Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Economic base analysis
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{redirect-distinguish|Economic base|Base and superstructure}} '''Economic base analysis''' is a theory that posits that activities in an area divide into two categories: basic and nonbasic. Basic industries are those exporting from the region and bringing wealth from outside, while nonbasic (or service) industries support basic industries. Because export-import flows are usually not tracked at sub-national (regional) levels, it is not practical to study industry output and trade flows to and from a region. As an alternative, the concepts of basic and nonbasic are operationalized using employment data. The theory was developed by [[Robert Murray Haig]] in his work on the [[Regional Plan of New York]] in 1928. ==Application of the analysis== The basic industries of a region are identified by comparing employment in the region to national norms. If the national norm for employment in, for example, [[Arghul|Egyptian woodwind]] manufacturing is 5 percent and the region's employment is 8 percent, then 3 percent of the region's woodwind employment is basic. Once basic employment is identified, the outlook for basic employment is investigated sector by sector and projections made sector by sector. In turn, this permits the projection of total employment in the region. Typically the basic/nonbasic employment ratio is about 1:1. Extending by manipulation of data and comparisons, conjectures may be made about population and income. This is a rough, serviceable procedure, and it remains in use today. It has the advantage of being readily operationalized, fiddled with, and understandable. ==Formula== The formula for computing location quotients can be written as: <math>LQ = \frac{e_i/e}{E_i/E}</math> Where: <math>e_i =</math> Local employment in industry i <math>e =</math> Total local employment <math>E_i =</math> Reference area employment in industry i <math>E =</math> Total reference area employment It is assumed that the base year is identical in all of the above variables. ==Example and methodology== Economic base ideas can be easy to understand, as are measures made of employment. For instance, it is well known that the economy of [[Seattle, Washington]] is tied to aircraft manufacturing, that of [[Detroit|Detroit, Michigan]], to automobiles, and that of [[Silicon Valley]] to high-tech manufacturing. When newspapers discuss the closing of military bases, they may say something like: "5,000 jobs at the base will be lost. That's going to hit the economy hard because it means a loss of 10,000 jobs in the community." To forecast, the main procedure is to compare the region with the nation and national trends. If the economic base of a region is in industries that are declining nationwide, then the region faces a problem. If its economic base is concentrated in sectors that are growing, then it is in good shape. Methodologically, economic base analysis views the region as if it were a small nation and uses notions of relative and comparative advantage from international trade theory ([[Charles Tiebout]] 1963). In a sense, the activity is macroeconomics "written small", and it has not been of much interest to urban economists in recent years because it does not get at within-city relationships. The analysis usually takes US growth patterns as a given. The fates of regions are determined by trends in the national economy. ==Assumptions== As H. Craig Davis points out, there are a number of assumptions on which economic base analysis is conducted. These include (1) that exports are the sole source of economic growth (investment, government spending, and household consumption are ignored); (2) that the export industry is homogeneous (i.e., that an increase or decrease of one export does not affect another); (3) the constancy of the export/service ratio; (4) that there is no inter-regional feedback; and (5) that there is a pool of underutilized resources.<ref name="Davis">Davis, H. Craig, ''Regional Impact Analysis and Project Evaluation'', UBC Press, 1990.</ref> ==References== {{Citation| last=Quintero | first= James Paul | date= 2007 | title= Regional Economic Development: An Economic Base Study and Shift and Shares Analysis of Hays County, Texas | type= Applied Research Project, Masters Program | publisher= Texas State University San Marcos | id= Paper 259 | url= http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/259/ | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080526081005/http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/259/ | archive-date= 26 May 2008 }} <references /> [[Category:Regional economics]] [[Category:History of economic thought]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Citation
(
edit
)
Template:Redirect-distinguish
(
edit
)