Editing Free-range eggs

{{Short description|Type of egg produced from outdoor poultry}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2019}}
[[Image:FreeRangeEgg.jpg|right|thumbnail|A free-range egg purchased in the United Kingdom]]
'''Free-range eggs''' are [[Egg (food)|eggs]] produced from birds that may be permitted outdoors. The term "free-range" may be used differently depending on the country and the relevant laws, 

Eggs from hens that are only indoors might also be labelled ''cage-free'', ''barn'', ''barn-roaming'' or ''aviary'', following the [[animal happiness certification]] policies, also known as "happy [[chicken]]s" or "happy eggs". This is different from birds that are reared in systems labelled as ''[[battery cage]]s'' or ''[[furnished cages]]''.

==Legal definition==
Legal standards defining [[free range]] can be different or non-existent depending on the country. Various watchdog organizations, governmental agencies, and industry groups adhere to differing criteria regarding what constitutes a "free-range" and "cage-free" status. In Massachusetts, there was a proposal to ban the sale of meat or eggs from caged animals, regardless of where they were raised. This potential shift from caged to cage-free production has raised concerns among egg industry groups. They worry that it will lead to a significant increase in egg prices, making them unaffordable for many consumers and potentially harming the egg industry

===United States===
The [[United States Department of Agriculture]] (USDA) requires that egg producers be able to demonstrate that "free range" egg layers have access to the outdoors.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/food-safety-education/get-answers/food-safety-fact-sheets/food-labeling/meat-and-poultry-labeling-terms/meat-and-poultry-labeling-terms | title = Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms | publisher = [[United States Department of Agriculture]]: [[Food Safety and Inspection Service]] | website = fsis.usda.gov | access-date = 12 October 2015}}</ref> However, there is no government oversight as to the quality of the external environment, or the amount of time the hen has access to it.<ref>{{cite news | url = https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2014/12/23/370377902/farm-fresh-natural-eggs-not-always-what-they-re-cracked-up-to-be | first = Anders | last = Kelso | date = 23 December 2013 | website = [[NPR]] | title = Farm Fresh? Natural? Eggs Not Always What They're Cracked Up To Be | publisher = [[National Public Radio]] | access-date = 12 October 2015}}</ref> Many producers label their eggs as ''cage-free'' in addition to, or instead of, ''free-range''.<ref name="Free Range Eggs">{{cite web|title = Why Free Range Eggs|url = https://www.bagofgreens.com/free-range.html|website = Bag of Greens|access-date = 2021-02-15}}</ref> Recently, US egg labels have expanded to include the term "barn-roaming", to more accurately describe the source of those eggs that are laid by hens which can not range freely, but are confined to a barn instead of a more restrictive cage.

====Debate====
[[File:Free Range Hens - geograph.org.uk - 342791.jpg|thumb|Commercial free-range hens outdoors]]
Cage-free eggs have been a major cause of debate in the US. In 2015, there was an initiative proposed in [[Massachusetts]] that would ban the sale of in-state meat or eggs "from caged animals raised anywhere in the nation". This shift from caged to cage-free is concerning for egg industry groups because they believe that this will cause the price of eggs to increase to the point that consumers can not afford to buy them, thereby causing a decline in the egg industry overall. Animal welfare advocates argue that costs will not change as drastically as industry groups are expecting and that the price of eggs will remain almost the same because the housing of the birds does not make a huge difference in cost. Egg industry groups are making an effort to show or "educate lawmakers, voters, and consumers about the merits and cost-effectiveness of cage use". Local farmers and producers say that the shift will occur if that is what consumers want; they will adapt to having birds in or out of cages. Not only are there debates between the egg industry and animal welfare advocates, but people are also debating whether this issue has to be handled by the federal government or the industry.<ref name="POLITICO">{{cite web|title = Egg industry yielding in cage-free fight|url = http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/egg-industry-hands-animal-advocates-big-win-in-cage-free-fight-213905|website = [[Politico]]| date=21 September 2015 |access-date = 2015-10-15}}</ref>

====Growth====
The popularity of cage-free eggs in the United States has significantly increased in recent years. In 2012, approximately 5% of U.S. egg-laying hens were kept in cage-free systems. As of March 2024, this figure had risen to 40%. While cage-free systems are not without their challenges, the industry appears to be transitioning towards this model as the dominant standard. Several U.S. states have enacted or are considering legislation banning the sale of eggs from conventionally caged hens. California, for instance, has already implemented such a ban. Major industry players, such as [[Cal-Maine|Cal-Maine Foods]], the largest egg producer in the U.S., are investing heavily in cage-free production. Cal-Maine has allocated $40 million to expand its cage-free operations and plans to build five new facilities to house 1 million cage-free hens by the summer of 2025.<ref>{{cite web | last=Zimmerman | first=Sarah | title=Cal-Maine plans $40M investment to expand cage-free egg production | website=Food Dive | date=2024-10-15 | url=https://www.fooddive.com/news/cal-maine-cage-free-egg-expansion/729827/ | access-date=2024-10-25}}</ref>

===European Union===
In the [[European Union]], cage-free egg production includes barns, free-range, organic (in the UK, systems must be free-range if they are to be labelled as organic) and aviary systems. Non-cage systems may be single or multi-tier (up to four levels), with or without outdoor access.  In the UK, free-range systems are the most popular of the non-cage alternatives, accounting for around 44% of all eggs in 2013, whereas barns and organic eggs together accounted for 5%.<ref>[http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/foodfarm/food/eggs/ UK egg production and price statistics] [[Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs]]</ref>

In free-range systems, hens are housed to a standard similar to that of a barn or aviary.

The [[European Union Council Directive 1999/74/EC]] stipulates that from 1 January 2007 (1 January 2012 for newly built or rebuilt systems), non-cage systems must provide the following:
* A maximum stocking density of nine hens/m<sup>2</sup> of "usable" space (units in production on or before 3 August 1999 could continue with a stocking density up to 12 hens/m<sup>2</sup> until 31 December 2011)
* If more than one level is used, a height of at least 45&nbsp;cm between the levels
* One nest for every seven hens (or 1 m<sup>2</sup> of nest space for every 120 hens if group nests are used)
* Litter (e.g. wood shavings) covering at least one-third of the floor surface, providing at least 250&nbsp;cm<sup>2</sup> of littered area per hen
* 15&nbsp;cm of perching space per hen.<ref name="ciwf.org.uk">[http://www.ciwf.org.uk/resources/publications/poultry_laying_hens/default.aspx Compassion in World Farming report - Alternatives to the barren battery cage]</ref>

In addition to these requirements, free-range systems must also provide the following:
* One [[hectare]] of outdoor range for every 2,500 hens (equivalent to 4 m<sup>2</sup> per hen; at least 2.5 m<sup>2</sup> per hen must be available at any one time if the rotation of the outdoor range is practiced)
* Continuous access during the day to this open-air range, which must be "mainly covered with vegetation"
* Several popholes extend along the entire building length, providing at least 2 m of opening for every 1,000 hens.<ref name="ciwf.org.uk"/>

Case studies of free-range systems for laying hens across the EU, carried out by [[Compassion in World Farming]], demonstrate how breed choice and preventive management practices can enable farmers to successfully use non [[Debeaking|beak-trimmed]] birds.<ref name="ciwf.org.uk"/>

===Australia===
In 2012, [[Australian Eggs]], the body for the industry, tried to register a free-range trademark allowing 20,000 hens per [[hectare]] on the range.  This sparked a major discussion between large producers, small producers, animal welfare groups, and consumer rights groups. The trademark application was withdrawn after the [[Australian Competition & Consumer Commission]] commented that the "proposed standards may mislead consumers about the nature of eggs described as 'free range'" in its Initial Assessment of the application.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Commission|first1=Australian Competition and Consumer|title=Australian Egg Corporation CTM 2012|url=https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/consultations-submissions/public-consultations/australian-egg-corporation-ctm-2012|website=[[Australian Competition & Consumer Commission]]|access-date=13 August 2017|language=en|date=21 January 2013}}</ref>

There is a voluntary code, which covers the basic standards of husbandry for physiological and behavioural needs of poultry, that allows for 1,500 layer hens per hectare.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Domestic poultry|last=Committee.|first=Primary Industries Standing|date=2002|publisher=[[CSIRO]]|isbn=9780643068674|edition=4th|location=Collingwood, Vic.|oclc=52868483}}</ref> However, the code also states that "any higher bird density is acceptable only when regular rotation of birds onto fresh range areas occurs". The voluntary code is under review and due to be consulted upon.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.smh.com.au/environment/animals/poultry-code-review-could-help-unscramble-rules-allowing-cruelty-to-chickens-20170728-gxkm2y.html|title=Poultry code review could help unscramble rules allowing cruelty to chickens|last=Burgess|first=Elise|date=5 August 2017|work=[[Sydney Morning Herald]]|access-date=2017-08-13|language=en-US}}</ref>

The Queensland government approved an increase in free-range layer hen stocking densities in July 2013. The maximum number of hens per hectare was increased from 1,500 to 10,000.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/free-range-eggs-definition-scrambled-20130728-2qshq.html |title='Free range eggs' definition scrambled |work=[[Brisbane Times]]|date=29 July 2013 |access-date=2019-02-22}}</ref>

In March 2016, Australian ministers voted in new national standards for the definition of free-range. The new standards allow for up to 10,000 birds per hectare, with no requirement for the hens to actually go outside.<ref name=":2"/> [[Choice (Australian consumer organisation)|Choice]], Australia's largest non-profit consumer organisation<ref name=":1" /> believes Australia's consumer affairs ministers made the decision to put the interests of large-scale Australian egg producers ahead of the needs of consumers.

In April 2017, the Australian Government finalised the law and decided to mandate a maximum of 10,000 hens per hectare in outdoor grazing areas, to which the hens must have "regular and meaningful" access.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/2017/04/27/this-is-what-the-governments-new-free-range-egg-guidelines-lo_a_22059101/|title=This Is What The Government's New 'Free Range' Egg Guidelines Look Like|last=Pearce|first=Lara|date=28 April 2017|work=[[HuffPost|Huffington Post]]|access-date=2017-08-13|language=en-AU}}</ref> Currently, the most popular free range accreditation schemes mandating roaming space at or below the standard set by the EU for its members, are the Free Range Farmers Association (750 hens per hectare),<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.freerangefarmers.com.au/hen-welfare.html|title=Hen Welfare|website=Free Range Farmers Association Inc.|access-date=2017-08-13}}</ref> Humane Choice (1,500 hens per hectare)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.humanechoice.com.au/certified_humane_choice_standards|title=Free Range Standards {{!}} Pork, Beef, Lamb, Chicken|website=www.humanechoice.com.au|language=en|access-date=2017-08-13}}</ref> and Australian Certified Organic (2,500 hens per hectare under pasture rotation).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://austorganic.com/certified-organic-frequently-asked-questions/|title=FAQs|website=austorganic.com|language=en-US|access-date=2017-08-13}}</ref> In July 2017, Snowdale was fined a record amount of $1.05m (including legal costs) for falsely advertising that its eggs were 'free range'.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/record-fine-for-free-range-egg-farmer-snowdale/news-story/6e399a0147b95c4ff7a2c1baf7f9aed2|title=Record fine for 'free range' egg farmer Snowdale|website=[[The Australian]]|access-date=2017-08-13}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-25/egg-producer-snowdale-holdings-fined-over-free-range-claims/8741706|title=Egg producer handed 'record' fine over false free-range labelling|date=25 July 2017|work=[[ABC News (Australia)|ABC News]]|access-date=2017-08-13|language=en-AU}}</ref> This was substantially larger than the fines imposed upon Derodi, Holland Farms, Pirovic or Darling Downs Fresh Eggs; set at either $300,000 or $250,000.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/free-range-egg-farms-ordered-to-pay-300000-penalty-for-false-or-misleading-%E2%80%9Cfree-range-egg%E2%80%9D-claims|title=Free Range Egg Farms ordered to pay $300,000 penalty for false or misleading "free range egg" claims|date=14 April 2016|work=Australian Competition & Consumer Commission|access-date=2017-08-13|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-orders-250000-penalty-against-darling-downs-fresh-eggs-for-misleading-%E2%80%98free-range%E2%80%99-claims|title=Federal Court orders $250,000, penalty against Darling Downs Fresh Eggs for misleading 'free range' claims|date=14 September 2015|work=Australian Competition & Consumer Commission|access-date=2017-08-13|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-orders-300000-penalty-after-finding-free-range-egg-claims-to-be-misleading|title=Federal Court orders $300,000 penalty after finding 'free range' egg claims to be misleading|last=Commission|first=Australian Competition and Consumer|date=23 September 2014|work=Australian Competition & Consumer Commission|access-date=2017-08-13|language=en}}</ref>

==Cost==
Based on data in the European Commission's socio-economic report published in 2004,<ref name="European Commission 2004">European Commission, 2004. Study on the socio-economic implications of the various systems to keep laying hens. Final Report for The European Commission, submitted by Agra CEAS Consulting Ltd., 2120/CC/December 2004. in [http://www.ciwf.org.uk/resources/publications/poultry_laying_hens/default.aspx Compassion in World Farming report - Alternatives to the barren battery cage]</ref> (prior to battery cages being banned in the EU) it cost €0.66 to produce 12 battery eggs, €0.82 to produce 12 barn eggs and €0.98 to produce 12 free-range eggs. This means that in 2004, one free-range egg cost 2.6 cents more to produce than a battery egg, and a barn egg cost 1.3 cents more to produce than a battery egg. The Commission's report concludes that, if costs were to increase by 20%, which it says is the type of percentage increase in terms of variable costs that producers are likely to face as a result of switching to free-range, the industry will potentially suffer a loss of producer surplus of €354 million (EU-25).<ref name="European Commission 2004"/> The margins achieved by producers for barn and free-range eggs are appreciably higher than those that were available for battery eggs. The Commission's socio-economic report shows that margins for free-range eggs were around twice as high as those for battery eggs.<ref name="European Commission 2004"/>

== Animal welfare ==
Many animal welfare advocates, including the [[Humane Society of the United States]], maintain that cage-free and free-range eggs constitute a considerable improvement for laying hens. This has led to the adoption of a cage-free eggs standard by most major food companies in the United States, although in 2017, it was estimated that cage-free eggs represented only 10% of all produced.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/confinement_farm/facts/cage-free_vs_battery-cage.html|title=Cage-Free vs. Battery-Cage Eggs: The Humane Society of the United States|website=www.humanesociety.org|language=en|access-date=2017-05-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/22/egg-makers-are-freaked-out-by-the-cage-free-future.html|title=Egg makers are freaked out by the cage-free future|last=Wong|first=Vanessa|website=CNBC|date=22 March 2017|access-date=2017-05-08}}</ref> Pundits and food commentators have described the 2016 shift toward cage-free eggs across the food industry as a "bold decision" and historic shift.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://fortune.com/mcdonalds-cage-free/|title=Inside McDonald's Bold Decision to Go Cage-Free|work=[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]|access-date=2017-05-08|language=en-US}}</ref> Several investigations, particularly by the animal rights group [[Direct Action Everywhere]], have raised doubts about to what degree cage-free farms are an improvement for laying hens.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/21/business/video-reveals-how-cage-free-hens-live-animal-advocates-say.html|title=How 'Cage-Free' Hens Live, in Animal Advocates' Video|last=Strom|first=Stephanie|date=20 October 2016|work=[[New York Times]]|access-date=2017-05-08|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://psmag.com/news/california-hens-can-now-stretch-their-wings-but-will-they-ever-fly|title=California Hens Can Now Stretch Their Wings, but Will They Ever Fly?|work=Pacific Standard|access-date=2017-05-08|language=en}}</ref> An investigation of a cage-free [[Costco]] facility in late 2016 purported to find cannibalism from the birds attacking each other, and concluded that neither caged nor cage-free facilities offered laying hens positive lives.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/theyre-being-eaten-alive-what-i-saw-in-a-cage_us_580a5aefe4b0b1bd89fdb1d0|title='They're Being Eaten Alive!' What I Saw In A Cage-Free Egg Farm|last=Hsiung|first=Wayne|date=21 October 2016|website=Huffington Post|language=en-US|access-date=2017-05-08}}</ref>

==Misconceptions==
[[File:Yolkcolor-10475164 1466594730270043 1278996929 n.jpg|thumb|Photograph of two hen egg yolks, one from a commercial egg operation and one from a free-range backyard hen. The yolk of the backyard egg is bright orange.]]
Free-range eggs may be broader in definition and have more of an orange colour to their yolks<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Van Den Brand H, Parmentier HK, Kemp B |title=Effects of housing system (outdoor v. cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics |journal=Br. Poult. Sci. |volume=45 |issue=6 |pages=745–52 |year=2004 |pmid=15697013 |doi=10.1080/00071660400014283|s2cid=26468071 }}</ref> owing to the abundance of greens and insects in the birds' diet if actually allowed substantial time outdoors to roam. These are also known as [[pasture-raised eggs]].  However, an orange yolk is not guaranteed to be from a free-range hen. Feed additives such as marigold petal meal, dried algae and alfalfa meal can be used to colour the yolks.<ref>North, M. and Bell, D. ''Commercial Chicken Production Manual'', page 678. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990</ref>

Contrary to popular belief, in the United States free-range regulations ''do not necessarily require'' that hens spend substantial time outdoors, only that the hens "have access to the outdoors".<ref name="USDA">{{cite web|publisher=USDA|url=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/food-safety-education/get-answers/food-safety-fact-sheets/poultry-preparation/turkey-raised-by-the-rules/ct_index/!ut/p/a1/jVFBbsIwEHxNjsYbQhH0FkWqgJZQhFpCLsghm8RqiC17Q5u-vi70QgUtXu3BuzMaz5inPOFpIw6yFCRVI-rvezrcwhKG_jiC2WLsP8A0fl0uHqMIRqs7B9j8AYiDG_lXTgj_8Wc3CPTNPJqXPNWCKiabQvGkRGKise9oLE8KpXJmRYHUsULsiNkKkdxCq7Ym0zFtUAtzzIQn1Jo37JgR0mLOso5Rhcy0NTrCjrayyfGDr3l6_jDwXU3jYDWYzOIAFoPfgAvJnQDXo3Hey1plx2_ahE0WjJxJgwUaNL3WuHFFpO898CCrVWl7rc1Fr1QHD_rgDzzwfddjD34skdSWWULNfBeB0lo2JSuUYZ1qDStQWPLgklalLPHkXIPr_Uvy-RROQD7v1yMbfgEAgW15/#8|title=Turkey raised by the rules|access-date=24 September 2015}}</ref> This access may be for very brief periods and the outside area may be small and sparse. Stocking densities indoors are often high, and many hens may stay inside as dominant hens often prevent the others from having access to the outside yard.<ref>[http://www.upc-online.org/freerange.html UPC report]</ref>

==Nutritional content==
Differences in age, strain, and nutrition of the hens make it exceedingly difficult to draw scientific conclusions about the effects of housing systems on the quality of the eggs. Consumer perceptions of these alternative systems delivering a better product are then scientifically unjustified in terms of there being any nutritional difference.<ref>{{cite book|editor-last1=Nys|editor-first1=Yves|editor-last2=Bain|editor-first2=Maureen|editor-last3=Immerseel|editor-first3=Filip Van|title=Impossible the safety and quality of eggs and egg products|date=2011|publisher=Woodhead|location=Cambridge|isbn=978-0857093912|pages=318–319}}</ref> A 2011 research study carried out in North Carolina compared free-range and conventional caged eggs for fatty acids, cholesterol, vitamins A and E, finding higher fat content in free-range eggs, and no significant difference in cholesterol and vitamin levels.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Anderson|first1=K. E.|title=Comparison of fatty acid, cholesterol, and vitamin A and E composition in eggs from hens housed in conventional cage and range production facilities|journal=Poultry Science|date=14 June 2011|volume=90|issue=7|pages=1600–1608|doi=10.3382/ps.2010-01289|pmid=21673178|doi-access=free}}</ref> Vitamin D in eggs have been observed to increase up to 4 times in hens that have exposure to sunlight, compared to hens that are kept away from sunlight.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Kühn|first1=Julia|last2=Schutkowski|first2=Alexandra|last3=Kluge|first3=Holger|last4=Hirche|first4=Frank|last5=Stangl|first5=Gabriele I.|title=Free-range farming: A natural alternative to produce vitamin D-enriched eggs|journal=Nutrition|date=1 April 2014|volume=30|issue=4|pages=481–484|doi=10.1016/j.nut.2013.10.002|pmid=24607306|language=en|issn=0899-9007}}</ref> Another research suggests that grass fed hens can produce eggs that are rich in (n−3) fatty acids, without adverse oxidative effects.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Lopez-Bote|first1=C.J|last2=Sanz Arias|first2=R|last3=Rey|first3=A.I|last4=Castaño|first4=A|last5=Isabel|first5=B|last6=Thos|first6=J|title=Effect of free-range feeding on n−3 fatty acid and α-tocopherol content and oxidative stability of eggs|journal=Animal Feed Science and Technology|date=May 1998|volume=72|issue=1–2|pages=33–40|doi=10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00180-6}}</ref> Some other non peer-reviewed studies have found evidence for nutritional benefit of free-range eggs.<ref>Jull, Morley A. ''Successful Poultry Raising.'' 1943</ref><ref>Karsten, Heather. "Pasture-ized Poultry." ''Penn State Online Research," May 2003. http://www.rps.psu.edu/0305/poultry.html {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060901063244/http://www.rps.psu.edu/0305/poultry.html |date=1 September 2006 }}</ref><ref>Long, C. and Newbury, U. "The Good Egg." ''Mother Earth News,'' August/September 2005. http://www.motherearthnews.com/DIY/2005-08-01/The-Good-Egg.aspx</ref><ref>Long, C. and Alterman, T. "Meet Real Free-Range Eggs" ''Mother Earth News,'' October/November 2007. http://www.motherearthnews.com/Whole-Foods-and-Cooking/2007-10-01/Tests-Reveal-Healthier-Eggs.aspx</ref>

==Retailers==
Several major retailers have a policy of selling only free-range eggs or not selling battery-cage eggs. Some retailers apply this policy to eggs in their shells and eggs used in baked goods and processed products such as ready-made meals, quiches, and ice cream.  range shell eggs, and uses only free-range eggs in their processed products and ready-made meals.<ref name="ciwf.org.uk"/>

As of 1 January 2007 (with one minor exception), all Austrian supermarkets no longer sell battery eggs. Many retailers in the Netherlands, including Albert Heijn and Schuitema (subsidiaries of [[Ahold]]), [[Laurus]] (including Edah, Konmar and Super de Boer), [[Dirk van den Broek]] (including Bas van der Heijden and Digros), [[Aldi]] and [[Lidl]] sell only free-range shell eggs; however the free-range eggs that are sold in Aldi and Lidl do not meet some country's recommendations for the production of free-range eggs. Three Belgian supermarkets: [[Makro]], [[Colruyt (supermarket)|Colruyt]] and Lidl, no longer sell battery eggs.  The Commission's report states that Sweden's move away from conventional battery cages has been aided by the decision of the four largest retailers (who, between them, account for 98–99% of the Swedish retail market) to stop stocking conventional battery eggs.<ref name="European Commission 2004"/> U.S. food suppliers [[Aramark]] and [[Unilever]] have announced they intend to buy only cage-free eggs, but as of 2013 there are not enough available to supply them.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=195639341|title=What The Rise of Cage-Free Means For Chickens|date=27 June 2013|agency=NPR|author=Dan Charles}}</ref>

In Australia, free-range eggs sold in Aldi and Lidl do not meet the [[CSIRO]]]'s Model Code recommendation of 1,500 hens per [[hectare]]. In March 2016, Australian ministers voted in new standards for the definition of free-range. The new standards allow for up to 10,000 birds per hectare, with no requirement for the hens to actually go outside.<ref name=":2">{{cite web|url=https://www.choice.com.au/food-and-drink/meat-fish-and-eggs/eggs/articles/choice-calls-for-bad-egg-boycott |title=Ministers make free-range egg labelling meaningless |work=[[Choice (Australian consumer organisation)|Choice]]|date=31 March 2016 |access-date=2019-02-22}}</ref> [[Choice (Australian consumer organisation)|Choice]], Australia's largest non-profit consumer organisation <ref name=":1">{{cite web|url=https://www.choice.com.au/about-us/the-choice-story/history |title=The CHOICE story |work=[[Choice (Australian consumer organisation)|Choice]]|access-date=2019-02-22}}</ref> believes Australia's consumer affairs ministers made the decision to put the interests of large-scale Australian egg producers ahead of the needs of consumers. A group called PROOF (standing for Pasture Raised On Open Fields) is now in the process of developing an accreditation scheme that will see the term "pastured" start appearing on cartons. The guidelines for PROOF's pastured eggs allow for a maximum stocking density of 1500 birds per hectare (in line with the CSIRO Model Code) and require that hens be able to range freely in open fields or paddocks. So far, PROOF has 12 licensed egg farms in Australia, with another eight in the pipeline.<ref name=":2"/>

== Environmental impact ==
Free range eggs carry an environmental cost.  This is mainly because in free range egg production systems, the habitat is difficult to control and the resource required to produce eggs is higher than in caged egg production.  A study done in the University of Newcastle, UK, showed a 16% increase in greenhouse gas emissions from a free range facility compared to a battery cage facility.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Leinonen|first=Ilkka|date=October 2013|title=Quantifying the environmental impacts of UK broiler and egg production systems|url=https://d-nb.info/1044488840/34|journal=Lohmann Information|volume=48|issue=2|pages=45–50|via=Deutsche National Bibliothek}}</ref>

==Rehoming charities==
[[File:Poolfield orchard.jpg|thumb|Rescue hens (red) and point-of-lay hens (dark) co-exist in a private orchard.]]
In the UK, charities such as Fresh Start for Hens<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.fsfh.org.uk/ |title=FSFH site |access-date=9 September 2016 |archive-date=7 September 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160907212130/http://www.fsfh.org.uk/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> and [[British Hen Welfare Trust]]<ref>[http://www.bhwt.org.uk BHWT site]</ref> organise rehoming for ex-factory hens that would otherwise be slaughtered.  Private smallholders pay around £6 per "rescue hen", and these birds (which may still be laying daily) then spend a "retirement" in a true free-range environment. The BHW Trust says that there is no better education than watching an ex-battery hen's confusion and bewilderment turn into wonderment at her new environment.

==See also==
* [[Organic egg production]]
* [[Free range]]
* [[Yarding]]
* [[Pastured poultry]]
* [[Factory farming]]
* [[Chickens as pets]]
* [[The Happy Egg Company]]
* {{portal-inline|Food}}

==References==
{{reflist|colwidth=30em}}

{{Poultry}}
{{Eggs}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Free-Range Eggs}}
[[Category:Animal welfare]]
[[Category:Poultry farming]]
[[Category:Eggs (food)]]