Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Existential fallacy
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|Type of formal fallacy}} {{More footnotes|date=November 2010}} The '''existential fallacy''', or '''[[existential instantiation]]''', is a [[formal fallacy]]. In the existential fallacy, one presupposes that a class has members when one is not supposed to do so; i.e., when one should not assume [[existential import]]. Not to be confused with the '[[Affirming the consequent]]', as in "If A, then B. B. Therefore A". One example would be: "''Every unicorn has a horn on its forehead''". It does not imply that there are any unicorns at all in the world, and thus it cannot be assumed that, if the statement were true, somewhere there is a unicorn in the world (with a horn on its forehead). The statement, if assumed true, implies only that if there were any unicorns, each would definitely have a horn on its forehead. ==Overview== An existential fallacy is committed in a medieval [[categorical syllogism]] because it has two universal premises and a particular conclusion with no assumption that at least one member of the class exists, an assumption which is not established by the premises. In modern logic, the presupposition that a class has members is seen as unacceptable. In 1905, [[Bertrand Russell]] wrote an essay entitled "The Existential Import of Proposition", in which he called this Boolean approach "[[Giuseppe Peano|Peano]]'s interpretation". The fallacy does not occur in [[enthymeme]]s, where hidden premises required to make the [[syllogism]] valid assume the existence of at least one member of the class.{{citation needed|date=February 2014}} ==Examples== * All trespassers will be prosecuted. * Therefore, some of those prosecuted will have trespassed.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.fallacyfiles.org/existent.html|title=Logical Fallacy: The Existential Fallacy|website=www.fallacyfiles.org}}</ref> This is a fallacy because the first statement does not require the existence of any actual trespassers (stating only what would happen if some do exist), and therefore does not prove the existence of any. Note that this is a fallacy whether or not anyone has trespassed. == See also == * [[Affirming the consequent]] * [[Quantifier (logic)]] * [[Vacuous truth]] ==References== {{reflist}} ==External links== *[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/existent.html Fallacy files: existential fallacy] *[https://web.archive.org/web/20040623081418/http://www.swif.uniba.it/lei/foldop/foldoc.cgi?existential+fallacy FOLDOC: existential fallacy] {{Formal Fallacy}} [[Category:Syllogistic fallacies]] [[Category:Quantificational fallacies]] {{logic-stub}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Citation needed
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Formal Fallacy
(
edit
)
Template:Logic-stub
(
edit
)
Template:More footnotes
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)