Editing Expanding bullet

{{Short description|Bullets that expand on impact with a solid object}}
{{Redirect|Dumdum||Dum Dum (disambiguation)}}
[[File:Express bullets 1870.gif|upright=1.5|thumb|Drawings from 1870 of a hollow point express rifle bullet before firing (1, 2) and after recovery from the game animal (3, 4, 5), showing expansion and fragmentation]]
[[File:Wundbalistik DumDumGeschoß 001.jpg|thumb|right|Leg wound by an expanding bullet]]

'''Expanding bullets''', also known colloquially as '''dumdum bullets''', are [[projectile]]s designed to expand on [[terminal ballistics|impact]]. This causes the bullet to increase in diameter, to combat over-penetration and produce a larger wound, thus dealing more damage to a living target. For this reason, they are used for hunting and by police departments,<ref name="SAAMI226"/> but are generally prohibited for use in war.<ref name="Declaration"/> Two typical designs are the [[hollow-point bullet]] and the [[soft-point bullet]].

==Function and use==
Expanding bullets are designed to expand on impact, sometimes as much as twice the diameter.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.federalpremium.com/downloads/education/FP583_2013AmmoBasicsCHANGE0513.pdf |title=Federal Premium Ammunition: ''Ammunition Basics'' |access-date=2014-10-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924011501/http://www.federalpremium.com/downloads/education/FP583_2013AmmoBasicsCHANGE0513.pdf |archive-date=2015-09-24 }}</ref> This will slow the bullet down and more of its [[kinetic energy]] will be transferred to the target, creating a larger wound channel. For this reason, expanding bullets are often used in hunting because their [[stopping power]] increases the chance of a quick kill. There are a number of designs used for hunting different [[game (food)|game]] and for use in weapons with different [[muzzle velocity|muzzle velocities]]. Bullets used for medium and large game need better penetration, which means bullets designed to maintain integrity and for less expansion.<ref>[http://www.hornady.com/ballistics-resource/terminal Hornady: ''Terminal Ballistics'']</ref> The velocities at which the bullets hit affect their expansion and penetration.<ref>[http://www.norma.cc/us/Ammunition-Academy/Expansion/hastighetens-betydelse/ Norma: ''Impact of speed'']</ref>

Expanding bullets are less likely to pass through the target, and if they do, they will exit at a lower velocity. This reduces the risk of accidental injury to bystanders. For this reason, and to maximize the stopping effect, law enforcement organizations use expanding bullets.<ref name="SAAMI226">[https://web.archive.org/web/20101222190518/http://saami.org/specifications_and_information/publications/download/SAAMI_ITEM_226-A_Technical_Overview_of_Ammunition_Types_Characteristics_and_Issues.pdf Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute: ''A Technical Overview of Ammunition Types, Characteristics and Issues'']</ref> Even then, some penetration is needed, e.g., to penetrate a windshield or heavy clothing.<ref>[http://www.firearmsid.com/Bullets/bullet2.htm Firearmsid.com: ''Bullet Basics 2- Shapes'']</ref> Such a bullet would have less possibility of penetrating [[Body armor|body armour]] or heavy equipment worn on the body.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Association |first=National Rifle |title=An Official Journal Of The NRA {{!}} Overpenetration |url=https://www.shootingillustrated.com/content/overpenetration/ |access-date=2023-09-27 |website=An Official Journal Of The NRA |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-06-17 |title=The Curious Case Of The Over-Penetrating Round {{!}} Gun Carrier |url=https://blog.gunassociation.org/the-curious-case-of-the-over-penetrating-round/ |access-date=2023-09-27 |website=blog.gunassociation.org |language=en-US}}</ref>

==Names==
[[File:18961219-Br Med J 1896;2-1810-Dum Dum Bullets Composite Image.JPG|thumb|Composite image of the [[The BMJ|British Medical Journal]] article describing [[Neville Bertie-Clay|Capt Bertie-Clay]]'s new type of bullet (British Medical Journal 1896;2:1810)]]
Expanding bullets were called ''Dum-Dum'' or ''dumdum'' after an early British example produced in the [[Dum Dum Arsenal]], near [[Kolkata|Calcutta]], [[India]] by Captain [[Neville Bertie-Clay]].<ref>'The Military Bullet' ''British Medical Journal'' 1896;2:1810 (19 December 1896)</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |year=2009 |title=Dum Dum |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |url=http://www.search.eb.com/eb/article-9031421 |access-date=2009-05-18}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Dum-Dum Cartridges |url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1886/01/04/109311715.pdf |date=January 4, 1886 |work=[[The New York Times]] }}</ref> There were several expanding bullets produced by this arsenal for the [[.303 British]] cartridge, including soft-point and hollow-point designs. These were not the first expanding bullets, however; hollow-point expanding bullets were commonly used for hunting thin-skinned game in [[express rifle]]s as early as the mid-1870s.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/stream/mycommandinsouth00cuny#page/79/mode/1up|title=My Command in South Africa, 1874–1878|author1=Arthur Augustus Thurlow Cunynghame|author-link=Arthur Augustus Thurlow Cunynghame|author2=M. Balkind|publisher=Macmillan & Co.|year=1880|page=79}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/hvd.hwfxbj|title=British rural sports: comprising shooting, hunting, coursing, fishing, hawking, racing, boating, pedestrianism, with all rural games and amusements|author1=Stonehenge [pseud.]|author-link=John Henry Walsh|publisher=Frederick Warne and Co.|year=1871|page=107-109|hdl=2027/hvd.hwfxbj }}</ref>

Also, the .303 was not the first military round with that trait since the old [[.577 Snider]] bullet had a hollow core, leaving wounds known for being particularly nasty.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Gunshot Wounds in the Late Frontier War |journal=The Indian Medical Gazette |date=1899 |volume=34 |issue=February |pages=51–52 |pmid=29002215 |pmc=5145347 }}</ref> The use of the term ''dumdum'' for expanding bullets other than the early .303 designs is considered slang by most ammunition and ballistics sources.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thegunzone.com/dum-dum.html/showterm?TermID=2160 |title=The Gun Zone - Dum-dums }}{{Dead link|date=August 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pfoa.co.uk/uploads/asset_file/Dum-Dum%20Bullets_1.pdf/showterm?TermID=2160 |publisher=Police Firearm Officers Association |title=Dum-dum Bullets }}{{Dead link|date=August 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Manufacturers have many terms to describe the particular construction of the various types of expanding bullets, though most fall into the category of soft-point or hollow-point designs. The expansion itself is sometimes called ''mushrooming''.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Module 10 :: Mushrooming |url=https://projects.nfstc.org/firearms/module10/fir_m10_t09_05_a.htm#:~:text=Mushrooming%20is%20the%20controlled%20expansion%20of%20a%20bullet,of%20all%20bullet%20energy%20to%20the%20intended%20target. |access-date=2023-09-27 |website=projects.nfstc.org}}</ref>

Another early name was [[William Tweedie|General Tweedie]]'s "''mushroom bullet''", cited in ''[[The New York Times]]'' in 1892.<ref>{{cite news
| title=The New Mushroom Bullet
| work=New York Times
| date=June 15, 1892
| url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1892/06/15/104136206.pdf
| access-date=September 7, 2010}}</ref>

==History==
[[File:1.-Weltkrieg Propaganda Darstellung französischer Dum-Dum-Geschosse ca. 1916.jpg|thumb|German WWI propaganda: French Dum-Dum bullets ({{circa}} 1916)]]
[[File:Expanding bullet after firing.jpg|thumb|Expanded [[.458 Winchester Magnum|.458]] hunting round (next to a Ugandan 500-shilling coin [23.5 mm diameter] for size reference), after killing an [[African buffalo]]]]

Early bullets were typically made in the form of spheres of nearly pure [[lead]], which is a very soft metal. These would often flatten upon impact with the target, causing a wound larger than the original diameter of the ball. The adoption of [[rifling]] allowed the use of longer, heavier bullets, but these were still typically constructed of soft lead and would often double in diameter upon impact. In this case expansion was a side effect of materials, and there is no evidence that the bullets were designed to expand upon impact.<ref name="whelen">{{cite book |title=The American Rifle |url=https://archive.org/details/americanrifletre00whel |author=Townsend Whelen |pages=[https://archive.org/details/americanrifletre00whel/page/364 364]–366 |publisher=Century Co. |year=1918}}</ref>

The earliest examples of bullets specifically designed to expand on impact were those fired by [[express rifle]]s, which were developed in the mid-19th century. Express rifles used larger powder charges and lighter bullets than typical for the time to achieve very high velocities for [[black powder]] cartridges. One method of lightening the bullets used was to provide a deep cavity in the nose of the bullet. These were the first hollow-point bullets, and in addition to developing higher velocities, they also expanded significantly upon impact. These hollow-point bullets worked well on thin-skinned game, but tended to come apart on bigger game, resulting in insufficient penetration. One solution to this was the "cruciform expanding bullet", a solid bullet with a cross-shaped incision in the tip. This split section expanded only to the depth of the incision, making it an early form of controlled expansion bullet.<ref name="greener">{{cite book |title=The gun and its development |author=William Wellington Greener |pages=223–224 |publisher=Cassell |year=1885}}</ref>

In the late 19th century, the invention of [[cordite]] and other [[nitrocellulose]]-based "[[smokeless powder|smokeless]]" propellants permitted higher bullet-velocities than black powder, resulting in flatter trajectories and correspondingly higher hit probabilities. Attempts to limit [[recoil]] to an acceptable level led to higher-velocity rounds generally being smaller in diameter and lighter. To prevent lead [[fouling]] in the [[Gauge (firearms)|bore]] caused by the higher pressures and velocities, soft lead bullets were replaced by newly introduced [[full metal jacket bullet]]s.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.midwayusa.com/guntecdictionary.exe/showterm?TermID=3039 |title=lead fouling |publisher=Midway USA GunTec Dictionary |access-date=2008-10-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110928120435/http://www.midwayusa.com/guntecdictionary.exe/showterm?TermID=3039 |archive-date=2011-09-28 }}</ref>

However, it soon became apparent that such hard, small-caliber rounds were less effective at wounding or killing an enemy than the older, large-caliber soft [[lead]] [[bullet]]s. Within the [[British Indian Army]], the [[Dum Dum Arsenal]] produced a solution: the jacketing was removed from the nose of the bullet, creating the first [[soft-point bullet]]s. Since the Mark II jacket did not cover the base of the round, this could potentially lead to the jacketing being left in the barrel. This potential problem resulted in the rejection of the Dum Dum design and led to independent development of the Mark III, Mark IV (1897) and Mark V (1899) [[.303 British]] rounds, which were of the hollow-point design, with the jacket covering the base; while these were made in Britain, not at the Dum Dum Arsenal, the name "Dum-dum" had already become associated with expanding bullets, and continued to be used to refer to any expanding bullets. The expanding bullets expanded upon impact to a diameter significantly greater than the original .312&nbsp;inch (7.92&nbsp;mm) bullet diameter, producing larger diameter wounds than the full-metal-jacketed versions. The Mark IV was successful enough in its first use in the [[Battle of Omdurman]] that British soldiers issued with the standard Mark II bullets began to remove the top of the jacket, converting the Mark II bullets into improvised Dum-dum types.<ref name="Dum Dums">{{cite web |url=http://www.thegunzone.com/dum-dum.html |title=Dum Dums |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080925190004/http://www.thegunzone.com/dum-dum.html |archive-date=2008-09-25 }}</ref>

In 1898, the German government lodged a protest against the use of the Mark IV bullet, claiming the wounds produced by the Mark IV were excessive and inhumane, thus violating the [[Law of war|laws of war]]. The protest, however, was based on the comparison of the wounds produced by expanding and non-expanding bullets from high-velocity sporting rifles, rather than on comparison of the expanding .303 British bullets with the previous, large-bore service cartridge it replaced, the [[.577/450 Martini-Henry]].<ref>{{cite journal |journal=Concord |date=August 1899 |title=The Defence of the Dum-dum |author=International Arbitration and Peace Association |publisher=Published by T.M. Ndze |page=129}} "I speak of the experiments made at Tubingen by Prof. Bruns, of which a report has been published in the Beitrage zur Klinischen Chirurigie at Tubingen in 1898. The ball then used had a lead point almost a diameter longer than the case, and, consequently, the expansion and flattening in penetrating a body were considerable, and the wounds excessively severe."</ref> With the energy on impact roughly the same, the wounds caused by the expanding bullet of the .303 were less severe than those caused by the larger-caliber, solid lead bullet used by the Martini-Henry.<ref>{{cite book |title=Parliamentary Debates: Senate and House of Representatives |author=India Parliament |author2=New South Wales Parliament |author3=Australia Parliament |author4=Legislative Council |author5=Parliament |author6=Victoria |publisher=Commonwealth Govt. Printer |year=1903 |page=4227}} "In the dum-dum bullet the jacket ends by leaving a small piece of the core uncovered. The effect of this modification is to produce a certain extension or convexity of the point, and to give a force more pronounced than that of a bullet which is completely jacketed, at the same time, however, less effective than that of the Enfield, Snider, or Martini bullets, all of which have greater calibre."</ref>

The German protests were effective, however, resulting in the ban of the use of expanding bullets in warfare. The British replaced the hollow-point bullets with new full metal jacket bullets and used the remaining stocks of expanding bullets for practice.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1901/mar/21/rejected-mark-iv-bullets#S4V0091P0-01962 |work=[[Hansard|Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)]] |date=21 March 1901 |title=REJECTED MARK IV. BULLETS.}}, "These bullets have been made up into cartridges, which are being used for practice purposes."</ref>

During the [[Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907#Hague Convention of 1899|Hague Convention of 1899]], the majority of the delegates moved to prohibit future usage of expanding bullets, which was opposed by the American and British delegations. Historian [[Barbara W. Tuchman|Barbara Tuchman]] wrote that, 

{{quote|Developed by the British to stop the rush of fanatical tribesmen, the bullets were vigorously defended by [[John Charles Ardagh|Sir John Ardagh]] against the heated attack of all except the American military delegate, Captain Crozier, whose country was about to make use of them [[Philippine–American War|in the Philippines]]. In warfare against savages, Ardagh explained to an absorbed audience, "men penetrated through and through several times by our latest pattern of small calibre projectiles, which make small clean holes", were nevertheless able to rush on and come to close quarters. Some means had to be found to stop them. "The civilized soldier when shot recognizes that he is wounded and knows that the sooner he is attended to the sooner he will recover. He lies down on his stretcher and is taken off the field to his ambulance, where he is dressed or bandaged. Your fanatical barbarian, similarly wounded, continues to rush on, spear or sword in hand; and before you have the time to represent to him that his conduct is in flagrant violation of the understanding relative to the proper course for the wounded man to follow—he may have cut off your head."<ref name="Tuchman 2014">{{cite book |last=Tuchman |first=Barbara |title=The Proud Tower |year=2014 |orig-date=1962 |publisher=Penguin |location=UK |isbn=978-0-241-96825-3 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Lh3QAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT293 293]}}</ref>}} 

However, the rest of the delegates at the 1899 Hague Convention were not persuaded by Ardagh's arguments and voted 22–2 to prohibit the future use of the dumdum bullet.<ref name="Tuchman 2014"/>

==International law==
[[Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907|The Hague Convention]] of 1899, Declaration III prohibits the use of expanding bullets in international warfare.<ref name="Declaration">Hague Convention [http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/dec99-03.asp Declaration III] – On the Use of Bullets Which Expand or Flatten Easily in the Human Body. July 29, 1899.</ref><ref name="Weaponslaw">[http://www.weaponslaw.org/weapons/expanding-bullets "Expanding bullets"]. ''Weapons Law Encyclopedia''.</ref> This is often incorrectly believed to be prohibited by the [[Geneva Conventions]], but it significantly predates those conventions, and is in fact a continuance of the [[Saint Petersburg Declaration of 1868]], which had earlier banned exploding projectiles of less than {{Convert|400|g|oz|abbr=off}}.

The text of the declaration states, "The present Declaration is only binding for the Contracting Powers in the case of a war between two or more of them".<ref name="Declaration"/> Until relatively recently, the prohibition on the use of expanding bullets was applicable only to international armed conflicts between the countries that have signed it. According to the [[International Committee of the Red Cross]]'s [[customary international law]] study, customary international law now prohibits their use in any armed conflicts.<ref name="Weaponslaw" /><ref name="ICRC Customary">{{cite web |title=ICRC |url=http://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule77 |work=Customary International Law Study}}</ref> This has been disputed by the [[United States]], which maintains that the use of expanding bullets can be legal when there is a clear [[military necessity]].<ref name="ICRC Customary"/> The adoption of an amendment to Article 8 at the [[Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court|Review Conference of the Rome Statute in Kampala]] (2010) makes the use of expanding bullets in non-international armed conflict a [[war crime]].<ref name="Weaponslaw" /><ref>{{cite web |title=Kampala Review Conference |url=http://www.kampala.icc-cpi.info/ |access-date=2011-09-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721205732/http://www.kampala.icc-cpi.info/ |archive-date=2011-07-21 }}</ref> One example of a war crime involving expanding ammunition is the August 1941 German killing of Soviet prisoners at [[Zhytomyr|Zhitomir]], as a [[Nazi human experimentation|human experiment]] with captured [[Red Army]] [[materiel]].<ref>Michael Burleigh (1997). ''Ethics and extermination: reflections on Nazi genocide''. Cambridge University Press. p. 71. {{ISBN|978-0-521-58816-4}}. Retrieved 20 March 2011. "Inhumane treatment of Soviet prisoners included proceedings at Shitomir in August 1941 where a group of them were shot with captured Red Army dum-dum bullets so that German military doctors could precisely observe, and write up, the effects of these munitions upon the human body". (See Streim reference below for original source.)</ref>

Because The Hague Convention applies only to the use of expanding bullets in war, the use of expanding rounds remains legal in other circumstances unless it is restricted or prohibited by local laws. Examples are use of expanding bullets in hunting in which it is desirable to stop the animal quickly, either to prevent loss of a game animal or to ensure a humane death of the animal, and in law enforcement or self-defence, if quickly neutralising an aggressor may be needed to prevent further loss of life or the bullet must remain inside the target to prevent [[collateral damage]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/1984/aug/01/dum-dum-ammunition#S6CV0065P0-07728 |work=[[Hansard|Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)]] |date=1 August 1984 |title=Dum-dum Ammunition}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Hollowpoint and Law Enforcement |journal=Police Chief |volume=42 |issue=10 |date=October 1975 |author=J. A. Ulery |url=http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=35747}}</ref>

== See also ==
* [[Frangible bullet]]
* [[Glossary of firearms terminology]]
* [[Gold Dot]]
* [[Hydra-Shok]]
* [[Military necessity]]

== References ==
{{Reflist|30em}}

== External links ==
{{wikisource-inline|Wilhelm's telegraph to Wilson}}
* [http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/dec99-03.asp Laws of War: Declaration on the Use of Bullets Which Expand or Flatten Easily in the Human Body; July 29, 1899] Document on International laws of war regarding the expanding bullet
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20100817090330/http://www.diggerhistory.info/pages-weapons/303.htm#.303 The .303 British Cartridge], with information on the original Dum-Dum bullet, and the subsequent MK III through MKV hollow-point bullets.
* [http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot32.htm Dum-Dum Bullet Testing] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100318004831/http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot32.htm |date=2010-03-18 }}, with tests of dum-dum rounds fired into jugs of water.
* [http://www.norma.cc/us/Ammunition-Academy/Expansion/Bullet-Impact-Comparison/ Bullet Impact Comparison], results of bullets designed for different expansion and penetration

{{Handloading}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Expanding Bullet}}
[[Category:Bullets]]
[[Category:Paramilitary cartridges]]