Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Ethical calculus
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Application of mathematics to calculate issues in ethics}} An '''ethical calculus''' is the application of [[mathematics]] to [[calculate]] issues in [[ethics]]. ==Scope== Generally, ethical calculus refers to any method of determining a course of action in a circumstance that is not explicitly evaluated in one's [[ethical code]]. A formal philosophy of ethical calculus is a development in the study of [[ethics]], combining elements of [[natural selection]], [[self-organizing systems]], [[emergence]], and [[algorithm]] theory. According to ethical calculus, the most ethical course of action in a situation is an absolute, but rather than being based on a static ethical code, the ethical code itself is a function of circumstances. The optimal ethic is the best possible course of action taken by an individual with the given limitations. While ethical calculus is, in some ways, similar to [[moral relativism]], the former finds its grounds in the circumstance while the latter depends on social and cultural context for moral judgment. Ethical calculus would most accurately be regarded as a form of dynamic [[moral absolutism]]. Ethical calculus is not to be confused with [[ethics in mathematics]] or [[ethics of quantification]] which study the moral questions coming from mathematical practice and quantification in society. ==Examples== Francis Hutcheson devoted a section of his 1725 work ''Inquiry into the Original of our ideas and Beauty and Virtue'' to "an attempt to introduce a Mathematical Calculation in subjects of Morality". Formulas included:<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=YRurAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA173 Page 173] in: {{cite book|chapter=The Invention of the Ethical Calculus|title=Seventeenth Century Studies in the History of English Thought and Literature from Bacon to Pope|year=1951|author=R. F. Jones|publisher=Stanford University Press}}</ref> * M = B Γ A where, *M is the moral importance of any agent *B is the [[wikt:benevolence|benevolence]] of the agent *A is the ability of the agent Another example is the [[felicific calculus]] formulated by [[utilitarianism|utilitarian]] philosopher [[Jeremy Bentham]] for calculating the degree or amount of [[pleasure]] that a specific action is likely to cause.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Bentham |first=Jeremy |title=An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation |publisher=Dover Publications Inc. |year=2007 |isbn=978-0486454528}}</ref> Bentham, an [[ethics|ethical]] [[hedonist]], believed the moral rightness or wrongness of an action to be a function of the amount of pleasure or pain that it produced. The felicific calculus could, in principle at least, determine the moral status of any considered act. == See also == *[[Ethics]] *[[Felicific calculus]] *[[Formal ethics]] *[[Moral absolutism]] *[[Morality]] *[[Science of morality]] ==References== {{reflist}} [[Category:Ethical principles]] [[Category:Utilitarianism]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)