Editing Director's cut

{{Short description|Stage in the film editing process or an alternate version of a film}}
{{other uses}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2020}}
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=July 2021}}
In public use, a '''director's cut''' is the director's preferred version of a [[film]] (or [[video game]], [[Episode|television episode]], [[music video]], [[Television advertisement|commercial]], ''etc.''). It is generally considered a marketing term to represent the version of a film the director prefers, and is usually used in contrast to a theatrical release of that film where the director did not have [[final cut privilege]] and did not agree with what was released. The word "[[Cut (transition)|cut]]" is used in this context as a [[synecdoche]] to refer to the entire [[film editing]] process and the resulting product. Traditionally, films were edited by literally cutting [[Film stock|strips of film]] and splicing them together. 

Most of the time, film directors do not have the "final cut" (final say on the version released to the public). Those with money invested in the film, such as the production companies, distributors, or studios, may make changes intended to make the film more profitable at the box office. In extreme cases that can sometimes mean a different ending, less ambiguity, or excluding scenes that would earn a more audience-restricting [[Motion picture rating system|rating]], but more often means that the film is simply shortened to provide more screenings per day.

With the rise of home video, the phrase became more generically used as a marketing term to communicate to consumers that this is the director's preferred edit of a film, and it implies the director was not happy with the version that was originally released. Sometimes there are big disagreements between the director's vision and the producer's vision, and the director's preferred edit is sought after by fans (for example Terry Gilliam's [[Brazil (1985 film)|''Brazil'']]).<ref>{{cite book |last=Mathews |first=Jack |date=1987 |title=The Battle of Brazil |publisher=Crown |isbn=9780517565384}}</ref>

Not all films have separate "director's cuts" (often the director is happy with the theatrical release, even if they didn't have final cut privilege), and sometimes separate versions of films are released as "director's cuts" even if the director doesn't prefer them. Once such example is Ridley Scott's [[Alien (film)|''Alien'']], which had a "director's cut" released in 2003, even though the director said it was purely for "marketing purposes" and didn't represent his preferred vision for the film.<ref>{{Cite AV media |people=[[Ridley Scott]] ([[Film director|Director]]) |date=December 2, 2003 |title=[[Alien Quadrilogy]] |medium=DVD booklet |publisher=[[20th Century Fox]] Home Entertainment, Inc |location=Los Angeles}}</ref>

Sometimes alternate edits are released, which are not necessarily director's preferred cuts, but which showcase different visions for the project for fans to enjoy. Examples include James Cameron's [[Avatar (2009 film)|''Avatar'']], which was released as both a "Special Edition" and "Extended" cuts, and Peter Jackson's [[The Lord of the Rings (film series)|''Lord of the Rings'']], which were released on home video as "Extended Editions".<ref name="rings">{{ cite web |url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2003/12/08/interview-peter-jackson-2?page=4 |title=Peter Jackson Interview |date=May 19, 2012 |website=IGN.com |author=Jeff Otto}}</ref> These versions do not represent the director's preferred visions.<ref name="McCormick">{{cite web |url=https://screenrant.com/lord-rings-extended-editions-all-extra-scenes/ |title=Every Extra Scene Added In Lord Of The Rings' Extended Editions |last=McCormick |first=Colin |last2=Nicholas Raymond |first2=Charlies |date=Feb 2, 2024 |website=Screen Rant |quote=Peter Jackson, who directed all three Lord of the Rings films, stated he prefers the theatrical versions since the LOTR extended editions are mostly for the benefit of fans who want to see everything excised from the final cut.}}</ref>

The term since expanded to include media such as video games, comic books and music albums (the latter two of which don't actually have directors).

== Original use of the phrase ==
Within the industry itself, a "director's cut" refers to a stage in the editing process, and is not usually what a director wants to release to the public, due to the fact it is unfinished. The [[Film editing|editing process of a film]] is broken into stages: First is the assembly/rough cut, where all selected takes are put together in the order in which they should appear in the film. Next, the [[editor's cut]] is reduced from the rough cut; the editor may be guided by their own choices or following notes from the director or producers. Eventually is the [[Final cut (film editing)|final cut]], which actually gets released or broadcast. In between the editor's cut and the final cut can come any number of fine cuts, including the director's cut. The director's cut may include unsatisfactory takes, a preliminary soundtrack, a lack of desired [[Pick-up (filmmaking)|pick-up shots]] etc., which the director would not like to be shown but uses as a placeholder until satisfactory replacements can be inserted. This is still how the term is used within the film industry, as well as commercials, television, and music videos.

== Inception ==
The trend of releasing alternate cuts of films for artistic reasons became prominent in the 1970s; in 1974, the "director's cut" of ''[[The Wild Bunch]]'' was shown theatrically in Los Angeles to sold-out audiences.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Jones |first1=Ellen |title=Is a 'director's cut' ever a good idea? |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/apr/07/rise-of-the-directors-cut |newspaper=The Guardian |date=7 April 2011}}</ref> The theatrical release of the film had cut 10 minutes to get an R rating, but this cut was hailed as superior and has now become the definitive one. Other early examples include [[George Lucas]]'s [[THX 1138|first]] [[American Graffiti|two]] films being re-released following the success of ''[[Star Wars]]'', in cuts which more closely resembled his vision, or [[Peter Bogdanovich]] re-cutting ''[[The Last Picture Show]]'' several times. [[Charlie Chaplin]] also re-released all of his films in the 1970s, several of which were re-cut (Chaplin's re-release of ''[[The Gold Rush]]'' in the 1940s is almost certainly the earliest prominent example of a director's re-cut film being released to the public). A theatrical re-release of ''[[Close Encounters of the Third Kind]]'' used the phrase "[[Special edition|Special Edition]]" to describe a cut which was closer to Spielberg's intent but had a compromised ending demanded by the studio.

As the [[home video]] industry rose in the early 1980s, video releases of director's cuts were sometimes created for the small but dedicated [[cult following|cult fan]] market. Los Angeles [[Cable television|cable]] station [[Z Channel]] is also cited as significant in the popularization of alternate cuts. Early examples of films released in this manner include [[Michael Cimino]]'s ''[[Heaven's Gate (film)|Heaven's Gate]]'',<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.filminquiry.com/the-production-of-heavens-gate/ |title=Unmaking of an Epic - The Production of Heaven's Gate{{!}}Film Inquiry |date=28 April 2015}}</ref> where a longer cut was recalled from theatres but subsequently shown on cable and eventually released to home video; [[James Cameron]]'s ''[[Aliens (film)|Aliens]]'', where a video release restored 20 minutes the studio had insisted on cutting; Cameron also voluntarily made cuts to the theatrical version of ''[[The Abyss]]'' for pacing but restored them for a video release, and most famously, [[Ridley Scott]]'s ''[[Blade Runner]]'', where an alternate workprint version was released to fan acclaim, ultimately resulting in the 1992 recut.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/best-blade-runner-cut/ |title=Which Blade Runner Cut Is Really the Best? |first=John |last=Saavedra |date=11 November 2021 |website=Den of Geek}}</ref> Scott later recut the film once more, releasing a version dubbed "The Final Cut" in 2007. This was the final re-cut and the first in which Scott maintained creative control over the final product, leading to The Final Cut being considered the definitive version of the film.

== Criticism ==
Once distributors discovered that consumers would buy alternate versions of films, it became more common for films to have alternative versions released. And the original public meaning of a director's preferred vision has become ignored, leading to so-called "director's cuts" of films where the director prefers the theatrically released version (or when the director had actual final cut privilege in the first place). Such versions are often marketing ploys, assembled by simply restoring deleted scenes, sometimes adding as much as a half-hour to the length of the film without regard to pacing and storytelling.

As a result, the "director's cut" is often considered a misnomer. Some directors deliberately try to avoid labelling alternate versions as such (e.g. [[Peter Jackson]] and [[James Cameron]]; each using the phrases "Special Edition" or "Extended Edition" for alternate versions of their films).

Sometimes the term is used a marketing ploy. For example, Ridley Scott states on the director's commentary track of ''[[Alien (film)|Alien]]'' that the original theatrical release was his "director's cut", and that the new version was released as a marketing ploy. Director [[Peter Bogdanovich]], no stranger to director's cuts himself, cites ''[[Red River (1948 film)|Red River]]'' as an example where {{Blockquote|MGM have a version of Howard Hawks's ''Red River'' that they're calling the Director's Cut and it is absolutely not the director's cut. It's a cut the director didn't want, an earlier cut that was junked. They assume because it was longer that it's a director's cut. Capra cut two reels off ''Lost Horizon'' because it didn't work and then someone tried to put it back. There are certainly mistakes and stupidities in reconstructing pictures.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Jones |first1=Ellen |title=Is a 'director's cut' ever a good idea? |website=[[TheGuardian.com]] |date=7 April 2011 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/apr/07/rise-of-the-directors-cut}}</ref>}}

Another way that released director's cuts can be compromised is when directors were never allowed to even shoot their vision, and thus when the film is re-cut, they must make do with the footage that exists. Examples of this include [[Terry Zwigoff]]'s ''[[Bad Santa]]'', [[Brian Helgeland]]'s ''[[Payback (1999 film)|Payback]]'', and most notably the [[Richard Donner]] re-cut of ''[[Superman II]]''. Donner completed about 75 per cent of the shooting of the sequel during the shooting of the first one but was fired from the project. [[Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut|His director's cut]] of the film includes, among other things, screen test footage of stars [[Christopher Reeve]] and [[Margot Kidder]], footage used in the first film, and entire scenes that were shot by replacement director [[Richard Lester]] which Donner dislikes but were required for story purposes.

On the other side, some critics (such as  [[Roger Ebert]]) have approved of the use of the label in unsuccessful films that had been tampered with by studio executives, such as [[Sergio Leone]]'s original cut of ''[[Once Upon a Time in America]]'',<ref name="rebertonceupon">{{cite web |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title=Once Upon a Time in America |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/once-upon-a-time-in-america-1984 |website=RogerEbert.com |publisher=Ebert Digital LLC |access-date=16 June 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130502002533/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/once-upon-a-time-in-america-1984 |archive-date=2 May 2013 |date=1 January 1984}}</ref> and the moderately successful theatrical version of ''[[Daredevil (film)|Daredevil]]'',<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cbr.com/daredevil-directors-cut-better-theatrical/ |title=Daredevil's Director's Cut Is Better Than the Theatrical Version - CBR |date=28 December 2020}}</ref> which were altered by studio interference for their theatrical release. Other well-received director's cuts include [[Ridley Scott]]'s ''[[Kingdom of Heaven (film)|Kingdom of Heaven]]'' (with ''Empire'' magazine stating: "The added 45 minutes in the Director’s Cut are like pieces missing from a beautiful but incomplete puzzle"<ref name="Kingdom">{{cite news |title=Directors Cuts, the Good, the Bad, and the Unnecessary |url=http://www.empireonline.com/movies/features/special-editions-good-bad-unnecessary/ |publisher=Empire |date=10 January 2015}}</ref>), or [[Sam Peckinpah]]'s ''[[Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid]]'', where the restored 115-minute cut is closer to the director's intent than the theatrical 105-minute cut (the actual director's cut was 122 minutes; it was never completed to Peckinpah's satisfaction, but was used as a guide for the restoration that was done after his death).

In some instances, such as [[Peter Weir]]'s ''[[Picnic at Hanging Rock (film)|Picnic at Hanging Rock]]'', [[Robert Wise]]'s ''[[Star Trek: The Motion Picture]]'', [[John Cassavetes]]'s ''[[The Killing of a Chinese Bookie]]'', [[Blake Edwards]]'s ''[[Darling Lili]]'' and [[Francis Ford Coppola]]'s [[The Godfather, Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone|''The Godfather Coda'']],<ref>{{cite web |url=https://screenrant.com/godfather-part-3-coda-ending-meaning-differences-explained/#:~:text=The%20new%20cut%20of%20The%20Godfather%20Part%20III,to%20atone,%20as%20atonement%20is%20now%20beyond%20him. |title=Godfather Part III New Ending Explained: What The Changes Mean{{!}}Screen Rant |website=[[Screen Rant]] |date=10 December 2020}}</ref> changes made to a director's cut resulted in a very similar runtime or a shorter, more compact cut. This generally happens when a distributor insists that a film be completed to meet a release date, but sometimes it is the result of removing scenes that the distributor insisted on inserting, as opposed to restoring scenes they insisted on cutting.

== Extended cuts and special editions ==
(See [[Changes in Star Wars re-releases|Changes in ''Star Wars'' re-releases]] and ''[[E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial#20th anniversary version|E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial: The 20th Anniversary]]'')

Separate to director's cuts are alternate cuts released as "special editions" or "extended cuts". These versions are often put together for home video for fans, and should not be confused with 'director's cuts'. For example, despite releasing extended versions of his ''[[The Lord of the Rings (film series)|The Lord of the Rings]]'' trilogy, [[Peter Jackson]] told IGN in 2019 that “the theatrical versions are the definitive versions, I regard the extended cuts as being a novelty for the fans that really want to see the extra material.”<ref name="rings" />

{{Quote box |quote="The traditional definition of the term 'Director's Cut' suggests the restoration of a director's original vision, free of any creative limitations. It suggests that the filmmaker has finally overcome the interference of heavy-handed studio executives, and that the film has been restored to its original, untampered form. Such is not the case with ''Alien'': The Director's Cut. It's a completely different beast."<ref name="quadrilogy">{{Cite AV media |people=[[Ridley Scott]] ([[Film director|Director]]) |date=December 2, 2003 |title=[[Alien Quadrilogy]] |medium=DVD booklet |publisher=[[20th Century Fox]] Home Entertainment, Inc |location=[[Los Angeles]]}}</ref> |source=—Ridley Scott |align=right |salign=right |width=25%}}
James Cameron has shared similar sentiments regarding the special editions of his films, "What I put into theaters is the Director's Cut. Nothing was cut that I didn't want cut. All the extra scenes we've added back in are just a bonus for the fans." Similar statements were made by Ridley Scott for the 2003 'director's cut' of ''[[Alien (film)|Alien]]''.<ref name="quadrilogy"/>

Such alternate versions sometimes include changes to the special effects in addition to different editing, such as [[George Lucas]]'s ''[[Star Wars]]'' films, and [[Steven Spielberg]]'s ''[[E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial]]''.

Extended or special editions can also apply to films that have been extended for television or cut out to fill time slots and long advertisement breaks, against the explicit wishes of the director, such as the TV versions of ''[[Dune (1984 film)|Dune]]'' (1984),<ref>{{cite web |url=https://thisorthatedition.com/dune-1984/ |title=Dune (1984) - Theatrical or Extended? This or That Edition |date=2 May 2016 |website=thisorthatedition.com |access-date=9 January 2021 |archive-date=11 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210111170318/https://thisorthatedition.com/dune-1984/ |url-status=dead}}</ref> ''[[The Warriors (film)|The Warriors]]'' (1979), ''[[Superman (1978 film)|Superman]]'' (1978) and the ''[[Harry Potter (films)|Harry Potter]]'' films.

=== Examples of alternate cuts  ===
''The Lord of the Rings'' film series directed by Peter Jackson saw an "Extended Edition" release for each of the three films ''[[The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring|The Fellowship of the Ring]]'' (2001), ''[[The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers|The Two Towers]]'' (2002), and ''[[The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King|The Return of the King]]'' (2003) featuring an additional 30 minutes, 47 minutes and 51 minutes respectively of new scenes, special effects and music alongside fan-club credits. These versions of the films were not Jackson's preferred edit, however, they were simply extended versions for fans to enjoy at home.<ref name="McCormick"/>

''[[Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice]]'' directed by [[Zack Snyder]] had an "Ultimate Edition," which added back 31 minutes of footage cut for the theatrical release and received an R rating, released digitally on 28 June 2016, and on Blu-ray on 19 July 2016.

The film ''[[Justice League (film)|Justice League]]'' which suffered a very troubled production, was begun by Snyder, who completed a pre-postproduction director's cut but had to step down before completing the project due to his daughter's death. [[Joss Whedon]] was hired by the films' distributor [[Warner Bros. Pictures]] to complete the film, which was however heavily re-shot, re-edited and released in 2017 with Snyder retaining the directorial credit, to negative reception from general audience, fans and critics alike and a box office failure. Following a global fan campaign to which the director and members of the cast and crew showed support, Snyder was allowed to return and complete the project the way he intended it and a 4-hour version of the film dubbed ''[[Zack Snyder's Justice League]]'' with some additionally shot scenes at the end was released on March 18, 2021, on [[HBO Max]] to more favorable reviews than the original version.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-56415738 |title=Zack Snyder's Justice League: A 'vindication' of director's vision, says critics |work=BBC |date=16 March 2021 |author=n.a.}}</ref> Snyder originally teased a 214-minute cut of the film that was supposed to be the theatrical version released in 2017 if he did not step down from the project.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Colbert |first1=Stephen M. |title=Zack Snyder Teases MORE Justice League Reshoots With Batman and Superman |url=https://screenrant.com/zack-snyder-justice-league-additional-photography-reshoots/ |access-date=29 March 2022 |work=ScreenRant |agency=ScreenRant |date=29 February 2020}}</ref>
Snyder has also confirmed that his Netflix distributed sci-fi film ''[[Rebel Moon|Rebel Moon – Part One: A Child of Fire]]'' (2023) and its sequel ''[[Rebel Moon – Part Two: The Scargiver]]'' (2024) would receive [[Motion Picture Association film rating system#R|R-rated]] director's cuts with its new titles ''Rebel Moon – Chapter One: Chalice of Blood'', and the sequel ''Rebel Moon – Chapter Two: Curse of Forgiveness'' (both 2024). The [[Motion Picture Association film rating system#PG-13|PG-13]] initial versions of those films having been critically panned.<ref>{{cite podcast |url=https://open.spotify.com/episode/5iVrWITh8mA1WOa986kDan |title=Rebel Moon: Part One – A Child of Fire with Zack Snyder and Louis Leterrier (Ep. 464) |website=[[Spotify]] |publisher=The Director's Cut – A DGA Podcast |date=January 9, 2024 |access-date=January 16, 2024 |archive-date=January 17, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240117003001/https://open.spotify.com/episode/5iVrWITh8mA1WOa986kDan |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Rebel Moon – Chapter One: Chalice of Blood |url=https://www.filmratings.com/Search?filmTitle=Rebel+Moon+-+Chapter+One%3A+Chalice+Of+Blood&x=0&y=0 |access-date=1 May 2024 |website=[[FilmRatings.com]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/rebel_moon_part_two_the_scargiver |title=Rebel Moon: Part Two - the Scargiver &#124; Rotten Tomatoes |website=[[Rotten Tomatoes]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/rebel_moon_part_1_a_child_of_fire |title=Rebel Moon: Part One - A Child of Fire &#124; Rotten Tomatoes |website=[[Rotten Tomatoes]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=D'Alessandro |first=Anthony |date=11 June 2024 |title=‘Rebel Moon’: Zack Snyder’s Director’s Cuts Set Late Summer Launch On Netflix |url=https://deadline.com/2024/06/rebel-moon-directors-cut-netflix-release-date-1235970038/ |website=[[Deadline Hollywood]]}}</ref>

The film ''[[Caligula (film)|Caligula]]'' exists in at least 10 different officially released versions, ranging from a sub-90-minute television edit version of TV-14 (later TV-MA) for cable television to an unrated full pornographic version exceeding 3.5 hours. This is believed to be the largest amount of distinct versions of a single film. Among major studio films, the record is believed to be held by ''[[Blade Runner]]''; the magazine ''[[Video Watchdog]]'' counted no less than seven distinct versions in a 1993 issue, before director Ridley Scott later released a "Final Cut" in 2007 to acclaim from critics including [[Roger Ebert]] who included it on his great movies list,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-blade-runner-the-final-cut-1982 |title=Blade Runner: The Final Cut movie review (1982){{!}}Roger Ebert}}</ref> The release of ''Blade Runner: The Final Cut'' brings the supposed grand total to eight differing versions of ''Blade Runner''.

Upon its release on DVD and Blu-ray in 2019, ''[[Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald]]'' featured an extended cut with seven minutes of additional footage. This is the first time since ''[[Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (film)|Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets]]'' that a [[Wizarding World]] film has had one.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://sciencefiction.com/2019/01/18/fantastic-beasts-crimes-grindelwald-getting-extended-cut/ |title='Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes Of Grindelwald' Is Getting An Extended Cut - ScienceFiction.com |date=18 January 2019}}</ref>

An animated example of an extended cut without the approval of the director<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.cartoonbrew.com/dvd/john-kortys-twice-upon-a-time-coming-to-home-video-exclusive-109606.html |title=Exclusive: John Korty's 'Twice Upon A Time' Coming To Home Video |first=Amid |author-link=Amid Amidi |last=Amidi |date=26 February 2015 |website=Cartoon Brew}}</ref> was 1983's ''[[Twice Upon a Time (1983 film)|Twice Upon a Time]]'', which was extended to have more profanity (supervised by co-writer and producer [[Bill Couturié]]) as opposed to co-director [[John Korty]]'s original.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.cineaste.com/spring2016/twice-upon-a-time |title=Twice Upon a Time |website=Cineaste Magazine}}</ref>

The [[Coen Brothers]]' ''[[Blood Simple]]'' is one of few examples that demonstrate director's cuts are not necessarily longer.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/blood-simple-15th-anniversary-2000 |title=Blood Simple movie review & film summary (1985){{!}}Roger Ebert}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/2672/blood-simple-directors-cut/ |title=Blood Simple - DVD Talk}}</ref>

== Music videos ==
{{More citations needed section|date=February 2022}}
The music video for the 2006 [[Academy Awards|Academy Award]]-nominated song "[[Listen (Beyoncé Knowles song)|Listen]]", performed by [[Beyoncé]], received a director's cut by [[Diane Martel]]. This version of the video was later included on Knowles' ''[[B'Day Anthology Video Album]]'' (2007). [[Linkin Park]] has a director's cut version for their music video "[[Faint (song)|Faint]]" (directed by [[Mark Romanek]]) in which one of the band members spray paints the words "En Proceso" on a wall, as well as Hoobastank also having one for 2004's "The Reason" which omits the woman getting hit by the car. [[Britney Spears]]' music video for 2007's "[[Gimme More]]" was first released as a director's cut on [[iTunes Store|iTunes]], with the official video released 3 days later. Many other director's cut music videos contain [[sexual content]] that can't be shown on TV thus creating alternative scenes, such as [[Thirty Seconds to Mars]]'s "[[Hurricane (Thirty Seconds to Mars song)|Hurricane]]", and in some cases, alternative videos, such as in the case of Spears' 2008 video for "[[Womanizer (song)|Womanizer]]".

== Expanded usage in pop culture ==
As the trend became more widely recognized, the term ''director's cut'' became increasingly used as a [[colloquialism]] to refer to an expanded version of other things, including video games, music, and comic books. This confusing usage only served to further reduce the artistic value of a director's cut, and it is currently rarely used in those ways.

=== Video games ===
{{More citations needed section|date=February 2022}}
For video games, these expanded versions, also referred as "complete editions", will have additions to the gameplay or additional game modes and features outside the main portion of the game.

As is the case with certain high-profile Japanese-produced games, the game designers may take the liberty to revise their product for the overseas market with additional features during the [[software localization|localization]] process. These features are later added back to the native market in a re-release of a game in what is often referred as the international version of the game. This was the case with the overseas versions of ''[[Final Fantasy VII]]'', ''[[Metal Gear Solid (1998 video game)|Metal Gear Solid]]'' and ''[[Rogue Galaxy]]'', which contained additional features (such as new difficulty settings for ''Metal Gear Solid''), resulting in re-released versions of those respective games in Japan (''[[Final Fantasy VII#Development|Final Fantasy VII International]]'', ''[[Metal Gear Solid: Integral]]'' and ''[[Rogue Galaxy#Localization Improvements|Rogue Galaxy: Director's Cut]]''). In the case of ''[[Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty]]'' and ''[[Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater]]'', the American versions were released first, followed by the Japanese versions and then the European versions, with each regional release offering new content not found in the previous one. All of the added content from the Japanese and European versions of those games were included in the expanded editions titled ''[[Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty#Substance|Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance]]'' and ''[[Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater#Subsistence|Metal Gear Solid 3: Subsistence]]''.

They also, similar to movies, will occasionally include extra, uncensored or alternate versions of cutscenes, as was the case with ''[[Resident Evil: Code Veronica X]]''. In markets with strict censorship, a later relaxing of those laws occasional will result in the game being rereleased with the "Special/Uncut Edition" tag added to differentiate between the originally released censored version and the current uncensored edition.

Several of the ''Pokémon'' games have also received director's cuts and have used the term "extension", though "remake" and "third version" are also often used by many fans. These include ''[[Pocket Monsters: Blue]]'' (Japan only), ''[[Pokémon Yellow]]'' (for ''Pokémon Red'' and ''Green''/''Blue''), ''[[Pokémon Crystal]]'' (for [[Pokémon Gold and Silver|''Pokémon Gold'' and ''Silver'']]), ''[[Pokémon Emerald]]'' (for [[Pokémon Ruby and Sapphire|''Pokémon Ruby'' and ''Sapphire'']]), ''[[Pokémon Platinum]]'' (for ''[[Pokémon Diamond and Pearl|''Pokémon Diamond'' and ''Pearl'']]'') and [[Pokémon Ultra Sun and Ultra Moon|''Pokémon Ultra Sun'' and ''Ultra Moon'']].

For their [[PlayStation 5]] "Director's Cut" releases of the [[PlayStation 4]] games ''[[Ghost of Tsushima]]''<ref>{{Cite news |last=Parkin |first=Simon |date=2021-09-04 |title=Ghost of Tsushima: Directors' Cut review – rich treasures on a new island |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/games/2021/sep/04/ghost-of-tsushima-directors-cut-review |access-date=2023-07-29 |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> and ''[[Death Stranding]]''<ref>{{Cite web |last=Tristan |first=Ogilvie |date=2021-09-23 |title=Death Stranding Director's Cut Review |url=https://www.ign.com/articles/death-stranding-directors-cut-ps5-review |access-date=2023-07-29 |website=IGN |language=en}}</ref> both received expanded features on both games.

=== Music ===
"Director's cuts" in music are rarely released. A few exceptions include [[Guided by Voices]]' 1994 album ''[[Bee Thousand]]'', which was [[re-released]] as a three disc [[vinyl LP]] director's cut in 2004, and [[Fall Out Boy]]'s 2003 album ''[[Take This to Your Grave]]'', which was re-released as a Director's cut in 2005 with two extra [[song|tracks]].

In 2011 British singer [[Kate Bush]] released the album titled ''[[Director's Cut (Kate Bush album)|Director's Cut]]''. It is made up of songs from her earlier albums ''[[The Sensual World]]'' and ''[[The Red Shoes (album)|The Red Shoes]]'' which have been remixed and restructured, three of which were re-recorded completely.

== See also ==
{{Portal|Film}}
* [[Artistic integrity]]
* [[Cinephilia]]
* [[The Criterion Collection]]
* [[Fan edit]]
* [[Film modification]]

== References ==
{{reflist}}

==External links==
* [http://www.movie-censorship.com/ Movie-Censorship] – detailed cuts comparisons
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20020601142445/http://www.mediacircus.net/dc.html Director's Cuts: Do They Make the Cut?] – Anthony Leong
* [https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=336&dat=19981204&id=OelWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ROwDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5295,1605791 If Movie Seems too Long, Blame It on the Director] – Chris Hicks
* [https://gdrhodes.medium.com/the-rise-and-falling-rise-of-the-directors-cut-b58573229aa3 The Rise and Falling Rise of the Director’s Cut] – [[Gary D. Rhodes]]

[[Category:Versions of works]]
[[Category:Alternative versions of films| ]]
[[Category:Film and video terminology]]
[[Category:Film post-production]]
[[Category:Film production]]
[[Category:Video game terminology]]
[[Category:Video game development]]