia]]'', 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 378 (1798)</ref>

[[Abraham Lincoln]], in his [[Lincoln's first inaugural address|first inaugural address]] on March 4, said of the Corwin Amendment:<ref>[https://www.bartleby.com/124/pres31.html Text of Lincoln's first inaugural address], accessed July 17, 2011</ref>
{{quote|I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution—which amendment, however, I have not seen—has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service ... holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.}}
Just weeks prior to the outbreak of the [[American Civil War|Civil War]], Lincoln sent a letter to each state's governor transmitting the proposed amendment,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.lib.niu.edu/2006/ih060934.html|title=Abraham Lincoln and the Corwin Amendment|last=Lupton|first=John A|year=2006|publisher=Illinois Periodicals Online|access-date=August 4, 2016}}</ref> noting that Buchanan had approved it. His letter did not say anything opposing or supporting the amendment itself.<ref name=holzer429/>

==Ratification history==
The Corwin Amendment has been ratified by:
[[File:Corwin Amendment state ratification map 2022.svg|thumb|right|upright=.90|{{legend|#377eb8|Ratified amendment}}{{legend|#9EC7F3|Ratified, then rescinded}}{{legend|#984ea3|Ratification questionable}}]]
# [[Kentucky]]: April 4, 1861<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/kentuckysession00kentgoog|quote=amendment Kentucky April 4, 1861.|work=Acts of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Passed at the Called Session which was Begun and Held in the City of Frankfort, on Thursday, the 17th Day of January 1861 and Ended on Friday, the Fifth Day of April 1861|title=Resolution 10|publisher=Commonwealth of Kentucky|year=1861|location=Frankfort|pages=[https://archive.org/details/kentuckysession00kentgoog/page/n72 51]–52|language=en|via=Internet Archive}}</ref>
# [[Ohio]]: May 13, 1861<ref>58 Ohio Laws 190</ref> (rescinded ratification – March 31, 1864)<ref>61 Ohio Laws 182</ref>
# [[Rhode Island]]: May 31, 1861<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mcs3CwAAQBAJ|title=Lincoln and the Politics of Slavery: The Other Thirteenth Amendment and the Struggle to Save the Union|last=Crofts|first=Daniel W.|publisher=University of North Carolina Press|year=2016|isbn=9781469627328|location=Chapel Hill|pages=245–250|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=[[c:File:Corwin Amendment ratified by Rhode Island.png|Adoption of the Corwin Amendment]]|date=June 3, 1861|work=Providence Evening Press|page=2}}</ref>
# [[Maryland]]: January 10, 1862<ref name=holzer429>Harold Holzer, ''Lincoln President-Elect: Abraham Lincoln and the Great Secession Winter 1860-1861'' (NY: Simon & Schuster, 2008), 429</ref><ref>''Laws of the State of Maryland, Made and Passed At a Session of the General Assembly begun and held at the City of Annapolis on the third day of December 1861, and ended on the tenth day of March 1862.'' (Chapter 21, pages 21 and 22)</ref> (rescinded ratification – April 7, 2014)<ref>{{cite web|title=Rescission of Maryland's Ratification of the Corwin Amendment to the United States Constitution|url=https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/webmga/frmMain.aspx?pid=billpage&stab=03&id=sj0001&tab=subject3&ys=2014RS|publisher=General Assembly of Maryland|access-date=April 10, 2014}}</ref>
# [[Illinois]]: June 2, 1863<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/lawsofstateofill1863illi|title=Public Laws of the State of Illinois Passed by the Twenty-Third General Assembly Convened January 5, 1863|last=Illinois General Assembly|publisher=Baker & Phillips|year=1863|location=Springfield|pages=[https://archive.org/details/lawsofstateofill1863illi/page/41 41]–42}}</ref> (rescinded ratification – April 4, 2022)<ref>{{cite web|title=Rescission of Illinois's Ratification of the Corwin Amendment to the United States Constitution|url=https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=22&GAID=16&DocTypeID=SJR&SessionID=110&GA=102|publisher=General Assembly of Illinois|access-date=January 6, 2023}}</ref>

On February 14, 1862, prior to the 1863 ratification of the amendment by the [[Illinois General Assembly]], an Illinois state constitutional convention purported to ratify the Corwin Amendment. However, since Illinois state lawmakers were sitting as delegates to a convention at the time&mdash;and not meeting as the actual state legislature&mdash;that action was of questionable validity.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Martin|first=Philip L.|date=March 1967|title=Convention Ratification of Federal Constitutional Amendments|journal=Political Science Quarterly|volume=82|issue=1|pages=67–71|doi=10.2307/2147300|jstor=2147300}}</ref>

The [[Restored Government of Virginia]], consisting mostly of representatives of what would become [[West Virginia]], voted to approve the amendment on February 13, 1862.<ref name=":0" /> However, West Virginia did not ratify the amendment after it became a state in 1863.

In 1963, more than a century after the Corwin Amendment was submitted to the state legislatures by Congress, a joint resolution to ratify it was introduced in the [[Texas House of Representatives]] by [[Dallas]] Republican [[Henry Stollenwerck]].<ref>House Joint Resolution No. 67, 58th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 1963</ref> His reason for doing so was likely related to protecting other 'domestic institutions', as he stated his opposition to slavery. His joint resolution was referred to the House's Committee on Constitutional Amendments on March 7, 1963, but received no further consideration.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.progress.org/archive/texas-35-years-ago|title=Slavery: Just a 'Detail'?|publisher=The Progress Report|date=August 13, 2003|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150626102420/https://www.progress.org/archive/texas-35-years-ago|archive-date=June 26, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref>

==Attempted withdrawal of amendment==
[[File:Corwin Amendment.jpg|thumb|upright=.80|The Corwin Amendment as approved by the [[36th U.S. Congress]], March 1861]]
On February 8, 1864, during the 38th Congress, with the prospects for a Union victory improving, Republican Senator [[Henry B. Anthony]] of Rhode Island introduced [https://www.congress.gov/bill/38th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/25/text Senate (Joint) Resolution No. 25]<ref>''Congressional Globe'', pp. 522-523</ref> to withdraw the Corwin Amendment from further consideration by the state legislatures and to halt the ratification process. That same day, Anthony's joint resolution was referred to the Senate's Committee on the Judiciary. On May 11, 1864, Illinois Senator [[Lyman Trumbull]], Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, received the Senate's permission to discharge Senate (Joint) Resolution No. 25 from the committee, but no further action was taken on Anthony's joint resolution.<ref>''Congressional Globe'', p. 2218; Mac Veagh, 282-3; Caplan, 128</ref>

==Debates over hypothetical impact==
The Corwin Amendment never became law. But if it had done so, then, under the [[plain meaning rule]], it would have made slavery [[Entrenched clause|immune]] to the [[Article Five of the United States Constitution|constitutional amendment procedures]] and to interference by Congress. As a result, the later [[Reconstruction Amendments]] (Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth) would not have been permissible, as they abolish or interfere with the domestic institution of the states.

A competing theory, however, suggests that only the [[entrenched clause]]s of the original constitution (of which the only one still active is the clause protecting the states' equal voting power in the Senate) can be protected from subsequent amendments under the established amending formula. Under this theory, a later amendment conflicting with an already-ratified Corwin Amendment could either explicitly repeal the Corwin Amendment (as the [[Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution|Twenty-first Amendment]] explicitly repealed the [[Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Eighteenth Amendment]]) or be inferred to have either superseded or partially or completely repealed any conflicting provisions of an already-adopted Corwin Amendment.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Linder|first=Douglas|title=What in the Constitution Cannot be Amended?|journal=Arizona Law Review|pages=717|url=https://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/unamendable.html|access-date=November 11, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100627223113/https://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/unamendable.html|archive-date=June 27, 2010|url-status=dead}}.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.iconnectblog.com/the-unamendable-corwin-amendment/|title=The Unamendable Corwin Amendment|last=Albert|first=Richard|date=February 27, 2013|publisher=Int'l J. Const. L. Blog|access-date=March 2, 2013}}</ref>

==See also==
{{Portal|American Civil War}}
* [[List of amendments to the United States Constitution]], amendments sent to the states, both ratified and unratified
* [[Peace Conference of 1861]]

{{clear}}

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==Further reading==
* {{cite journal|last=Bryant|first=A. Christopher|year=2003|title=Stopping Time: The Pro-Slavery and 'Irrevocable' Thirteenth Amendment|url=https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/fac_pubs/63/|journal=[[Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy]]|volume=26|pages=501|issn=0193-4872}}
* {{cite book|last=Crofts|first=Daniel W|title=Lincoln and the Politics of Slavery: The Other Thirteenth Amendment and the Struggle to Save the Union|year=2016|publisher=University of North Carolina Press Books|isbn=978-1-4696-2731-1|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mcs3CwAAQBAJ}}
* {{cite journal|last=Lee|first=R. Alton|year=1961|title=The Corwin Amendment in the Secession Crisis|journal=[[Ohio History|The Ohio Historical Quarterly]]|url=https://resources.ohiohistory.org/ohj/browse/displaypages.php?display[]=0070&display[]=1&display[]=26|volume=70|issue=1|pages=1–26}}
* {{cite journal|last=Martin|first=Philip L.|title=Illinois' Ratification of the Corwin Amendment|journal=Journal of Public Law|volume=15|year=1966|pages=18–91}}

==External links==
{{Wikisource|Corwin Amendment}}
* [https://digital.ncdcr.gov/cdm/ref/collection/p15012coll11/id/611 Letter from Abraham Lincoln transmitting the Corwin Amendment to North Carolina Governor John W. Ellis, March 16, 1861]
* {{cite web|url=https://www.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/psa/app1.htm#B|last=Suber|first=Peter|title=The Paradox of Self-Amendment (Section on Corwin Amendment)|year=1990|access-date=December 3, 2005|archive-date=October 15, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121015233836/https://www.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/psa/app1.htm#B|url-status=dead}}
* {{cite web|url=https://ghostamendment.com|last=Walter|first=Michael|title=Ghost Amendment: The Thirteenth Amendment that Never Was|year=2003|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180806203304/https://ghostamendment.com/|archive-date=August 6, 2018}}
* {{cite web|url=https://www.thiscruelwar.com/abraham-lincoln-and-the-thirteenth-amendment-that-wasnt/|title=Abraham Lincoln and the Thirteenth Amendment that Wasn't|date=June 16, 2016|publisher=This Cruel War Blog|access-date=September 20, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180526224449/https://www.thiscruelwar.com/abraham-lincoln-and-the-thirteenth-amendment-that-wasnt/|archive-date=May 26, 2018|url-status=usurped}}

{{US Constitution}}
{{James Buchanan}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Secession crisis of 1860–61]]
[[Category:1861 in American law]]
[[Category:1861 in American politics]]
[[Category:Unratified amendments to the United States Constitution]]
[[Category:United States slavery law]]
[[Category:36th United States Congress]]
[[Category:1861 documents]]

[[de:13. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten#Das Corwin-Amendment]]