Editing Introjection

{{Short description|Psychological process}}
{{merge portions from|Internalization (sociology)|date=November 2023|discuss=Talk:Internalization_(sociology)#Sociology_and_psychology}}
{{Confusing|reason=the sentence structure is too terse and assumes a greater working knowledge of the concept and of technical terminology than a typical Wikipedia reader would possess. Lacks context.|date=October 2021}}
{{for|the anime episode|Introjection (Neon Genesis Evangelion episode)}}
In [[psychology]], '''introjection''' (also known as '''identification''' or '''internalization''')<ref name="Jaffe">{{cite book |last1=Jaffe |first1=Charles M. |title=Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy |chapter=Introjection in Psychoanalytic Couple and Family Therapy |date=24 August 2018 |pages=1–2 |publisher=Springer, Cham |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_12-1 |isbn=978-3-319-15877-8 |s2cid=220278667 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_12-1#howtocite}}</ref> is the [[Unconscious mind|unconscious]] adoption of the thoughts or [[personality]] traits of others.<ref name="APA">{{cite web |title=The American Psychological Association Dictionary of Psychology |url=https://dictionary.apa.org/introjection |website=www.apa.org |publisher=American Psychological Association |access-date=30 October 2021 | quote=a process in which an individual unconsciously incorporates... the attitudes, values, and qualities of another person or a part of another person’s personality. Introjection may occur, for example, in the mourning process for a loved one.}}</ref> It occurs as a normal part of development, such as a child taking on [[Parent|parental]] values and attitudes. It can also be a [[defense mechanism]] in situations that arouse [[anxiety]].<ref name="APA"/>
It has been associated with both normal and [[pathological]] development.<ref name="Jaffe"/>

== Theory ==

Introjection is a concept rooted in the psychoanalytic theories of [[Unconscious mind|unconscious motivations]].<ref name="Jaffe"/> Unconscious motivation refers to processes in the [[mind]] which occur automatically and bypass conscious examination and considerations.<ref name="Westen1999">{{cite journal |last1=Westen |first1=Drew |year=1999 |title=The Scientific Status of Unconscious Processes: Is Freud Really Dead? |journal=Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association |volume=47 |issue=4 |pages=1061–1106 |doi=10.1177/000306519904700404 |pmid=10650551 |s2cid=207080 }}</ref>

Introjection is the learning process or in some cases a defense mechanism where a person unconsciously absorbs experiences and makes them part of their psyche.<ref name="Jaffe"/>

===In learning=== 
In [[psychoanalysis]], introjection ({{langx|de|Introjektion}}) refers to an unconscious process wherein one takes components of another [[Personal identity|person's identity]], such as [[feeling]]s, experiences and cognitive functioning,<ref name=":222">{{Cite journal|last=Hinshelwood|first=R. D.|author-link=R. D. Hinshelwood|date=1995|title=The Social Relocation of Personal Identity as Shown by Psychoanalytic Observations of Splitting, Projection, and Introjection|url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/245092|journal=Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology|language=en|volume=2|issue=3|pages=185–204|issn=1086-3303}}</ref> and transfers them inside themselves, making such experiences part of their new [[Psyche (psychology)|psychic]] structure.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Jaffe|first=Charles M.|chapter=Introjection in Psychoanalytic Couple and Family Therapy |date=2018|title=Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy|chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_12-1|language=en|pages=1–2|doi=10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_12-1|isbn=978-3-319-15877-8 |s2cid=220278667 }}</ref> These components are obliterated from consciousness ([[Splitting (psychology)|splitting]]), perceived in someone else ([[Psychological projection|projection]]),<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Malancharuvil|first=Joseph M.|date=2004-12-01|title=Projection, Introjection, and Projective Identification: A Reformulation|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s11231-004-4325-y|journal=The American Journal of Psychoanalysis|language=en|volume=64|issue=4|pages=375–382|doi=10.1007/s11231-004-4325-y|pmid=15577283 |s2cid=19730486 |issn=1573-6741|url-access=subscription}}</ref> and then experienced and performed (i.e., introjected) by that other person.<ref name=":222"/> Cognate concepts are [[Identification (psychology)|identification]], incorporation<ref>A form of taking the outside world into the inner world, being focused on bodily sensation.</ref> and [[Internalization (sociology)|internalization]].

===As a defense mechanism=== 
It is considered a self-stabilizing [[Defence mechanisms|defense mechanism]] used when there is a lack of full psychological contact between a child and the adults providing that child's psychological needs.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kBVWDwAAQBAJ&dq=Introjection+relational+mechanism&pg=PT35|title=Relational Patterns, Therapeutic Presence: Concepts and Practice of Integrative Psychotherapy|last=Erskine|first=Richard G.|date=2018-04-17|publisher=Routledge|isbn=9780429918513|language=en}}</ref> In other words, it provides the illusion of maintaining relationship but at the expense of a loss of [[self]].<ref name=":0" /> To use a simple example, a person who picks up traits from their friends is introjecting.

Another straightforward illustration could be a youngster who is being bullied at school. Unknowingly adopting the bully's behavior, the victim youngster may do so to stop being picked on in the future.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Introjection, Internalization, Identification, Oh My! |url=https://therapistdevelopmentcenter.com/blog/introjection-internalization-identification-oh-my |access-date=2023-08-26 |website=Therapist Development Center |language=en}}</ref>

[[Psychological projection|Projection]] has been described as an early phase of introjection.<ref name="pmid15577283">{{cite journal |author=Malancharuvil JM |title=Projection, introjection, and projective identification: a reformulation |journal=Am J Psychoanal |volume=64 |issue=4 |pages=375–82 |date=December 2004 |pmid=15577283 |doi=10.1007/s11231-004-4325-y |s2cid=19730486 |url=http://www.kluweronline.com/art.pdf?issn=0002-9548&volume=64&page=375}}</ref>

==Historic precursors==
===Freud and Klein===
In Freudian terms, introjection is the aspect of the ego's system of relational mechanisms which handles checks and balances from a perspective external to what one normally considers 'oneself', infolding these inputs into the internal world of the self-definitions, where they can be weighed and balanced against one's various senses of externality. For example:
* "When a child envelops representational images of his absent parents into himself, simultaneously fusing them with his own personality." 
* "Individuals with weak ego [[Personal boundaries|boundaries]] are more prone to use introjection as a defense mechanism."
According to [[D. W. Winnicott]], "projection and introjection mechanisms... let the other person be the manager sometimes, and to hand over [[omnipotence]]."<ref>"Winnicott, D.W. ''Home is Where We Start From: Essays by a Psychoanalyst''. New York, London: W.W.
Norton & Company, 1986. 50.</ref>

According to Freud, the [[Id, ego and super-ego#Ego|ego]] and the [[superego]] are constructed by introjecting external behavioural patterns into the subject's own person. Specifically, he maintained that the critical agency or the superego could be accounted for in terms of introjection and that the superego derives from the parents or other figures of authority.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|title=Sigmund Freud|last=Wollheim|first=Richard|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1981|isbn=052128385X|location=Cambridge|pages=223}}</ref> The derived behavioural patterns are not necessarily reproductions as they actually are but incorporated or introjected versions of them.<ref name=":1" />

===Torok and Ferenczi===
However, the aforementioned description of introjection has been challenged by [[Maria Torok]] as she favours using the term as it is employed by [[Sándor Ferenczi]] in his essay "The Meaning of Introjection" (1912). In this context, introjection is an extension of autoerotic interests that broadens the ego by a lifting of repression so that it includes external objects in its make-up. Torok defends this meaning in her 1968 essay "The Illness of Mourning and the Fantasy of the Exquisite Corpse", where she argues that [[Sigmund Freud]] and [[Melanie Klein]] confuse introjection with incorporation and that Ferenczi's definition remains crucial to analysis. She emphasized that in failed [[mourning]] "the impotence of the process of introjection (gradual, slow, laborious, mediated, effective)" means that "incorporation is the only choice: fantasmatic, unmediated, instantaneous, magical, sometimes hallucinatory...'crypt' effects (of incorporation)".<ref>Jacques Derrida, "Foreword", Nicolas Abraham/Maria Torok, ''The Wolf Man's Secret Word'' (1986) p. xvii and p. 119n</ref>

===Fritz and Laura Perls===
In [[Gestalt therapy]], the concept of "introjection" is not identical with the psychoanalytical concept. Central to [[Fritz Perls|Fritz]] and [[Laura Perls]]' modifications was the concept of "dental or oral aggression", when the infant develops teeth and is able to chew. They set "introjection" against "assimilation". In ''Ego, Hunger and Aggression'',<ref>Perls, F., ''Ego, Hunger and Aggression'' (1942, 1947) {{ISBN|0-939266-18-0}}</ref> Fritz and Laura Perls suggested that when the infant develops teeth, he or she has the capacity to chew, to break apart food, and assimilate it, in contrast to swallowing before; and by analogy to experience, to taste, accept, reject or assimilate.
Laura Perls explains: "I think Freud said that development takes place through introjection, but if it remains introjection and goes no further, then it becomes a block; it becomes identification."<ref>Wysong, J./Rosenfeld, E.(eds.): ''An oral history of Gestalt therapy. Interviews with Laura Perls, Isadore From, Erving Polster, [[Miriam Polster]]'', Highland, N.Y. 1982, p. 6.</ref>

Thus Fritz and Laura Perls made "assimilation", as opposed to "introjection", a focal theme in Gestalt therapy and in their work, and the prime means by which growth occurs in therapy. In contrast to the psychoanalytic stance, in which the "patient" introjects the (presumably more healthy) interpretations of the analyst, in Gestalt therapy the client must "taste" with awareness their experience, and either accept or reject it, but not introject or "swallow whole". Hence, the emphasis is on avoiding interpretation, and instead encouraging discovery. This is the key point in the divergence of Gestalt therapy from traditional psychoanalysis: growth occurs through gradual assimilation of experience in a natural way, rather than by accepting the interpretations of the analyst.

== See also ==
{{Wiktionary pipe|introjection}}
*[[Internalization (sociology)]]
*[[Internalized oppression]]
*[[Internalizing disorder]]
*[[Labeling theory]]

== References ==
{{reflist}}

{{Defence mechanisms|state=collapsed}}
{{Parenting|state=collapsed}}

[[Category:Defence mechanisms]]
[[Category:Psychoanalytic terminology]]
[[Category:Freudian psychology]]