Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Hull–White model
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Model of future interest rates}} In [[financial mathematics]], the '''Hull–White model''' is a [[mathematical model|model]] of future [[interest rate]]s. In its most generic formulation, it belongs to the class of no-arbitrage models that are able to fit today's term structure of interest rates. It is relatively straightforward to translate the mathematical description of the evolution of future interest rates onto a [[Lattice model (finance)|tree or lattice]] and so [[interest rate derivative]]s such as [[bermudan swaption]]s can be valued in the model. The first Hull–White model was described by [[John C. Hull (economist)|John C. Hull]] and [[Alan White (economist)|Alan White]] in 1990. The model is still popular in the market today. ==The model== ===One-factor model=== The model is a [[short-rate model]]. In general, it has the following dynamics: :<math>dr(t) = \left[\theta(t) - \alpha(t) r(t)\right]\,dt + \sigma(t)\, dW(t).</math> There is a degree of ambiguity among practitioners about exactly which parameters in the model are time-dependent or what name to apply to the model in each case. The most commonly accepted naming convention is the following: *<math>\theta</math> has ''t'' (time) dependence — '''the Hull–White model'''. *<math>\theta</math> and <math>\alpha</math> are both time-dependent — '''the extended [[Vasicek model]]'''. ===Two-factor model=== The two-factor Hull–White model {{harvcol|Hull|2006|pp=657–658}} contains an additional disturbance term whose mean reverts to zero, and is of the form: :<math>d\,f(r(t)) = \left [\theta(t) + u - \alpha(t)\,f(r(t))\right ]dt + \sigma_1(t)\, dW_1(t),</math> where <math>\displaystyle f</math> is a deterministic function, typically the identity function (extension of the one-factor version, analytically tractable, and with potentially negative rates), the natural logarithm (extension of the [[Black–Karasinski model]], not analytically tractable, and with positive interest rates), or combinations (proportional to the natural logarithm on small rates and proportional to the identity function on large rates); and <math>\displaystyle u</math> has an initial value of 0 and follows the process: :<math>du = -bu\,dt + \sigma_2\,dW_2(t)</math> ==Analysis of the one-factor model== For the rest of this article we assume only <math>\theta </math> has ''t''-dependence. Neglecting the stochastic term for a moment, notice that for <math>\alpha > 0</math> the change in ''r'' is negative if ''r'' is currently "large" (greater than <math>\theta(t)/\alpha)</math> and positive if the current value is small. That is, the stochastic process is a [[Regression toward the mean|mean-reverting]] [[Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process]]. θ is calculated from the initial [[yield curve]] describing the current term structure of interest rates. Typically α is left as a user input (for example it may be estimated from historical data). σ is determined via [[calibration]] to a set of [[Interest rate cap and floor|caplets]] and [[swaption]]s readily tradeable in the market. When <math>\alpha</math>, <math>\theta</math>, and <math>\sigma</math> are constant, [[Itô's lemma]] can be used to prove that :<math> r(t) = e^{-\alpha t}r(0) + \frac{\theta}{\alpha} \left(1- e^{-\alpha t}\right) + \sigma e^{-\alpha t}\int_0^t e^{\alpha u}\,dW(u),</math> which has distribution :<math>r(t) \sim \mathcal{N}\left(e^{-\alpha t} r(0) + \frac{\theta}{\alpha} \left(1- e^{-\alpha t}\right), \frac{\sigma^2}{2\alpha} \left(1-e^{-2\alpha t}\right)\right),</math> where <math>\mathcal{N}( \mu ,\sigma^2 )</math> is the [[normal distribution]] with mean <math>\mu</math> and variance <math>\sigma^2</math>. When <math>\theta(t)</math> is time-dependent, :<math> r(t) = e^{-\alpha t}r(0) + \int_{0}^{t}e^{\alpha(s-t)}\theta(s)ds + \sigma e^{-\alpha t}\int_0^t e^{\alpha u}\,dW(u),</math> which has distribution :<math>r(t) \sim \mathcal{N}\left(e^{-\alpha t} r(0) + \int_{0}^{t}e^{\alpha(s-t)}\theta(s)ds, \frac{\sigma^2}{2\alpha} \left(1-e^{-2\alpha t}\right)\right).</math> ==Bond pricing using the Hull–White model== It turns out that the time-''S'' value of the ''T''-maturity [[discount bond]] has distribution (note the ''affine term'' structure here!) :<math>P(S,T) = A(S,T)\exp(-B(S,T)r(S)),</math> where :<math> B(S,T) = \frac{1-\exp(-\alpha(T-S))}{\alpha} ,</math> :<math> A(S,T) = \frac{P(0,T)}{P(0,S)}\exp\left( \, -B(S,T) \frac{\partial\log(P(0,S))}{\partial S} - \frac{\sigma^2(\exp(-\alpha T)-\exp(-\alpha S))^2(\exp(2\alpha S)-1)}{4\alpha^3}\right) .</math> Note that their terminal distribution for <math>P(S,T)</math> is [[log-normal distribution|distributed log-normally]]. ==Derivative pricing== By selecting as [[numeraire]] the time-''S'' bond (which corresponds to switching to the ''S''-forward measure), we have from the [[fundamental theorem of arbitrage-free pricing]], the value at time ''t'' of a derivative which has payoff at time ''S''. :<math>V(t) = P(t,S)\mathbb{E}_S[V(S) \mid \mathcal{F}(t)].</math> Here, <math>\mathbb{E}_S</math> is the expectation taken with respect to the [[forward measure]]. Moreover, standard arbitrage arguments show that the time ''T'' forward price <math>F_V(t,T)</math> for a payoff at time ''T'' given by ''V(T)'' must satisfy <math>F_V(t,T) = V(t)/P(t,T)</math>, thus :<math>F_V(t,T) = \mathbb{E}_T[V(T)\mid\mathcal{F}(t)].</math> Thus it is possible to value many derivatives ''V'' dependent solely on a single bond <math>P(S,T)</math> analytically when working in the Hull–White model. For example, in the case of a [[put option|bond put]] :<math>V(S) = (K-P(S,T))^+.</math> Because <math>P(S,T)</math> is lognormally distributed, the general calculation used for the [[Black–Scholes model]] shows that :<math>{E}_S[(K-P(S,T))^{+}] = KN(-d_2) - F(t,S,T)N(-d_1),</math> where :<math>d_1 = \frac{\log(F/K) + \sigma_P^2S/2}{\sigma_P \sqrt{S}}</math> and :<math>d_2 = d_1 - \sigma_P \sqrt{S}.</math> Thus today's value (with the ''P''(0,''S'') multiplied back in and ''t'' set to 0) is: :<math>P(0,S)KN(-d_2) - P(0,T)N(-d_1).</math> Here <math>\sigma_P</math> is the standard deviation (relative volatility) of the log-normal distribution for <math>P(S,T)</math>. A fairly substantial amount of algebra shows that it is related to the original parameters via :<math>\sqrt{S}\sigma_P =\frac{\sigma}{\alpha}(1-\exp(-\alpha(T-S)))\sqrt{\frac{1-\exp(-2\alpha S)}{2\alpha}}.</math> Note that this expectation was done in the ''S''-bond measure, whereas we did not specify a measure at all for the original Hull–White process. This does not matter — the volatility is all that matters and is measure-independent. Because [[interest rate caps/floors]] are equivalent to bond puts and calls respectively, the above analysis shows that caps and floors can be priced analytically in the Hull–White model. [[Jamshidian's trick]] applies to Hull–White (as today's value of a swaption in the Hull–White model is a [[monotonic function]] of today's short rate). Thus knowing how to price caps is also sufficient for pricing swaptions. In the event that the underlying is a compounded backward-looking rate rather than a (forward-looking) LIBOR term rate, Turfus (2020) shows how this formula can be straightforwardly modified to take into account the additional [[convex function|convexity]]. Swaptions can also be priced directly as described in Henrard (2003). Direct implementations are usually more efficient. ==Monte-Carlo simulation, trees and lattices== However, valuing vanilla instruments such as caps and swaptions is useful primarily for calibration. The real use of the model is to value somewhat more [[exotic derivatives]] such as [[bermudan swaption]]s on a [[Lattice model (finance)|lattice]], or other derivatives in a multi-currency context such as Quanto Constant Maturity Swaps, as explained for example in Brigo and Mercurio (2001). The efficient and exact [[Monte-Carlo simulation]] of the Hull–White model with time dependent parameters can be easily performed, see Ostrovski (2013) and (2016). An open-source implementation of the exact [[Monte-Carlo simulation]] following Fries (2016)<ref>{{cite journal |last= Fries |first= Christian |date=2016 |title=A Short Note on the Exact Stochastic Simulation Scheme of the Hull-White Model and Its Implementation |url=https://ssrn.com/abstract=2737091 |journal=SSRN |doi=10.2139/ssrn.2737091 |access-date=October 15, 2023|url-access=subscription }}</ref> can be found in finmath lib.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://github.com/finmath/finmath-lib/blob/master/src/main/java/net/finmath/montecarlo/interestrate/models/HullWhiteModel.java |title=HullWhiteModel.java |website=finmath lib |publisher=finmath.net |access-date=October 15, 2023}}</ref> ==Forecasting== Even though single factor models such as Vasicek, CIR and Hull–White model has been devised for pricing, recent research has shown their potential with regard to forecasting. In Orlando et al. (2018,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Orlando |first1=Giuseppe |last2=Mininni |first2=Rosa Maria |last3=Bufalo |first3=Michele |title=A New Approach to CIR Short-Term Rates Modelling |journal=New Methods in Fixed Income Modeling |series=Contributions to Management Science |date=2018 |pages=35–43 |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-95285-7_2 |publisher=Springer International Publishing|isbn=978-3-319-95284-0 }}</ref> 2019,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Orlando |first1=Giuseppe |last2=Mininni |first2=Rosa Maria |last3=Bufalo |first3=Michele |title=A new approach to forecast market interest rates through the CIR model |journal=Studies in Economics and Finance |date=1 January 2019 |volume=37 |issue=2 |pages=267–292 |doi=10.1108/SEF-03-2019-0116 |s2cid=204424299 |issn=1086-7376}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Orlando |first1=Giuseppe |last2=Mininni |first2=Rosa Maria |last3=Bufalo |first3=Michele |title=Interest rates calibration with a CIR model |journal=The Journal of Risk Finance |date=19 August 2019 |volume=20 |issue=4 |pages=370–387 |doi=10.1108/JRF-05-2019-0080 |s2cid=204435499 |language=en |issn=1526-5943}}</ref>) was provided a new methodology to forecast future interest rates called CIR#. The ideas, apart from turning a short-rate model used for pricing into a forecasting tool, lies in an appropriate partitioning of the dataset into subgroups according to a given distribution <ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Orlando|first1=Giuseppe|last2=Mininni|first2=Rosa Maria|last3=Bufalo|first3=Michele|date=July 2020|title=Forecasting interest rates through Vasicek and CIR models: A partitioning approach|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/for.2642|journal=Journal of Forecasting|language=en|volume=39|issue=4|pages=569–579|doi=10.1002/for.2642|issn=0277-6693|arxiv=1901.02246|s2cid=126507446 }}</ref>). In there it was shown how the said partitioning enables capturing statistically significant time changes in volatility of interest rates. following the said approach, Orlando et al. (2021) <ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Orlando|first1=Giuseppe|last2=Bufalo|first2=Michele|date=2021-05-26|title=Interest rates forecasting: Between Hull and White and the CIR#—How to make a single‐factor model work|journal=Journal of Forecasting|volume=40 |issue=8 |language=en|pages=1566–1580|doi=10.1002/for.2783|issn=0277-6693|doi-access=free}}</ref>) compares the Hull–White model with the CIR model in terms of forecasting and prediction of interest rate directionality. ==See also== * [[Vasicek model]] * [[Cox–Ingersoll–Ross model]] * [[Black–Karasinski model]] ==References== {{Reflist}} ;Primary references *John Hull and Alan White, "Using Hull–White interest rate trees," ''Journal of Derivatives'', Vol. 3, No. 3 (Spring 1996), pp. 26–36 *John Hull and Alan White, "Numerical procedures for implementing term structure models I," ''Journal of Derivatives'', Fall 1994, pp. 7–16. *John Hull and Alan White, "Numerical procedures for implementing term structure models II," ''Journal of Derivatives'', Winter 1994, pp. 37–48. *John Hull and Alan White, "The pricing of options on interest rate caps and floors using the Hull–White model" in ''Advanced Strategies in Financial Risk Management'', Chapter 4, pp. 59–67. *John Hull and Alan White, "One factor interest rate models and the valuation of interest rate derivative securities," ''Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis'', Vol 28, No 2, (June 1993) pp. 235–254. *John Hull and Alan White, "Pricing interest-rate derivative securities", ''The Review of Financial Studies'', Vol 3, No. 4 (1990) pp. 573–592. ;Other references *{{cite book |last= Hull|first= John C.|authorlink= John C. Hull (economist)|title= Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives|url= https://archive.org/details/optionsfuturesot00hull_429|url-access= limited|edition= 6th|year=2006 |publisher= [[Prentice Hall]] |location= [[Upper Saddle River, New Jersey|Upper Saddle River, N.J]] |isbn= 0-13-149908-4 |oclc= 60321487 |pages= [https://archive.org/details/optionsfuturesot00hull_429/page/n682 657]–658 |chapter= Interest Rate Derivatives: Models of the Short Rate |lccn= 2005047692 }} *{{cite book | title = Interest Rate Models — Theory and Practice with Smile, Inflation and Credit| author = [[Damiano Brigo]], [[Fabio Mercurio]] | publisher = Springer Verlag | year = 2001 | edition = 2nd ed. 2006 | isbn = 978-3-540-22149-4}} *Henrard, Marc (2003). "Explicit Bond Option and Swaption Formula in Heath–Jarrow–Morton One Factor Model," ''International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance'', 6(1), 57–72. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=434860 Preprint SSRN]. *Henrard, Marc (2009). Efficient swaptions price in Hull–White one factor model, arXiv, 0901.1776v1. [https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.1776 Preprint arXiv]. *Ostrovski, Vladimir (2013). Efficient and Exact Simulation of the Hull–White Model, [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2304848 Preprint SSRN.] *Ostrovski, Vladimir (2016). Efficient and Exact Simulation of the Gaussian Affine Interest Rate Models., ''International Journal of Financial Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 02.'',[https://ssrn.com/abstract=2837229 Preprint SSRN.] *Puschkarski, Eugen. [https://web.archive.org/web/*/www.angelfire.com/ny/financeinfo/Diplomnew.ppt ''Implementation of Hull–White's No-Arbitrage Term Structure Model''], Diploma Thesis, Center for Central European Financial Markets *Turfus, Colin (2020). Caplet Pricing with Backward-Looking Rates., [https://ssrn.com/abstract=3527091 Preprint SSRN.] *Letian Wang, [https://web.archive.org/web/20110723221130/http://www.letianwang.net/Fixed_Income/09_Hull-White_Model.htm ''Hull–White Model''], Fixed Income Quant Group, DTCC (detailed numeric example and derivation) {{Bond market}} {{Stochastic processes}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Hull-White model}} [[Category:Interest rates]] [[Category:Fixed income analysis]] [[Category:Short-rate models]] [[Category:Financial models]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Bond market
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Harvcol
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Stochastic processes
(
edit
)