Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Incubator escapee wiki:Featured article candidates/Googie
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===[[Googie]]=== An interesting article about an unusual type of architecture that everyone knows, even if they don't realize that it has a name (think ''[[Jetsons]]''. I am promised that more pictures are forthcoming. Certainly worthy of people's attention. [[User:Danny|Danny]] 00:21, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC) *An interesting article, indeed, but not remotely in the ballpark of featured status. Compare [[Palladian architecture]]. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 00:31, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC) *I agree; compare it also to the [http://www.spaceagecity.com/googie/ Googie Architecture Online] site that it references to see how much more comprehensive it could be. Still, the topic is interesting and the article is a good start. [[User:Stevenj|—Steven G. Johnson]] 00:41, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC) *'''Object''' waaaay too early for this to be considered for FAC, has minimal information. Articles for FAC consideration should be comprehensive, this does not have that feeling. [[User:Alkivar|Alkivar]] 00:51, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC) *'''Object'''. Not comprehensive yet, but a good start. Try to compare to other architecture articles and expand. [[User:MacGyverMagic|[[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|<sup>[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|(talk)]]</sup>]] 09:12, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC) *'''Object''': This is not a bad page, and its an interesting and promising article, but it needs a lot more information. A longer lead, then definitions or the rules of the form, or was it a free style of an era - that sort of thing. Then more examples, and if possible illustrations and plans, of exponent architects and their work. Was it domestic, civic, monumental or merely a gimmick? Why was it not given credence in its own lifetime? Is it confined to USA or known by an alternative name elsewhere? Why is it so called? It would be great to see this bought up to featured standard, suggest the nominator withdraws it for a couple of weeks, and addresses and expands a few points [[User:Giano|Giano]] 13:24, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC) ::I have just made a small re-write to the lead section, but above comments still stand [[User:Giano|Giano]] 14:07, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC) *'''Object.''' The very first thing I wanted to know when I glanced at the article was "who coined the names ''Googie'' and/or ''Populuxe,'' what is their derivation, and what are they supposed to evoke?" The article doesn't say. Compare [[Art Deco]]... [[User:Dpbsmith|[[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] [[User_talk:dpbsmith|(talk)]]]] 20:53, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC) *'''Stall''' This is premature. The entry is still just a sketch. Great images are needed, and they are all around us. --[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] 00:48, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)