Editing Freethought

{{Distinguish|Freedom of thought|Free will}}
{{other uses|Free thought (disambiguation)}}
{{Short description|Position that beliefs should be formed only on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism}}
{{Over-quotation|date=November 2020}}
[[File:Pansy - Tombstone detail of a freethinker, late 19th century. (Cemetery of Cullera, Spain)..jpg|thumb|Tombstone detail of a freethinker, late 19th century (Cemetery of Cullera, Spain)]]
{{Irreligion sidebar|expanded=irreligion}}

'''Freethought''' (sometimes spelled '''free thought''') is an unorthodox attitude or belief.<ref name="merriam-webster2">{{cite web |title=Free thought – Definition of free thought by Merriam-Webster |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/free%20thought |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200422145549/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/free%20thought |archive-date=22 April 2020 |access-date=5 August 2020}}</ref>  

A '''freethinker''' holds that [[belief]]s should not be formed on the basis of [[authority]], [[tradition]], [[revelation]], or [[dogma]],<ref name="merriam-webster.com" /> and should instead be reached by other methods such as [[logic]], [[reason]], and [[empiricism|empirical observation]].{{Citation needed|date=June 2024}} According to the ''[[Collins English Dictionary]]'', a freethinker is "One who is mentally free from the conventional bonds of tradition or dogma, and thinks independently." In some contemporary thought in particular, free thought is strongly tied with rejection of traditional social or religious belief systems.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/freethinker|title=FREETHINKER definition in American English &#124; Collins English Dictionary}}</ref><ref name="merriam-webster.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/freethinker|title=Freethinker – Definition of freethinker by Merriam-Webster|access-date=12 June 2015|archive-date=24 April 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090424021647/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/freethinker|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iheu.org/glossary/12#letterf |title=Glossary &#124; International Humanist and Ethical Union |access-date=2012-02-03 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130117115830/http://www.iheu.org/glossary/12#letterf |archive-date=2013-01-17}}</ref> The [[cognitive]] application of free thought is known as "freethinking", and practitioners of free thought are known as "freethinkers".<ref name="merriam-webster.com"/> Modern freethinkers consider free thought to be a natural freedom from all negative and illusive thoughts acquired from society.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ffrf.org/nontracts/freethinker.php |title=Nontracts |access-date=12 June 2015 |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120804135530/http://www.ffrf.org/nontracts/freethinker.php |archive-date=4 August 2012}}</ref> 

The term first came into use in the 17th century in order to refer to people who inquired into the basis of traditional beliefs which were often accepted unquestioningly. Today, freethinking is most closely linked with [[agnosticism]], [[deism]], [[secularism]], [[humanism]], [[anti-clericalism]], and [[religious critique]].<ref>{{cite web |title=The Saga of Freethought and Its Pioneers: Religious Critique and Social Reform |url=https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/saga-freethought-pioneers-religious-critique-social-reform/ |website=American Humanist Association |access-date=22 December 2023 |date=22 December 2023}}</ref> The ''Oxford English Dictionary'' defines freethinking as, "The free exercise of reason in matters of religious belief, unrestrained by deference to authority; the adoption of the principles of a free-thinker." Freethinkers hold that knowledge should be grounded in facts, [[scientific method|scientific inquiry]], and logic. The skeptical application of science implies freedom from the intellectually limiting effects of [[confirmation bias]], [[cognitive bias]], [[conventional wisdom]], [[popular culture]], [[prejudice]], or [[sectarianism]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://freethinkers.com/who-are-the-freethinkers/|title=who are the Freethinkers?|work=Freethinkers.com|access-date=14 February 2018|date=2018-02-13|archive-date=2020-08-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801014048/https://freethinkers.com/who-are-the-freethinkers/|url-status=live}}</ref>

==Definition==
Atheist author Adam Lee defines free thought as thinking which is independent of revelation, tradition, established belief, and [[argument from authority|authority]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.patheos.com/blogs/daylightatheism/2010/02/what-is-freethought/|title=What Is Freethought?|work=Daylight Atheism|access-date=12 June 2015|date=2010-02-26|archive-date=2015-04-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402094929/http://www.patheos.com/blogs/daylightatheism/2010/02/what-is-freethought/|url-status=live}}</ref> and considers it as a "broader umbrella" than atheism "that embraces a rainbow of unorthodoxy, religious dissent, skepticism, and unconventional thinking."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://bigthink.com/daylight-atheism/9-great-freethinkers-and-religious-dissenters-in-history|title=9 Great Freethinkers and Religious Dissenters in History|author=Adam Lee|work=Big Think|access-date=12 June 2015|date=October 2012|archive-date=8 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908201016/http://bigthink.com/daylight-atheism/9-great-freethinkers-and-religious-dissenters-in-history|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |editor1-last=Bogdan |editor1-first=H. |editor2-last=Snoek |editor2-first=J. |chapter=Freemasonry and the Eighteenth-Century European Enlightenment |title=Handbook of Freemasonry |publisher=Brill |date=2014 |pages=321–335}}</ref>

The basic summarizing statement of the essay ''The Ethics of Belief'' by the 19th-century British mathematician and philosopher [[William Kingdon Clifford]] is: "It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence."<ref>{{cite book|url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gxLdO3NTiQLhUc5K1XWIa8nIM5YnXgFG/view?usp=sharing|title=Philosophy of Western Religions|chapter=5. The Ethics of Belief|last=Clifford|first=William K.|editor-last=Levin|editor-first=Noah|publisher=N.G.E. Far Press|orig-date=1st pub. 1877|pages=18–21|access-date=2022-01-31|archive-date=2022-01-31|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220131133534/https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gxLdO3NTiQLhUc5K1XWIa8nIM5YnXgFG/view?usp=sharing|url-status=live}}</ref> The essay became a rallying cry for freethinkers when published in the 1870s, and has been described as a point when freethinkers grabbed the moral high ground.<ref>{{cite book |last=Becker |first=Lawrence and Charlotte |date=2013 |title=Encyclopedia of Ethics (article on "agnosticism") |publisher=Routledge |page=44 |isbn=9781135350963 }}</ref> Clifford was himself an organizer of free thought gatherings, the driving force behind the Congress of Liberal Thinkers held in 1878.

Regarding [[religion]], freethinkers typically hold that there is insufficient evidence to support the existence of [[supernatural]] phenomena.<ref>{{cite book|last=Hastings|first=James|title=Encyclopedia of Religion|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZAwwaxdKMNAC|isbn=9780766136830|date=2003-01-01|publisher=Kessinger }}</ref> According to the [[Freedom from Religion Foundation]], "No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, [[creed]], or [[messiah]]. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth." and "Freethinkers are convinced that religious claims have not withstood the tests of reason. Not only is there nothing to be gained by believing an untruth, but there is everything to lose when we sacrifice the indispensable tool of reason on the altar of superstition. Most freethinkers consider religion to be not only untrue, but harmful."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ffrf.org/faq/feeds/item/18391-what-is-a-freethinker|title=What is a Freethinker? - Freedom From Religion Foundation|access-date=12 June 2015|archive-date=15 July 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150715021218/http://ffrf.org/faq/feeds/item/18391-what-is-a-freethinker|url-status=dead}}</ref>

[[File:Bust Of Bertrand Russell-Red Lion Square-London.jpg|thumb|upright|Bust of [[Bertrand Russell]] in London]]
However, philosopher [[Bertrand Russell]] wrote the following in his 1944 essay ''The Value of Free Thought'':<ref>{{Cite book |last=Russell |first=Bertrand |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zsC2cQAACAAJ |title=The Value of Free Thought: How to Become a Truth-seeker and Break the Chains of Mental Slavery |date=1944 |publisher=Haldeman-Julius Publications |language=en |access-date=2023-04-30 |archive-date=2023-04-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230429160059/https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/The_Value_of_Free_Thought.html?id=zsC2cQAACAAJ&redir_esc=y |url-status=live }}</ref>

{{Quote |text=What makes a freethinker is not his beliefs but the way in which he holds them. If he holds them because his elders told him they were true when he was young, or if he holds them because if he did not he would be unhappy, his thought is not free; but if he holds them because, after careful thought he finds a balance of evidence in their favour, then his thought is free, however odd his conclusions may seem. |author= |title= |source=}}

A freethinker, according to Russell, is not necessarily an atheist or an agnostic, as long as he or she satisfies this definition:

{{Quote |text=The person who is free in any respect is free ''from'' something; what is the free thinker free from? To be worthy of the name, he must be free of two things: the force of tradition, and the tyranny of his own passions. No one is ''completely'' free from either, but in the measure of a man's emancipation he deserves to be called a free thinker. |author= |title= |source=}}

[[Fred Edwords]], former executive of the [[American Humanist Association]], suggests that by Russell's definition, [[liberal religion]]ists who have challenged established orthodoxies can be considered freethinkers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://americanhumanist.org/humanism/Saga_of_Freethought_and_Its_Pioneers |title=Saga Of Freethought And Its Pioneers |work=American Humanist Association |access-date=12 June 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150715023327/http://americanhumanist.org/humanism/Saga_of_Freethought_and_Its_Pioneers |archive-date=15 July 2015}}</ref>

On the other hand, according to [[Bertrand Russell]], atheists and/or agnostics are not necessarily freethinkers. As an example, he mentions [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom he compares to a "[[pope]]":

{{Quote |text=what I am concerned with is the doctrine of the modern Communistic Party, and of the Russian Government to which it owes allegiance. According to this doctrine, the world develops on the lines of a Plan called [[Dialectical Materialism]], first discovered by [[Karl Marx]], embodied in the practice of a great state by [[Vladimir Lenin|Lenin]], and now expounded from day to day by a Church of which Stalin is the Pope. […] Free discussion is to be prevented wherever the power to do so exists; […] If this doctrine and this organization prevail, free inquiry will become as impossible as it was in the middle ages, and the world will relapse into bigotry and obscurantism. |author= |title=}}

In the 18th and 19th century, many thinkers regarded as freethinkers were [[deists]], arguing that [[Outline of Christian theology|the nature of God]] can only be known from a study of nature rather than from religious revelation. In the 18th century, "deism" was as much of a 'dirty word' as "atheism", and deists were often stigmatized as either atheists or at least as freethinkers by their Christian opponents.<ref>James E. Force, Introduction (1990) to An Account of the Growth of Deism in England (1696) by William Stephens</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04679b.htm |title=Deism |encyclopedia=The Catholic Encyclopedia |editor-first=Francis |editor-last=Aveling |year=1908 |quote=The deists were what nowadays would be called freethinkers, a name, indeed, by which they were not infrequently known; and they can only be classed together wholly in the main attitude that they adopted, viz. in agreeing to cast off the trammels of authoritative religious teaching in favour of a free and purely rationalistic speculation.... Deism, in its every manifestation was opposed to the current and traditional teaching of revealed religion. |access-date=2012-10-10 |archive-date=2012-10-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121012112353/http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04679b.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> Deists today regard themselves as freethinkers, but are now arguably less prominent in the free thought movement than atheists.

==Characteristics==
Among freethinkers, for a notion to be considered true it must be testable, [[Verifiability (science)|verifiable]], and logical. Many freethinkers tend to be [[humanism|humanists]], who base [[morality]] on human needs and would find [[meaning of life|meaning]] in human [[compassion]], [[social progress]], art, personal happiness, love, and the furtherance of [[knowledge]]. Generally, freethinkers like to think for themselves, tend to be skeptical, respect [[critical thinking]] and reason, remain open to new concepts, and are sometimes proud of their own [[individuality]]. They would determine truth for themselves – based upon knowledge they gain, answers they receive, experiences they have and the balance they thus acquire. Freethinkers reject [[conformity]] for the sake of conformity, whereby they create their own beliefs by considering the way the world around them works and would possess the intellectual integrity and courage to think outside of accepted [[Social norm|norms]], which may or may not lead them to believe in some [[deity|higher power]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/ACommonPlace.pdf|title=A COMMON PLACE by Ruth Kelly and Liam Byrne|access-date=2019-01-01|archive-date=2019-01-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190102002241/https://www.fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/ACommonPlace.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>

==Symbol==
[[File:Pansy aka.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Pansy]] is a symbol of freethought.]]

The [[pansy]] serves as the long-established and enduring symbol of free thought; literature of the [[American Secular Union]] inaugurated its usage in the late 1800s. The reasoning behind the pansy as the symbol of free thought lies both in the flower's name and in its appearance. The pansy derives its name from the [[French language|French]] word ''pensée'', which means "thought". It allegedly received this name because the flower is perceived by some to bear resemblance to a human face, and in mid-to-late summer it nods forward as if deep in thought.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ffrf.org/fttoday/1997/june_july97/gaylor.html|title=archive.ph|website=archive.ph|access-date=2023-01-02|archive-date=2012-05-23|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120523184444/http://www.ffrf.org/fttoday/1997/june_july97/gaylor.html|url-status=bot: unknown}}</ref> In the 1880s, following examples set by freethinkers in France, Belgium, Spain and Sweden, it was proposed in the United States as "the symbol of religious liberty and freedom of conscience".<ref>{{Cite web|title=Pansy of Freethought - Rediscovering A Forgotten Symbol Of Freethought|author=Annie Laurie Gaylor|url=http://www.leicestersecularsociety.org.uk/PHP_redirected/pansy.php|access-date=2023-01-02|website=www.leicestersecularsociety.org.uk|archive-date=2020-08-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801014522/http://www.leicestersecularsociety.org.uk/PHP_redirected/pansy.php|url-status=live}}</ref>

==History==

===Pre-modern movement===
Critical thought has flourished in the Hellenistic Mediterranean, in the repositories of knowledge and wisdom in [[Ireland]] and in the [[Iran]]ian civilizations (for example in the era of [[Omar Khayyám|Khayyam]] (1048–1131) and his unorthodox [[Sufism|Sufi]] [[Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam|''Rubaiyat'']] poems). Later societies made advances on [[freedom of thought]] such as the Chinese (note for example the seafaring renaissance of the [[Song dynasty|Southern Song]] dynasty of 1127–1279),<ref>{{Cite web|last=Theobald|first=Ulrich|title=Song Dynasty 宋, 960-1279|url=http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Song/song.html|access-date=2023-01-02|website=www.chinaknowledge.de|language=en|archive-date=2019-05-19|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190519204802/http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Song/song.html|url-status=live}}</ref> on through [[Heresy|heretical]] thinkers on esoteric [[alchemy]] or [[astrology]], to the [[Renaissance]] and the [[Protestant Reformation]] pioneered by [[Martin Luther]].<ref name="Gottlieb 2021 p. 4">{{cite book | last=Gottlieb | first=M. | title=The Jewish Reformation: Bible Translation and Middle-Class German Judaism As Spiritual Enterprise | publisher=Oxford University Press, Incorporated | year=2021 | isbn=978-0-19-933638-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z34fEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA4 | access-date=2023-01-19 | page=4 | archive-date=2023-01-19 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230119164428/https://books.google.com/books?id=z34fEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA4 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Nahme 2019 p. 62">{{cite book | last=Nahme | first=P.E. | title=Hermann Cohen and the Crisis of Liberalism: The Enchantment of the Public Sphere | publisher=Indiana University Press | series=New Jewish Philosophy and Thought | year=2019 | isbn=978-0-253-03977-4 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=deJVEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT62 | access-date=2023-01-19 | page=62 | archive-date=2023-01-19 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230119164429/https://books.google.com/books?id=deJVEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT62 | url-status=live }}</ref>

French physician and writer [[François Rabelais|Rabelais]] celebrated "rabelaisian" freedom as well as good feasting and drinking (an expression and a symbol of freedom of the mind) in defiance of the hypocrisies of [[conformist]] [[orthodoxy]] in his [[utopian]] [[Thelema#Fran.C3.A7ois Rabelais|Thelema]] Abbey (from θέλημα: free "will"), the device of which was ''Do What Thou Wilt'':

<blockquote>So had Gargantua established it. In all their rule and strictest tie of their order there was but this one clause to be observed, Do What Thou Wilt; because free people ... act virtuously and avoid vice. They call this honor.
</blockquote>

When Rabelais's hero [[Gargantua and Pantagruel|Pantagruel]] journeys to the "Oracle of The Div(in)e Bottle", he learns the lesson of life in one simple word: ''"Trinch!"'', Drink! Enjoy the simple life, learn wisdom and knowledge, as a free human. Beyond puns, irony, and satire, Gargantua's prologue-[[metaphor]] instructs the reader to "break the bone and suck out the substance-full marrow" ("''la substantifique moëlle''"), the core of wisdom.

===Modern movements===
The year 1600 is considered a landmark in the era of modern free thought. It was the year of the execution in Italy of [[Giordano Bruno]], a former [[Dominican Order|Dominican]] friar, by the [[Inquisition]].<ref name=gatti18>{{cite book|last=Gatti|first=Hilary|title=Giordano Bruno and Renaissance Science: Broken Lives and Organizational Power|date=2002|publisher=Cornell University Press|location=Ithaca, New York|pages=18–19|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9cYumhwTQP8C|access-date=21 March 2014|quote=For Bruno was claiming for the philosopher a principle of free thought and inquiry which implied an entirely new concept of authority: that of the individual intellect in its serious and continuing pursuit of an autonomous inquiry… It is impossible to understand the issue involved and to evaluate justly the stand made by Bruno with his life without appreciating the question of free thought and liberty of expression. His insistence on placing this issue at the center of both his work and of his defense is why Bruno remains so much a figure of the modern world. If there is, as many have argued, an intrinsic link between science and liberty of inquiry, then Bruno was among those who guaranteed the future of the newly emerging sciences, as well as claiming in wider terms a general principle of free thought and expression.|isbn=978-0801487859}}</ref><ref name=montano1>{{cite book|last=Montano|first=Aniello|title=Le deposizioni davanti al tribunale dell'Inquisizione|date=24 November 2007|publisher=La Città del Sole|location=Napoli|page=71|editor=Antonio Gargano|quote=In Rome, Bruno was imprisoned for seven years and subjected to a difficult trial that analyzed, minutely, all his philosophical ideas. Bruno, who in Venice had been willing to recant some theses, become increasingly resolute and declared on 21 December 1599 that he 'did not wish to repent of having too little to repent, and in fact did not know what to repent.' Declared an unrepentant heretic and excommunicated, he was burned alive in the Campo dei Fiori in Rome on 17 February 1600. On the stake, along with Bruno, burned the hopes of many, including philosophers and scientists of good faith like Galileo, who thought they could reconcile religious faith and scientific research, while belonging to an ecclesiastical organization declaring itself to be the custodian of absolute truth and maintaining a cultural militancy requiring continual commitment and suspicion.}}</ref><ref name=birx>{{cite news|last=Birx|first=James|title=Giordano Bruno|url=http://www.theharbinger.org/xvi/971111/birx.html|access-date=28 April 2014|newspaper=Mobile Alabama Harbinger|date=11 November 1997|quote=To me, Bruno is the supreme martyr for both free thought and critical inquiry… Bruno's critical writings, which pointed out the hypocrisy and bigotry within the Church, along with his tempestuous personality and undisciplined behavior, easily made him a victim of the religious and philosophical intolerance of the 16th century. Bruno was excommunicated by the Catholic, Lutheran and Calvinist Churches for his heretical beliefs. The Catholic hierarchy found him guilty of infidelity and many errors, as well as serious crimes of heresy… Bruno was burned to death at the stake for his pantheistic stance and cosmic perspective.|archive-date=16 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190516084317/http://www.theharbinger.org/xvi/971111/birx.html|url-status=dead}}</ref>

====Australia====
Prior to [[World War II]], Australia had high rates of Protestantism and Catholicism. Post-war Australia has become a highly [[Secularization|secular]]ised country. [[Donald Horne]], one of Australia's well-known [[public intellectuals]], believed rising prosperity in post-war Australia influenced the decline in church-going and general lack of interest in religion. "Churches no longer matter very much to most Australians. If there is a happy eternal life it's for everyone ... For many Australians the pleasures of this life are sufficiently satisfying that religion offers nothing of great appeal", said Horne in his landmark work ''[[The Lucky Country]]'' (1964).<ref name=horne>Buttrose, Larry. [https://archive.today/20121216012210/http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,26024094-7583,00.html Sport, grog and godliness], ''[[The Australian]]''. Retrieved on 11 September 2009.</ref>

====Belgium====
{{Main|Organized secularism}}

The [[Université Libre de Bruxelles]] and the [[Vrije Universiteit Brussel]], along with the two Circles of Free Inquiry (Dutch and French speaking), defend the freedom of critical thought, [[Laity|lay]] philosophy and [[ethics]], while rejecting the [[Appeal to authority|argument of authority]].

====Canada====
In 1873, a handful of secularists founded the earliest known secular organization in [[English Canada]], the Toronto Freethought Association. Reorganized in 1877 and again in 1881, when it was renamed the Toronto Secular Society, the group formed the nucleus of the Canadian Secular Union, established in 1884 to bring together freethinkers from across the country.<ref>[[Ramsay Cook]], ''The Regenerators: Social Criticism in Late Victorian English Canada'' (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985), pp. 46–64.</ref>

A significant number of the early members appear to have come from the educated labour "aristocracy", including Alfred F. Jury, J. Ick Evans and J. I. Livingstone, all of whom were leading labour activists and secularists. The second president of the Toronto association, [[T. Phillips Thompson]], became a central figure in the city's labour and social-reform movements during the 1880s and 1890s and arguably Canada's foremost late nineteenth-century labour intellectual. By the early 1880s scattered free thought organizations operated throughout southern [[Ontario]] and parts of [[Quebec]], eliciting both urban and rural support.

The principal organ of the free thought movement in Canada was ''[[Secular Thought]]'' (Toronto, 1887–1911). Founded and edited during its first several years by English freethinker [[Charles Watts (secularist)|Charles Watts]] (1835–1906), it came under the editorship of Toronto printer and publisher James Spencer Ellis in 1891 when Watts returned to England. In 1968 the [[Humanist Association of Canada]] (HAC) formed to serve as an umbrella group for humanists, atheists, and freethinkers, and to champion social justice issues and oppose religious influence on public policy—most notably in the fight to make access to abortion free and legal in Canada.

====France====

[[File:Hommage aux morts de la Libre-pensée (1er et 2 novembre 1881), 2017.0.304.1.jpg|thumb|''Hommage aux morts de la Libre-pensée'', 1881]]
In France, the concept first appeared in publication in 1765 when [[Denis Diderot]], [[Jean le Rond d'Alembert]], and [[Voltaire]] included an article on ''Liberté de penser'' in their [[Encyclopédie]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://artflsrv02.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.8:1431:4.encyclopedie0513.4781541|title=ARTFL Encyclopédie Search Results|volume=9|pages=472|access-date=12 June 2015|date=1751–1772|archive-date=22 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190322135708/http://artflsrv02.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.8:1431:4.encyclopedie0513.4781541|url-status=dead}}</ref> The concept of free thought spread so widely that even places as remote as the [[Jotunheimen]], in [[Norway]], had well-known freethinkers such as [[Jo Gjende]] by the 19th century.<ref name="MEMIM">{{cite web|title=Gjendesheim|url=http://memim.com/gjendesheim.html|website=MEMIM|access-date=8 August 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160808194917/http://memim.com/gjendesheim.html|archive-date=8 August 2016|date=2016}}</ref>

[[François-Jean de la Barre|François-Jean Lefebvre de la Barre]] (1745–1766) was a young [[France|French]] nobleman, famous for having been [[torture]]d and [[Decapitated|beheaded]] before his body was burnt on a [[pyre]] along with Voltaire's ''[[Philosophical Dictionary]]''. La Barre is often said to have been executed for not saluting a [[Roman Catholic]] religious procession, but the elements of the case were far more complex.<ref name="Gregory2008">{{cite book|last1=Gregory|first1=Mary Efrosini|title=Evolutionism in Eighteenth-century French Thought|date=2008|publisher=Peter Lang|isbn=9781433103735|page=192}}</ref>

In France, Lefebvre de la Barre is widely regarded a symbol of the victims of Christian [[religious intolerance]]; La Barre along with [[Jean Calas]] and [[Pierre-Paul Sirven]], was championed by Voltaire. A second replacement statue to de la Barre stands nearby the [[Sacré-Cœur, Paris|Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus of Paris]] at the summit of the butte [[Montmartre]] (itself named from the ''Temple of Mars''), the highest point in [[Paris]] and an [[18th arrondissement of Paris|18th arrondissement]] street nearby the [[Sacré-Cœur, Paris|Sacré-Cœur]] is also named after Lefebvre de la Barre.

The 19th century saw the emergence of a specific notion of ''Libre-Pensée'' ("free thought"), with writer [[Victor Hugo]] as one of its major early proponents. French Freethinkers (''Libre-Penseurs'') associate freedom of thought, political [[anti-clericalism]] and socialist leanings. The main organisation referring to this tradition to this day is the [[Fédération nationale de la libre pensée]], created in 1890.

====Germany====
[[File:Otto Martin junge Dame im schwarzen Kleid mit Blumen.jpg|thumb|upright|''[[Jugendweihe]]'' is a German coming of age ceremony. Photograph from early 20th century.]]

In Germany, during the period 1815–1848 and before the [[Revolutions of 1848 in the German states|March Revolution]], the resistance of citizens against the dogma of the church increased. In 1844, under the influence of [[Johannes Ronge]] and [[Robert Blum]], belief in the rights of man, tolerance among men, and [[humanism]] grew, and by 1859 they had established the ''Bund Freireligiöser Gemeinden Deutschlands'' (literally ''Union of Free Religious Communities of Germany''), an association of persons who consider themselves to be religious without adhering to any established and institutionalized church or sacerdotal cult. This union still exists today, and is included as a member in the umbrella organization of free humanists. In 1881 in [[Frankfurt am Main]], [[Ludwig Büchner]] established the ''Deutscher Freidenkerbund'' ([[German Freethinkers League]]) as the first German organization for [[Atheism|atheists]] and agnostics. In 1892 the ''Freidenker-Gesellschaft'' and in 1906 the ''Deutscher Monistenbund'' were formed.<ref name="may">{{cite book |last= Bock| first= Heike | chapter= Secularization of the modern conduct of life? Reflections on the religiousness of early modern Europe| editor=Hanne May |title=Religiosität in der säkularisierten Welt |publisher=VS Verlag fnr Sozialw |year=2006 |pages= 157|isbn=978-3-8100-4039-8 }}</ref>

Free thought organizations developed the "[[Jugendweihe]]" (literally ''Youth consecration''), a secular "[[confirmation]]" ceremony, and atheist funeral rites.<ref name="may"/><ref name="isbn0-472-06938-1">{{cite book |author=Reese, Dagmar |title=Growing up female in Nazi Germany |publisher=University of Michigan Press |location=Ann Arbor, Mich |year=2006 |page=160 |isbn=978-0-472-06938-5 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=5qA4My-C2nkC&pg=PA160 }}</ref> The Union of Freethinkers for Cremation was founded in 1905, and the Central Union of German Proletariat Freethinker in 1908. The two groups merged in 1927, becoming the German Freethinking Association in 1930.<ref name="Reinhalter">{{cite book |last= Reinhalter|first=Helmut|editor=Bromiley, Geoffrey William |editor2=Fahlbusch, Erwin |chapter= Freethinkers|title=The encyclopedia of Christianity |publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans |location=Grand Rapids, MI |year=1999 |isbn=978-90-04-11695-5 }}</ref>

More "bourgeois" organizations declined after [[World War I]], and "proletarian" free thought groups proliferated, becoming an organization of socialist parties.<ref name="may"/><ref name=kaiser/> European socialist free thought groups formed the International of Proletarian Freethinkers (IPF) in 1925.<ref name="peris"/> Activists agitated for Germans to disaffiliate from their respective Church and for secularization of elementary schools; between 1919–1921 and 1930–1932 more than 2.5 million Germans, for the most part supporters of the Social Democratic and Communist parties, gave up church membership.<ref name="lamberti">{{cite book |author=Lamberti, Marjorie |title=Politics Of Education: Teachers and School Reform in Weimar Germany (Monographs in German History) |publisher=Berghahn Books |location=Providence |year=2004 |page= 185|isbn=978-1-57181-299-5 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=jbmwM4wsMKEC&pg=PA185}}</ref> Conflict developed between radical forces including the Soviet [[League of the Militant Godless]] and Social Democratic forces in Western Europe led by Theodor Hartwig and [[Max Sievers]].<ref name="peris">{{cite book |author=Peris, Daniel |title=Storming the heavens: the Soviet League of the Militant Godless |publisher=Cornell University Press |location=Ithaca, N.Y |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-8014-3485-3 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/stormingheavenss00peri_0/page/110 110]–11 |url=https://archive.org/details/stormingheavenss00peri_0|url-access=registration }}</ref> In 1930 the Soviet and allied delegations, following a walk-out, took over the IPF and excluded the former leaders.<ref name="peris"/>
Following Hitler's rise to power in 1933, most free thought organizations were banned, though some right-wing groups that worked with so-called ''[[Völkisch]]e Bünde'' (literally ''"ethnic" associations'' with nationalist, xenophobic and very often racist ideology) were tolerated by the Nazis until the mid-1930s.<ref name="may"/><ref name=kaiser>{{cite book|last=Kaiser|first=Jochen-Christoph|title=Atheismus und religiöse Indifferenz|editor=Christel Gärtner|publisher=VS Verlag|year=2003|volume=Organisierter Atheismus|isbn=978-3-8100-3639-1|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YXOr4xQFSJsC&pg=PA124}}</ref>

====Ireland====
In the 19th century, received opinion was scandalized by [[George Ensor]] (1769–1843).<ref name=":6">{{Cite book |last1=Strachan |first1=John |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aMbaDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT144 |title=British Satire, 1785-1840, Volume 1 |last2=Jones |first2=Steven E. |date=2020-04-01 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-000-71299-5 |pages=144 |language=en |access-date=2023-04-30 |archive-date=2023-04-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230415080208/https://books.google.com/books?id=aMbaDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT144 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite book |last=Duddy |first=Thomas |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2TJBtm__n3sC |title=A History of Irish Thought |date=2012 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-62352-5 |pages=118–119 |language=en |access-date=2023-04-30 |archive-date=2023-04-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230427222539/https://books.google.com/books?id=2TJBtm__n3sC |url-status=live }}</ref> His ''Review of the Miracles, Prophecies, & Mysteries of the Old and New Testaments'' (1835) argued that, far from being a source of moral teaching, revealed religion and its divines regarded questions of morality as "incidental"--as a "mundane and merely philosophical" topic.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ensor |first=George |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=E-5iAAAAcAAJ |title=A Review of the Miracles, prophecies, and mysteries of the Old and New Testaments, and of the morality and consolation of the Christian Religion |date=1835 |publisher=John Brooks |location=London |pages=88, 91, 103 |language=en |access-date=2023-04-30 |archive-date=2023-04-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411123327/https://books.google.com/books?id=E-5iAAAAcAAJ |url-status=live }}</ref>

====Netherlands====
[[File:De_Vrijdenker_3_nummers_1200px_P5090207.jpg|thumb|The Dutch magazine ''De Vrijdenker'' (The Freethinker) 2015]]

In the Netherlands, free thought has existed in organized form since the establishment of De Dageraad (now known as [[De Vrije Gedachte]]) in 1856. Among its most notable subscribing 19th century individuals were [[Johannes van Vloten]], [[Multatuli]], Adriaan Gerhard and [[Domela Nieuwenhuis]].

In 2009, Frans van Dongen established the Atheist-Secular Party, which takes a considerably restrictive view of religion and public religious expressions.

Since the 19th century, free thought in the Netherlands has become more well known as a political phenomenon through at least three currents: liberal freethinking, conservative freethinking, and classical freethinking. In other words, parties which identify as freethinking tend to favor non-doctrinal, rational approaches to their preferred ideologies, and arose as secular alternatives to both clerically aligned parties as well as labor-aligned parties. Common themes among freethinking political parties are "freedom", "liberty", and "[[individualism]]".

====Switzerland====
{{Main|Freethinkers Association of Switzerland}}

With the introduction of cantonal [[church tax]]es in the 1870s, [[anti-clericalism|anti-clericals]] began to organise themselves. Around 1870, a "freethinkers club" was founded in [[Zürich]]. During the debate on the Zürich church law in 1883, professor Friedrich Salomon Vögelin and city council member Kunz proposed to [[separation of church and state|separate church and state]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.frei-denken.ch/de/2008/04/geschichte-der-freidenker/ |title=Geschichte der Freidenker |work=FAS website |access-date=10 May 2016 |language=de |archive-date=2 November 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171102120645/http://www.frei-denken.ch/de/2008/04/geschichte-der-freidenker/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

====Turkey====

[[File:Ateizm Derneği logo.png|thumb|upright=0.6|Logo of [[Ateizm Derneği|Atheism Association]] of Turkey]]
In the last years of the [[Ottoman Empire]], free thought made its voice heard by the works of distinguished people such as [[Ahmet Rıza]], [[Tevfik Fikret]], [[Abdullah Cevdet]], Kılıçzade Hakkı, and [[:tr:Celal Nuri İleri|Celal Nuri İleri]]. These intellectuals affected the [[One-party period of the Republic of Turkey|early period]] of the [[Turkey|Turkish Republic]]. [[Mustafa Kemal Atatürk]] –[[Mareşal (Turkey)|field marshal]], revolutionary statesman, author, and [[Father of the Nation|founder]] of the [[Secular state|secular]] Turkish [[nation state]], serving as its first [[President of Turkey|President]] from 1923 until his death in 1938– was the practitioner of their ideas. He made many [[Atatürk's Reforms|reforms]] that modernized the country. Sources point out that Atatürk was a [[religious skepticism|religious skeptic]] and a freethinker. He was a non-doctrinaire [[Deism|deist]]<ref>Reşat Kasaba, "Atatürk", ''The Cambridge history of Turkey: Volume 4: Turkey in the Modern World'', Cambridge University Press, 2008; {{ISBN|978-0-521-62096-3}} [{{Google books|plainurl=yes |id=iOoGH4GckQgC|page=163}} p. 163]; accessed 27 March 2015.</ref><ref>[{{Google books|plainurl=yes|id=kdXGAAAAQBAJ|page=84}} ''Political Islam in Turkey'' by Gareth Jenkins, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, p. 84]; {{ISBN|0230612458}}</ref> or an [[Atheism|atheist]],<ref>[{{Google books|plainurl=yes|id=DUal7eYmEnEC|page=106}} ''Atheism''], Brief Insights Series by Julian Baggini, Sterling Publishing Company, Inc., 2009; {{ISBN|1402768826}}, p. 106.</ref><ref>[{{Google books|plainurl=yes|id=2gAjMuLivlQC|page=19}} Islamism: A Documentary and Reference Guide], John Calvert John, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2008; {{ISBN|0313338566}}, p. 19.</ref><ref>...Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, founder of the secular Turkish Republic. He said: ''"I have no religion, and at times I wish all religions at the bottom of the sea..."'' [{{Google books|plainurl=yes|id=oXxXxBXewzgC|page=146}} The Antipodean Philosopher: Interviews on Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand], Graham Oppy, Lexington Books, 2011, {{ISBN|0739167936}}, p. 146.</ref> who was antireligious and anti-Islamic in general.<ref>Phil Zuckerman, John R. Shook, The Oxford Handbook of Secularism, Oxford University Press, 2017, {{ISBN|0199988455}}, p. 167.</ref><ref>Tariq Ramadan, Islam and the Arab Awakening, Oxford University Press, 2012, {{ISBN|0199933731}}, p. 76.</ref> According to Atatürk, the Turkish people do not know what Islam really is and do not read the [[Quran]]. People are influenced by Arabic sentences that they do not understand, and because of their customs they go to mosques. When the Turks read the Quran and think about it, they will leave Islam.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-07-22|title=Atatürk İslam için ne düşünüyordu? - Türkiye Haberleri - Radikal|url=http://www.radikal.com.tr/turkiye/ataturk-islam-icin-ne-dusunuyordu-791000/|access-date=2023-01-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170722130231/http://www.radikal.com.tr/turkiye/ataturk-islam-icin-ne-dusunuyordu-791000/ |archive-date=2017-07-22 }}</ref> Atatürk described Islam as the religion of the [[Arabs]] in his own work titled ''Vatandaş için Medeni Bilgiler'' by his own [[Criticism of Islam|critical]] and [[Turkish nationalism|nationalist]] views.<ref>{{Cquote|Even before accepting the religion of the Arabs, the Turks were a great nation. After accepting the religion of the Arabs, this religion, didn't effect to combine the Arabs, the Persians and Egyptians with the Turks to constitute a nation. (This religion) rather, loosened the national nexus of Turkish nation, got national excitement numb. This was very natural. Because the purpose of the religion founded by Muhammad, over all nations, was to drag to an including Arab national politics. ''(Afet İnan, Medenî Bilgiler ve M. Kemal Atatürk'ün El Yazıları, Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1998, p. 364.<!-- ISBN needed -->)''}}</ref>

[[Ateizm Derneği|Association of Atheism]] (''Ateizm Derneği''), the first official atheist organisation in Middle East and Caucasus, was founded in 2014.<ref name="turkishatheist.net1">{{cite web|title=The first Atheist Association in Turkey is founded|url=http://turkishatheist.net/?p=40|website=turkishatheist.net| date=3 May 2014 |access-date=2 April 2017|archive-date=3 March 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180303175925/http://turkishatheist.net/?p=40|url-status=live}}</ref> It serves to support irreligious people and freethinkers in Turkey who are discriminated against based on their views. In 2018 it was reported in some media outlets that the Ateizm Derneği would close down because of the pressure on its members and attacks by pro-government media, but the association itself issued a clarification that this was not the case and that it was still active.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://ahvalnews.com/turkey-atheism/turkeys-atheism-association-threatened-hostility-and-lack-interest|title=Turkey's Atheism Association threatened by hostility and lack of interest {{!}} Ahval|work=Ahval|access-date=2018-10-21|language=en|archive-date=2020-08-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801021302/https://ahvalnews.com/turkey-atheism/turkeys-atheism-association-threatened-hostility-and-lack-interest|url-status=dead}}</ref>

====United Kingdom====
The term ''freethinker'' emerged towards the end of the 17th century in England to describe those who stood in opposition to the institution of the [[Church of England|Church]], and the literal belief in the [[Bible]]. The beliefs of these individuals were centered on the concept that people could understand the world through consideration of nature. Such positions were formally documented for the first time in 1697 by [[William Molyneux]] in a widely publicized letter to [[John Locke]], and more extensively in 1713, when [[Anthony Collins (philosopher)|Anthony Collins]] wrote his ''Discourse of Free-thinking,'' which gained substantial popularity. This essay attacks the clergy of all churches and it is a plea for [[deism]].

''[[The Freethinker (journal)|The Freethinker]]'' magazine was first published in Britain in 1881; it continued in print until 2014, and still exists as a web-based publication. 

====United States====
[[File:TSJan29 1921.jpg|thumb|upright|Cover of ''[[The Truth Seeker]]'' from 1921 with picture of [[Thomas Paine]] and symbols of the Enlightenment]]

The freethought movement first organized itself in the United States as the "Free Press Association" in 1827 in defense of George Houston, publisher of ''The Correspondent'', an early journal of [[Biblical criticism]] in an era when blasphemy convictions were still possible. Houston had helped found an [[Owenite]] community at Haverstraw, New York in 1826–27. The short-lived ''Correspondent'' was superseded by the ''Free Enquirer'', the official organ of [[Robert Owen]]'s [[New Harmony, Indiana|New Harmony]] community in Indiana, edited by [[Robert Dale Owen]] and by [[Fanny Wright]] between 1828 and 1832 in New York. During this time Robert Dale Owen sought to introduce the philosophic skepticism of the Free Thought movement into the [[Working Men's Party (New York)|Workingmen's Party]] in New York City. The ''Free Enquirer'''s annual civic celebrations of Paine's birthday after 1825 finally coalesced in 1836 in the first national freethinkers organization, the "United States Moral and Philosophical Society for the General Diffusion of Useful Knowledge". It was founded on August 1, 1836, at a national convention at the Lyceum in Saratoga Springs with Isaac S. Smith of [[Buffalo, New York|Buffalo]], New York, as president. Smith was also the 1836 [[Locofocos|Equal Rights Party]]'s candidate for Governor of New York and had also been the Workingmen's Party candidate for Lt. Governor of New York in 1830. The Moral and Philosophical Society published ''The Beacon'', edited by Gilbert Vale.<ref>{{cite book|last= Hugins|first= Walter|title= Jacksonian Democracy and the Working Class: A Study of the New York Workingmen's Movement 1829–1837|year= 1960|publisher= Stanford University Press|location= Stanford|pages= 36–48}}</ref>

[[File:Dresden Edition overall.JPG|thumb|Collected works of [[Robert G. Ingersoll]]<ref>{{cite journal|last=Brandt|first=Eric T., and Timothy Larsen|title=The Old Atheism Revisited: Robert G. Ingersoll and the Bible|journal=Journal of the Historical Society|volume=11|issue=2|year=2011|pages=211–38|doi=10.1111/j.1540-5923.2011.00330.x}}</ref>]]
Driven by the revolutions of 1848 in the German states, the 19th century saw an [[immigration]] of [[German people|German]] freethinkers and anti-clericalists to the United States (see [[Forty-Eighters]]). In the United States, they hoped to be able to live by their principles, without interference from government and church authorities.<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin">{{cite web|title=Freethinkers in Wisconsin|publisher=Dictionary of Wisconsin History|year=2008|url=http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/dictionary/index.asp?action=view&term_id=11488&term_type_id=1&term_type_text=People&letter=F|access-date=2008-07-27|archive-date=2009-07-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090704023630/http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/dictionary/index.asp?action=view&term_id=11488&term_type_id=1&term_type_text=People&letter=F|url-status=dead}}</ref>

[[File:Heston, Two Ways to Go, 1896.gif|thumb|[[Watson Heston]], ''Two Ways to Go'', 1896]]
Many Freethinkers settled in German immigrant strongholds, including [[St. Louis]], [[Indianapolis]], [[Wisconsin]], and [[Texas]], where they founded the town of [[Comfort, Texas|Comfort]], Texas, as well as others.<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/>

These groups of German Freethinkers referred to their organizations as ''Freie Gemeinden'', or "free congregations".<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/> The first Freie Gemeinde was established in St. Louis in 1850.<ref name="American Irreligion 1966">Demerath, N. J. III and Victor Thiessen, "On Spitting Against the Wind: Organizational Precariousness and American Irreligion," ''The American Journal of Sociology'', 71: 6 (May, 1966), 674–87.</ref> Others followed in Pennsylvania, California, Washington, D.C., New York, Illinois, Wisconsin, Texas, and other states.<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/><ref name="American Irreligion 1966"/>

Freethinkers tended to be liberal, espousing ideals such as racial, social, and sexual equality, and the abolition of slavery.<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/>

The "[[Golden Age of Freethought]]" in the US came in the late 1800s. The dominant organization was the [[National Liberal League (United States)|National Liberal League]] which formed in 1876 in Philadelphia. This group re-formed itself in 1885 as the American Secular Union under the leadership of the eminent agnostic orator [[Robert G. Ingersoll]]. Following Ingersoll's death in 1899 the organization declined, in part due to lack of effective [[leadership]].<ref name=ftt>{{cite web|title= National Liberal League|url= http://www.freethought-trail.org/profile.php?By=Person&Page=30|work= The Freethought Trail|publisher= freethought-trail.org|access-date= 9 March 2014|archive-date= 9 March 2014|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140309180155/http://www.freethought-trail.org/profile.php?By=Person&Page=30|url-status= live}}</ref>

Freethought in the United States declined in the early twentieth century. By the early twentieth century, most freethought congregations had disbanded or joined other mainstream churches. The longest continuously operating freethought congregation in America is the Free Congregation of Sauk County, Wisconsin, which was founded in 1852 and is still active {{as of|2020|lc=on||df=}}. It affiliated with the [[American Unitarian Association]] (now the [[Unitarian Universalist Association]]) in 1955.<ref name="Sauk County Freethinkers">{{cite web | title = History of the Free Congregation of Sauk County: The "Freethinkers" Story | publisher = Free Congregation of Sauk County | date = April 2009 | url = http://www.freecongregation.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=59 | access-date = 2012-02-05 | url-status=dead | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120326214734/http://www.freecongregation.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=59 | archive-date = 2012-03-26 }}</ref> [[D. M. Bennett]] was the founder and publisher of ''[[Truth Seeker|The Truth Seeker]]'' in 1873, a radical free thought and reform American periodical.

German freethinker settlements were located in:
{{div col|colwidth=50%}}
* [[Burlington, Wisconsin|Burlington]], [[Racine County, Wisconsin|Racine County]], [[Wisconsin]]<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/>
* [[Belleville, Illinois|Belleville]], [[St. Clair County, Illinois|St. Clair County]], [[Illinois]]
* [[Castell, Texas|Castell]], [[Llano County, Texas|Llano County]], [[Texas]]
* [[Comfort, Texas|Comfort]], [[Kendall County, Texas|Kendall County]], Texas
* [[Davenport, Iowa|Davenport]], [[Scott County, Iowa|Scott County]], [[Iowa]]<ref name=Anderson>{{cite book|author1=William Roba|author2=Fredrick I. Anderson (ed.)|title=Joined by a River: Quad Cities|year=1982|publisher=Lee Enterprises|location=Davenport|page=73}}</ref>
* [[Fond du Lac, Wisconsin|Fond du Lac]], [[Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin|Fond du Lac County]], Wisconsin<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/>
* [[Frelsburg, Texas|Frelsburg]], [[Colorado County, Texas|Colorado County]], Texas
* [[Hermann, Missouri|Hermann]], [[Gasconade County, Missouri|Gasconade County]], [[Missouri]]
* [[Jefferson, Jefferson County, Wisconsin|Jefferson]], [[Jefferson County, Wisconsin|Jefferson County]], Wisconsin<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/>
* [[Indianapolis]], [[Indiana]]<ref>{{cite web|url= http://ffrf.org/fttoday/2002/junejuly02/gascho.php|title= The Turners, Forty-eighters and Freethinkers|access-date= 2008-07-27|publisher= Freedom from Religion Foundation|date= July 2002|url-status=dead|archive-url= https://archive.today/20120712230800/http://ffrf.org/fttoday/2002/junejuly02/gascho.php|archive-date= 2012-07-12}}</ref>
* [[Latium, Texas|Latium]], [[Washington County, Texas|Washington County]], Texas
* [[Manitowoc, Wisconsin|Manitowoc]], [[Manitowoc County, Wisconsin|Manitowoc County]], Wisconsin<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/>
* [[Meyersville, Texas|Meyersville]], [[DeWitt County, Texas|DeWitt County]], Texas
* [[Milwaukee]], Wisconsin<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/>
* Millheim, [[Austin County, Texas|Austin County]], Texas
* [[Oshkosh, Wisconsin|Oshkosh]], [[Winnebago County, Wisconsin]]<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/>
* Ratcliffe, [[DeWitt County, Texas|DeWitt County]], Texas
* [[Sauk City, Wisconsin|Sauk City]], [[Sauk County, Wisconsin|Sauk County]], Wisconsin<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/><ref name="Sauk County Freethinkers"/>
* [[Shelby, Texas|Shelby]], Austin County, Texas
* [[Sisterdale, Texas|Sisterdale]], [[Kendall County, Texas|Kendall County]], Texas
* [[St. Louis, Missouri|St. Louis]], Missouri
* [[Tusculum, Texas|Tusculum]], Kendall County, Texas
* [[Two Rivers (town), Wisconsin|Two Rivers]], Manitowoc County, Wisconsin<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/>
* [[Watertown, Wisconsin|Watertown]], [[Dodge County, Wisconsin|Dodge County]], Wisconsin<ref name="Freethinkers in Wisconsin"/>
{{div col end}}

====Anarchism====
{{Anarchism sidebar|Theory}}

=====United States tradition=====
Freethought influenced the development of [[anarchism in the United States]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Koenig|first=Brigitte Anne|title=American Anarchism: The Politics of Gender, Culture, and Community from Haymarket to the First World War|year=2000|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=45pNAQAAMAAJ|volume=2|publisher=University of California, Berkeley|publication-date=2000|page=315|isbn=|access-date=11 April 2021|quote=[...] parts of the anarchist movement in the United States actually stemmed from free thought circles [...].}}</ref> In the U.S.,{{when?|date=April 2021}} <blockquote>"free thought was a basically [[Anti-Christianity|anti-Christian]], [[anti-clerical]] movement, whose purpose was to make the individual politically and spiritually free to decide for himself on religious matters. A number of contributors to ''[[Liberty (1881–1908)|Liberty]]'' were prominent figures in both free thought and anarchism. The [[Individualist anarchism in the United States|American individualist anarchist]] George MacDonald [(1857–1944)] was a co-editor of ''Freethought'' and, for a time, ''The Truth Seeker.'' E. C. Walker was co-editor of the freethought/free love journal ''[[Lucifer, the Light-Bearer]]''."<ref name="mises.org">{{cite web |url= https://mises.org/journals/jls/5_3/5_3_4.pdf |title= The Journal of Libertarian Studies |work= Mises Institute |access-date= 12 June 2015 |date= 2014-07-30 |archive-date= 2013-09-11 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130911065010/http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/5_3/5_3_4.pdf |url-status= live }}</ref></blockquote> "Many of the anarchists were ardent freethinkers; reprints from free thought papers such as ''[[Lucifer, the Light-Bearer]]'', ''Freethought'' and ''The Truth Seeker'' appeared in ''Liberty''...The church was viewed as a common ally of the state and as a repressive force in and of itself."<ref name="mises.org"/>

=====European tradition=====
[[File:Escuela Moderna.jpg|thumb|upright|The ''Boletín de la Escuela Moderna'', 1905, edited by Francisco Ferrer]]

In Europe, a similar development occurred in French and Spanish individualist anarchist circles: <blockquote> "Anticlericalism, just as in the rest of the [[libertarian]] movement, in another of the frequent elements which will gain relevance related to the measure in which the (French) Republic begins to have conflicts with the church...Anti-clerical discourse, frequently called for by the French individualist [[André Lorulot]] [(1885–1963)], will have its impacts in ''Estudios'' (a Spanish [[Individualist anarchism in Europe|individualist anarchist]] publication). There will be an attack on institutionalized religion for the responsibility that it had in the past on negative developments, for its irrationality which makes it a counterpoint of philosophical and scientific progress. There will be a criticism of [[proselytism]] and ideological manipulation which happens on both believers and agnostics".<ref>{{cite web|year=2007|title=El anarquismo individualista en España (1923–1939)|author=Xavier Diez|url=http://www.viruseditorial.net/pdf/anarquismo%2520individualista.pdf|access-date=2023-01-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120324044614/http://www.viruseditorial.net/pdf/anarquismo%2520individualista.pdf|archive-date=2012-03-24|page=143}}</ref></blockquote> These tendencies would continue in French individualist anarchism in the work and activism of [[Charles-Auguste Bontemps]] (1893–1981) and others. In the Spanish individualist anarchist magazines ''Ética'' and ''[[Iniciales]]'' <blockquote>"there is a strong interest in publishing scientific news, usually linked to a certain atheist and [[anti-theist]] obsession, philosophy which will also work for pointing out the incompatibility between science and religion, faith, and reason. In this way, there will be a lot of talk on [[Charles Darwin]]'s theories or on the negation of the existence of the [[soul]]".<ref>{{Cite web|year=2007|title=El anarquismo individualista en España (1923–1939)|author=Xavier Diez|url=http://www.viruseditorial.net/pdf/anarquismo%2520individualista.pdf|access-date=2023-01-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120324044614/http://www.viruseditorial.net/pdf/anarquismo%2520individualista.pdf |archive-date=2012-03-24|page=152 }}</ref></blockquote>

In 1901, the Catalan anarchist and freethinker [[Francesc Ferrer i Guàrdia]] established "modern" or [[Progressive education|progressive schools]] in [[Barcelona]] in defiance of an educational system controlled by the [[Catholic Church]].<ref name="Fidler">{{cite journal|author=Geoffrey C. Fidler|date=Spring–Summer 1985|title=The Escuela Moderna Movement of Francisco Ferrer: "Por la Verdad y la Justicia"|journal=History of Education Quarterly|volume=25|issue= 1/2|pages=103–32|doi=10.2307/368893|jstor=368893|s2cid=147119437}}</ref> The schools had the stated goal to "[[Popular education|educate the working class]] in a rational, secular and non-coercive setting". Fiercely anti-clerical, Ferrer believed in "freedom in education", education free from the authority of church and state.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/spain/ferrer.html|title=Francisco Ferrer's Modern School|publisher=Flag.blackened.net|access-date=2010-09-20|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100807032003/http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/spain/ferrer.html|archive-date=2010-08-07}}</ref>{{failed verification|date= June 2019}} Ferrer's ideas, generally, formed the inspiration for a series of [[Ferrer Center and Colony|Modern Schools]] in the United States,<ref name="Fidler"/> [[Cuba]], [[South America]], and [[London]]. The first of these started in [[New York City]] in 1911. Ferrer also inspired the Italian newspaper [[Università popolare (Italian newspaper)| ''Università popolare'']], founded in 1901.<ref name="Fidler"/>

==Freethinking in Freemasonry==
{{Summarize section|date=July 2024}}

[[Freemasonry]] served an important purpose in the spreading of the freethinking movement, Freemason lodges in 18th century Europe served as sites for enlightenment thinking and discussion of new ideas, helping spread freethought philosophies. The informal, secretive nature of the lodges allowed intellectuals and elites to gather and debate radical topics away from the scrutiny of church and state.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Fitzpatrick |first1=M. |last2=Jones |first2=P. |last3=Knellwolf |first3=C. |last4=McCalman |first4=I. |date=2004 |title=The Enlightenment World |publisher=Routledge}}</ref>

Freemasonry attracted many freethinkers and became a hub of the movement, during the Enlightenment era due to its emphasis on  inclusive membership, [[logic]], [[rationalism]], and [[religious tolerance]].<ref name="jacob">{{cite book |last=Jacob |first=Margaret C. |title=Living the Enlightenment: [[Freemasonry]] and Politics in Eighteenth-Century Europe |date=1991 |publisher=Oxford University Press}}</ref> Freemasonry's origins from stonemason guilds meant its symbolism and rituals drew on concepts from the [[Trivium]] and [[Quadrivium]], they include the Mastery of [[Grammar]], [[Rhetoric]], logic then mastery of [[arithmetic]], [[geometry]], [[music]], and [[astronomy]] as well as other arts such as the [[Artes mechanicae|mechanical arts]], reflecting Enlightenment ideals in the goal of making its members Masters of their thoughts and opinions thus making them Freethinkers.<ref name="stevenson">{{cite book |last=Stevenson |first=David |title=The Origins of Freemasonry |date=1988 |publisher=Cambridge University Press|pages=179–203}}</ref> This distinguished Freemasonry from other fraternal orders focused on chivalry or Christian morality.<ref name="jacob"/>

===Rationalism and science===

[[File:Atelier de Nicolas de Largillière, portrait de Voltaire (musée Carnavalet).jpg|thumb|upright|[[Voltaire]]]]
Due to Freemasonry utilizing extensive symbols and allegories related to mathematics, geometry, and architecture, conveying the importance of reason and science,<ref name="stevenson"/> and the central Masonic symbol of the compass and square represented logic and rigor<ref name="berman">{{cite book|last=Berman|first=Ric|title=Foundations of Modern Freemasonry|date=2012|pages=57–63}}</ref> as well references to the "Great Architect of the Universe", these concepts were interpreted as a deist scientific creator by Enlightenment freethinkers.

Influential early Speculative Masonic writings by James Anderson and [[John Theophilus Desaguliers|Jean-Theophile Desaguliers]] frequently cited [[Isaac Newton]] and promoted Newtonian scientific ideas.<ref name="berman"/> Desaguliers was a close friend and student of Newton, further spreading Newton's theories to lodges.<ref name="berman"/> Geometry textbooks and lectures were common in early lodges, aligning with Enlightenment interest in mathematics and science.<ref name="stevenson"/>

Freemasonry's multi-tiered system of [[Initiation|initiation rituals]] allegorically used the tools, stages, and concepts of architecture and mechanics to represent enlightenment and self-improvement through education and reason.<ref name="stevenson"/> This resonated with freethinkers' belief in perfecting society through spreading knowledge.

===Religious tolerance===
[[File:Bronze statue of Giordano Bruno by Ettore Ferrari , Campo de' Fiori, Roma.jpg|thumb|upright|In 1889, a statue of [[Giordano Bruno]] was erected at the site of his execution, by freethinkers from several countries.]]

Unlike most contemporary fraternal orders, Freemasonry did not require its members to follow a specific religious creed.<ref name="jacob"/> This openness allowed men of diverse faiths, including freethinkers and deists, to join local lodges throughout [[Europe]] and [[United States|America]] in the Enlightenment era. While utilizing religious imagery and themes, Freemasonry intentionally avoided dogmatic disputes and focused its moral lessons on shared values of virtue, charity, and righteousness.<ref name="jacob"/>

This religious tolerance attracted Enlightenment thinkers, like [[Voltaire]], who viewed organized religion as upholding oppressive traditional monarchs and hindering free thought.<ref name="israel">{{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan |title=Enlightenment Contested |date=2006 |publisher=Oxford University Press |pages=3–28}}</ref> Benjamin Franklin praised Masonic principles of "liberality, tolerance and unity in essentials, leaving each Brother to his own opinions on non-essentials" in his writings.<ref name="franklin">{{cite book |last=Franklin |first=Benjamin |authorlink=Benjamin Franklin |title=The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin |date=2004 |publisher=Dover Publications |page=106}}</ref>

===Political liberalism===
Many Enlightenment freethinkers perceived established religion as upholding traditional monarchies and oppressing free thought.<ref name="israel"/> Consequently, the secrecy and hierarchical Initiatory structure of Freemasonry alarmed some authoritarian states, concerned it could encourage liberal revolutionary ideas.<ref name="berman"/>

However, most Masonic lodges mainly aimed to promote morality, sociability, and philanthropic causes rather than radical politics.<ref name="jacob"/> Values of freethinking, liberty, equality, and opposition to tyranny were also celebrated in Masonic rituals and writings.<ref name="stevenson"/> This intellectual spirit likely contributed to many Freemasons supporting independence movements and participating as Founding Fathers of the United States.<ref name="bullock">{{cite book|last=Bullock|first=Steven C.|title=Revolutionary Brotherhood|date=2011}}</ref>

In the 19th and 20th centuries, some authoritarian states also suspected Freemasonry of encouraging liberal freethinking philosophies and suppressed Masonic lodges.

===Pursuit of mastery===
A core goal of Freemasonry's initiatory system is to guide men's intellectual and moral development towards mastery and enlightenment.<ref name="stevenson"/> Masonic rituals and degrees symbolically depict the passage from an Apprentice to Fellowcraft to Master Mason as a metaphor for independent learning and self-improvement to the goal of becoming a Master of himself, thus a full freethinker.<ref name="berman"/>

Attaining mastery is presented as freeing a man's mind from reliance on [[Authority|authorities]] and [[Dogma|dogmas]] so he can autonomously reason and have educated opinions.<ref name="bullock"/> The perfectibility of human nature through education and liberty is a key theme. This aligns with freethinkers' views on thinking for oneself using logic and empiricism.

==See also==
{{Columns-list|colwidth=27em|
* [[Brights movement]]
* [[Critical rationalism]]
* [[Ethical movement]]
* [[Secular humanism]]
* [[Freethought Association of Canada]]
* [[Freethought Day]]
* [[Religious skepticism]]
}}

==Notes and references==
{{Reflist|30em}}

==Further reading==
* Alexander, Nathan G. (2019). ''Race in a Godless World: Atheism, Race, and Civilization, 1850-1914''. New York/Manchester: New York University Press/Manchester University Press. {{ISBN|978-1526142375}}
* Alexander Nathan G. [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-gilded-age-and-progressive-era/article/unclasping-the-eagles-talons-mark-twain-american-freethought-and-the-responses-to-imperialism/F85104CA5DCB59134C7D67CAC8BB7914 "Unclasping the Eagle's Talons: Mark Twain, American Freethought, and the Responses to Imperialism."] ''The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era'' 17, no. 3 (2018): 524–545.
* [[J. B. Bury|Bury, John Bagnell]]. (1913). [https://archive.org/details/historyoffreedomft00bury ''A History of Freedom of Thought'']. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
* [[Susan Jacoby|Jacoby, Susan]]. (2004). ''Freethinkers: A History of American Secularism''. New York: Metropolitan Books. {{ISBN|0-8050-7442-2}}
* [[Samuel Porter Putnam|Putnam, Samuel Porter]]. (1894). [https://archive.org/details/400yearsoffreeth00putn ''Four Hundred Years of Freethought'']. New York: Truth Seeker Company.
* [[Edward Royle|Royle, Edward]]. (1974). [https://web.archive.org/web/20051030113212/http://www.secularism.org.uk/uploads/3542a971e965ac1647844952.pdf ''Victorian Infidels: The Origins of the British Secularist Movement, 1791–1866'']. Manchester: Manchester University Press. {{ISBN|0-7190-0557-4}}
* Royle, Edward. (1980). ''Radicals, Secularists and Republicans: popular freethought in Britain, 1866–1915''. Manchester: Manchester University Press. {{ISBN|0-7190-0783-6}}
* [[David Tribe|Tribe, David]]. (1967). ''100 Years of Freethought''. London: Elek Books.

==External links==
{{wikiquote}}
{{Wikisource|A Biographical Dictionary of Ancient, Medieval, and Modern Freethinkers}} 
* {{usurped|1=[https://archive.today/20130510204140/http://www.angoraspace.com/ Freethinker Indonesia]}}
* [http://atheistfoundation.org.au/article/a-history-of-freethought A History of Freethought]
* {{cite NIE|wstitle=Freethinker|year=1905 |short=x}}
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPDWB0iD77E Freethought In A Nutshell by the North Texas Church of Freethought] (video on [[YouTube]])
* [https://independent.academia.edu/NolanAljaddou Freethought on Academia.edu]

{{Portal bar|Philosophy|Psychology}}

{{Irreligion}}
{{Anarchism}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Freethought| ]]
[[Category:Epistemology of religion]]