Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Jewish views on religious pluralism
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|None}} {{more citations needed|date=December 2014}} {{POV|date=December 2023}} {{Judaism}} [[Religious pluralism]] is a set of religious world views that hold that one's religion is not the sole and exclusive source of truth, and thus recognizes that some level of truth and value exists in other religions. As such, religious pluralism goes beyond [[religious tolerance]], which is the condition of peaceful existence between adherents of different religions or religious denominations. Within the Jewish community there lies a common history, a shared language of prayer, a shared Bible and a shared set of [[rabbinic literature]], thus allowing for Jews of significantly different world views to share some common values and goals. ==Classical Jewish views== ===General classical views on other religions=== Traditionally, Jews believe that God chose the Jewish people to be in a [[Jews as a chosen people|unique covenant with God]], described by the [[Torah]] itself, with particular obligations and responsibilities elucidated in the [[Oral Torah]]. Sometimes this choice is seen as charging the Jewish people with a specific mission: to be a [[light unto the nations]], practice [[Tikkun olam]] and to exemplify the [[Covenant (biblical)|covenant]] with God as described in the [[Torah]]. This view, however, did not preclude a belief that [[God]] has a relationship with other peoples{{em dash}}rather, Judaism held that God had entered into a covenant with all humankind, and that Jews and non-Jews alike have a relationship with God; each nation with its own unique relationship with God. Biblical references, as well as [[rabbinic literature]], support this view: [[Moses]] refers to the "God of the spirits of all flesh"({{bibleverse||Numbers|27:16|HE}}), and the [[Tanakh]] ([[Hebrew Bible]]) also identifies [[prophet]]s outside the community of Israel (e.g., [[Balaam|Baalam]]). Based on these statements, some rabbis theorized that, in the words of [[Natan'el al-Fayyumi|Nathanel ben Fayyumi]], a [[Yemenite Jews|Yemenite Jewish]] theologian of the 12th century, "God permitted to every people something he forbade to others...<nowiki>[and]</nowiki> God sends a prophet to every people according to their own language."(Levine, 1907/1966) The [[Mishnah]] states that, "Humanity was produced from one man, Adam, to show God's greatness. When a man mints a coin in a press, each coin is identical. But when the King of Kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, creates people in the form of Adam not one is similar to any other" ([[Sanhedrin (tractate)|Mishnah Sanhedrin]] 4:5). The Mishnah further states that anyone who kills or saves a single human life, Jewish or otherwise, has killed or saved an entire world. The [[Tosefta]], a supplement to the Mishnah, states: "[[Righteous among the Nations|Righteous people of all nations]] have a share in the [[Olam Haba|world to come]]" (Tosefta Sanhedrin 13:1; Sanhedrin 105a; also [[Maimonides]], [[Mishneh Torah]], ''Hilchot Teshuvah'' 3:4). The [[Midrash]] adds: "Why does the Holy One, blessed be He, love the righteous? Because righteousness is not due to inheritance or family connections... If a man wants to become a Kohen or a Levite, he cannot. Why? Because his father was neither a Kohen nor a Levite. However, if someone wants to become righteous, even if he is a gentile, he can, because righteousness is not inherited" ([[Numbers Rabbah]] 8:2). A traditional Jewish view is that rather than being obligated to obey all [[613 mitzvot]], the other nations of Earth need adhere only to a common list of commandments under seven categories that God required of the children of [[Noah]] known as the [[Seven Laws of Noah|Noahide laws]]. According to the [[Talmud]], the seven [[Noahide laws]] are; #{{Script/Hebrew|ืฉืคืืืช ืืืื}} ''Sh'fichat damim'', to refrain from bloodshed and [[murder]] #{{Script/Hebrew|ืืื ืื}} ''Dinim'', to establish [[laws]] and [[judiciary|courts of justice]] #{{Script/Hebrew|ืขืืืื ืืจื}} ''Avodah zarah'', to refrain from [[idolatry]] #{{Script/Hebrew|ืืจืืช ืืฉื}} ''Birkat Hashem,'', to refrain from [[blasphemy]] #{{Script/Hebrew|ืืืืื ืขืจืืืช}} ''Gilui Arayot'', to refrain from [[sexual immorality]] (traditionally, [[incest]], [[bestiality]], [[adultery]]) #{{Script/Hebrew|ืืื}} - ''Gezel'', to refrain from [[theft]] #{{Script/Hebrew|ืืืจ ืื ืืื}} ''Ever min ha'Chai'', to refrain from eating a limb torn from a still-living animal{{clarify|reason=Implications of ''Ever min ha-Hai'' (ืืืจ ืื ืืื)? No unnecessary cruelty to animals?|date=June 2013}} Any person who lives according to these laws is known as "righteous among the [[gentiles]]". [[Maimonides]] states that this refers to those who have acquired [[knowledge]] of [[God]] and act in accordance with the [[Noahide laws]]. In the 2nd century a sage in the [[Tosefta]] declared "the righteous of all nations have a share in the world to come." (Tosefta, Sanhedrin 13) Prophets of the Bible, while they repeatedly denounced the evils of the idolatrous nations (in addition to their denouncing the Jews' sins), they never call the nations to account for their idolatrous ''beliefs'' (i.e. worshiping multiple deities), but only for their evil ''actions'' (such as human sacrifice, murder, and miscarriages of justice). {{citation needed|date=January 2015}}. The Jerusalem Talmud, Tractate Peah, states: "{{Script/Hebrew|ืืชืื ืืืฉืคื ืืจื ืฆืืงื ืื ืืขื ื ืืื ืืงื"ื ืืฉืื ืืชื ืฉืืจื ืฉื ืขืืฉื ืืฆืืช ืืืื}}" "It is written, "Justice and abundant righteousness he does not withhold". [from here we see] God does not hold back from a non-Jew who does mitzvot.<ref>{{cite book|title=Talmud Yerushalmi: Zeraim|date=400|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=A3FIAQAAMAAJ&q=%22%D7%9B%D7%AA%D7%99%D7%91+%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%A4%D7%98++%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%91+%D7%A6%D7%93%D7%A7%D7%94+%D7%9C%D7%90+%D7%99%D7%A2%D7%A0%D7%94+%D7%90%D7%99%D7%9F%22&pg=PA124|access-date=18 November 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Talmรปd yฤrรปลกalmรฎ|orig-year=c. 400 |year=1609|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oaFEAAAAcAAJ&q=%22%D7%9B%D7%AA%D7%99%D7%91+%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%A4%D7%98+%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%91+%D7%A6%D7%93%D7%A7%D7%94+%D7%9C%D7%90+%D7%99%D7%A2%D7%A0%D7%94+%D7%90%D7%99%D7%9F%22&pg=PT11|access-date=18 November 2015}}</ref> ===Classical views on Christianity=== {{main|Christianity and Judaism}} [[Maimonides]], one of [[Judaism]]'s most important theologians and [[halakha|legal experts]], explained in detail why [[Jesus]] was wrong to create Christianity and why [[Muhammad]] was wrong to create [[Islam]]; he laments the pains Jews have suffered in persecution from followers of these new faiths as they attempted to supplant Judaism (in the case of Christianity, called [[Supersessionism]]). However, Maimonides then goes on to say that both faiths can be considered a positive part of God's plan to redeem the world. :''[[Jesus]] was instrumental [''or, "was an instrument"''] in changing the Torah and causing the world to err and serve another beside God. But it is beyond the human mind to fathom the designs of our Creator, for our ways are not God's ways, neither are our thoughts His. All these matters relating to Jesus of Nazareth, and the [[Ishmael]]ite [''i.e.'', [[Muhammad]]] who came after him, only served to clear the way for the [[Jewish Messiah]] to prepare the whole world to worship God with one accord, as it is written 'For then will I turn to the peoples a pure language, that they all call upon the name of the Lord to serve Him with one consent.' ({{bibleverse||Zephaniah|3:9|HE}}). Thus the [[Jewish eschatology|Jewish hope]], and the [[Torah]], and the [[mitzvot|commandments]] have become familiar topics of conversation among those even on far isles, and among many people, un[[Circumcision in the Bible|circumcised]] of flesh and heart.'' (Maimonides, [[Mishneh Torah]], XI.4.) The above paragraph was often censored from many printed versions where Christian censorship was felt.{{citation needed|date=January 2015}} ==Modern (post-Enlightenment era) Jewish views== ===Views on dialogue with non-Jews in general=== [[Conservative Judaism|Conservative]], [[Reform Judaism|Reform]], [[Reconstructionist Judaism|Reconstructionist]], and a few [[Modern Orthodox Judaism|Modern Orthodox]] rabbis engage in [[Interfaith dialogue|interfaith]] religious dialogue, while most Orthodox rabbis do not.{{citation needed|date=January 2015}} Rabbi Lord [[Immanuel Jakobovits]], former Chief Rabbi of the [[United Synagogue]] of [[Great Britain]], describes a commonly held Jewish view on this issue: {{citation needed|date=January 2015}} <blockquote>"Yes, I do believe in the Chosen people concept as affirmed by Judaism in its holy writ, its prayers, and its millennial tradition. In fact, I believe that every people - and indeed, in a more limited way, every individual - is "chosen" or destined for some distinct purpose in advancing the designs of [[Divine Providence|Providence]]. Only, some fulfill their mission and others do not. Maybe the [[ancient Greece|Greeks]] were chosen for their unique contributions to [[art]] and [[philosophy]], the [[ancient Rome|Romans]] for their pioneering services in [[law]] and [[government]], the [[United Kingdom|British]] for bringing [[parliament]]ary rule into the world, and the [[United States|Americans]] for piloting [[democracy]] in a pluralistic society. The Jews were chosen by God to be 'peculiar unto Me' as the pioneers of [[religion]] and [[morality]]; that was and is their national purpose."</blockquote> The German-Jewish philosopher [[Moses Mendelssohn]] (1729โ1786) taught that "According to the basic principles of my religion I am not to seek to convert anyone not born into our laws....We believe that the other nations of the Earth are directed by God to observe only the [[Natural law|law of nature]] and the [[Abrahamic religion|religion of the Patriarchs]]...I fancy that whosoever leads men to virtue in this life cannot be damned in the next."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Moses |first1=Mendelsohn |last2=Richard |first2=Levy |title=Open Letter to Deacon Lavater of Zurich from Moses Mendelssohn |url=https://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf/eng/15_TheJews_Doc.2_English.pdf |publisher=German History in Documents and Images |access-date=16 March 2023}}</ref>{{vague|date=January 2015}} According to the [[Jewish Encyclopedia]] article on [http://jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=142&letter=G#543 Gentile: Gentiles May Not Be Taught the Torah], {{dubious|date=January 2015}}{{vague|date=January 2015}} Rabbi [[Jacob Emden]] (1697โ1776) claimed: {{cquote|... the original intention of Jesus, and especially of [[Paul of Tarsus|Paul]], was to convert only the Gentiles to the [[Seven Laws of Noah|seven moral laws of Noah]] and to let the Jews follow the [[613 Commandments|Mosaic law]]{{snd}} which explains the apparent contradictions in the [[New Testament]] regarding the [[Biblical law in Christianity|laws of Moses]] and the [[Biblical Sabbath|Sabbath]].}} ===Views on Jewish-Christian dialogue{{POV statement|date=January 2015}}=== ====Joseph Soloveitchik==== In practice, the predominant position of Modern Orthodoxy on this issue is based on the position of Rabbi [[Joseph Soloveitchik]] in an essay entitled ''Confrontation''. He held that Judaism and Christianity are "two faith communities (which are) intrinsically antithetic". In his view "the language of faith of a particular community is totally incomprehensible to the man of a different faith community. Hence the confrontation should occur not at a theological, but at a mundane human level... the great encounter between man and God is a holy, personal and private affair, incomprehensible to the outsider..." As such, he ruled that theological dialogue between Judaism and Christianity was not possible. However, Soloveitchik advocated closer ties between the Jewish and Christian communities. He held that communication between Jews and Christians was not merely permissible, but "desirable and even essential" on non-theological issues such as war and peace, the war on poverty, the struggle for people to gain freedom, issues of morality and civil rights, and to work together against the perceived threat of secularism. As a result of his ruling, Orthodox Jewish groups did not operate in interfaith discussions between the [[Roman Catholic Church]] and Jews about [[Vatican II]], a strictly theological endeavour. However, the [[Rabbinical Council of America]] (RCA), with Soloveitchik's approval, then engaged in a number of interfaith dialogues with both Catholic and Protestant Christian groups. Soloveitchik understood his ruling as advising against purely theological interfaith dialogue, but as allowing theological dialogue as part of a greater context. [[Bernard Rosensweig]] (former President of the RCA) writes "The RCA remained loyal to the guidelines which the Rav [Soloveitch] had set down [concerning interfaith dialogue] and distinguished between theological discussions and ethical-secular concerns, which have universal validity. Every program involving either Catholic or Protestant churches in which we participated was carefully scrutinized.... Every topic which had possible theological nuances or implications was vetoed, and only when the Rav pronounced it to be satisfactory did we proceed to the dialogue." :An RCA committee was once reviewing possible topics for an inter-faith dialogue. One of the suggested topics was "Man in the Image of God." Several members of the committee felt that the topic had too theological a ring, and wished to veto it. When the Rav was consulted he approved the topic and quipped, "What should the topic have been? Man as a Naturalistic Creature?!" :(''Lawrence Kaplan, Revisionism and the Rav: The Struggle for the Soul of Modern Orthodoxy Judaism'', Summer, 1999) The basis for Soloveitchik's ruling was not narrowly legal, but sociological and historical. He described the traditional JewishโChristian relationship as one of "the few and weak vis-ร -vis the many and the strong", one in which the Christian community historically denied the right of the Jewish community to believe and live in their own way. His response was written in the light of past Jewish-Christian religious disputations, which traditionally had been forced upon the Jewish community. Those had as their express goal the conversion of Jews to Christianity. As recently as the 1960s many traditional Jews still looked upon all interfaith dialogue with suspicion, fearing that conversion may be an ulterior motive. This was a reasonable belief, given that many Catholics and most Protestants at the time in fact held this position. Reflecting this stance, Rabbi Soloveitchik asked the Christian community to respect "the right of the community of the few to live, create and worship in its own way, in freedom and with dignity." ====Other rabbinical views==== Many traditional rabbis agree; they hold that while cooperation with the Christian community is of importance, theological dialogue is unnecessary, or even misguided. Rabbi [[Eliezer Berkovits]] writes that "Judaism is Judaism because it rejects Christianity, and Christianity is Christianity because it rejects Judaism." (Disputation and Dialogue: Readings in the Jewish Christian Encounter, Ed. F.E. Talmage, Ktav, 1975, p. 291.) In later years Solovetichik's qualified permission was interpreted more and more restrictively. (Tradition:A Journal of Orthodox Thought, Vol. 6, 1964) Today many Orthodox rabbis use Soloveitchik's letter to justify having no discussion or joint efforts with Christians. In contrast, some Modern Orthodox rabbis such as [[Eugene Korn]] and [[David Hartman (rabbi)|David Hartman]] hold that in some cases, the primary issue in ''Confrontation'' is no longer valid; some Christian groups no longer attempt to use interfaith dialogue to convert Jews to Christianity. They believe that the relationship between Judaism and Christianity has reached a point where Jews can trust Christian groups to respect them as equals. Further, in most nations it is not possible for Jews to be forced or pressured to convert, and many major Christian groups no longer teach that the Jews who refuse to convert are [[Damnation#Religious|damned]] to [[hell]]. In non-Orthodox denominations of Judaism most rabbis hold that Jews have nothing to fear from engaging in theological dialogue, and may have much to gain. Some hold that in practice Soloveitchik's distinctions are not viable, for any group that has sustained discussion and participation on moral issues will implicitly involve theological discourse. Thus, since informal implicit theological dialogue will occur, one might as well admit it and publicly work on formal theological dialogue. ====Orthodox Rabbinic Statement on Christianity==== {{Main|To Do the Will of Our Father in Heaven: Toward a Partnership between Jews and Christians}} On December 3, 2015, the [[Center for Jewish-Christian Understanding and Cooperation]] (CJCUC) spearheaded a petition of orthodox rabbis from around the world calling for increased partnership between Jews and Christians.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/55561/groundbreaking-petition-signed-leading-rabbis-calls-increased-partnership-between-jews-christians-biblical-zionism/|title=Groundbreaking Petition Signed by Leading Rabbis Calls for Increased Partnership Between Jews and Christians|first= Adam Eliyahu|last=Berkowitz|publisher=Breaking Israel News|date=7 December 2015|access-date=29 October 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/national/modern-orthodox-leaders-bless-interfaith-dialogue|title=Modern Orthodox Leaders Bless Interfaith Dialogue|first=Steve|last=Lipman|publisher=[[The Jewish Week]]|date=8 December 2015|access-date=29 October 2016|archive-date=20 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160620040507/http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/national/modern-orthodox-leaders-bless-interfaith-dialogue|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.post-gazette.com/news/nation/2015/12/11/Vatican-Orthodox-rabbis-issue-interfaith-statements-affirming-each-other-s-faith/stories/201512110164|title=Vatican, Orthodox rabbis issue interfaith statements affirming each other's faith|first=Peter|last=Smith|publisher=[[Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]]|date=11 December 2015|access-date=29 October 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rabbi-shmuly-yanklowitz/towards-jewish-christian-reconciliation_b_9133926.html|title=Towards Jewish-Christian Reconciliation & Partnership|first=Rabbi Shmuly|last=Yanklowitz|publisher=[[Huffington Post]]|date=3 February 2016|access-date=29 October 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jpost.com/Blogs/Intellectual-Judaism/Mutual-Judeo-Christian-spiritual-foundation-of-Judaism-and-Christianity-444183|title=Mutual Judeo-Christian spiritual foundation of Judaism and Christianity|first=VLADIMIR|last=MINKOV|publisher=[[Jerusalem Post]]|date=7 February 2016|access-date=29 October 2016}}</ref><ref name="vaticanradio">{{cite web |url=http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2015/12/10/orthodox_rabbis_issue_groundbreaking_statement_on_christians/1193458|title=Orthodox Rabbis issue groundbreaking statement on Christianity|publisher=[[Vatican Radio]]|date=10 December 2015|access-date=29 October 2016}}</ref> The unprecedented [[Center for Jewish-Christian Understanding and Cooperation#Orthodox Rabbinic Statement on Christianity|Orthodox Rabbinic Statement on Christianity]], entitled ''"To Do the Will of Our Father in Heaven: Toward a Partnership between Jews and Christians"'', was initially signed by over 25 prominent Orthodox rabbis in Israel, United States and Europe<ref name="vaticanradio" /> and now has over 60 signatories.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://cjcuc.com/site/2015/12/03/orthodox-rabbinic-statement-on-christianity/|title=Orthodox Rabbinic Statement on Christianity - To Do the Will of Our Father in Heaven - Toward a Partnership between Jews and Christians|website=CJCUC|date=3 December 2015|access-date=29 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161016174221/http://cjcuc.com/site/2015/12/03/orthodox-rabbinic-statement-on-christianity/|archive-date=16 October 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> ====Between Jerusalem and Rome==== On August 31, 2017, representatives of the [[Conference of European Rabbis]], the [[Rabbinical Council of America]], and the Commission of the [[Chief Rabbinate of Israel]] issued and presented the [[Holy See]] with a statement entitled ''Between Jerusalem and Rome''. The document pays particular tribute to the Second Vatican Council's Declaration ''[[Nostra Aetate]]'', whose fourth chapter represents the [[Magna Charta]] of the Holy See's dialogue with the Jewish world. The Statement ''Between Jerusalem and Rome'' does not hide the theological differences that exist between the two faith traditions while all the same it expresses a firm resolve to collaborate more closely, now and in the future.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2017/august/documents/papa-francesco_20170831_delegazione-rabbini.html|title=ADDRESS OF HIS HOLINESS POPE FRANCIS TO THE DELEGATION OF RABBIS FOR THE PRESENTATION OF THE STATEMENT "BETWEEN JERUSALEM AND ROME"|date=31 August 2017|website=[[Vatican Publishing House|The Vatican]]|access-date=3 September 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jcrelations.net/Between_Jerusalem_and_Rome_-.5580.0.html?|title=Between Jerusalem and Rome - ืืื ืืคืจื ืืื ืืจืืฉืืื ืืจืืื|website=Jewish-Christian Relations|date=31 August 2017|access-date=3 September 2017}}</ref> ====Ground rules for a Christian-Jewish dialogue {{POV statement|date=January 2015}}==== Conservative Rabbi [[Robert Gordis]] wrote an essay on "Ground Rules for a Christian Jewish Dialogue"; in all Jewish denominations, one form or another of these rules eventually became more or less accepted by parties engaging in Jewish-Christian theological dialogue. Robert Gordis held that "a rational dialogue conducted on the basis of knowledge and mutual respect between the two components of the religio-ethical tradition of the Western world can prove a blessing to our age." His proposed ground rules for fair discussion are: :(1) People should not label Jews as worshiping an inferior "Old Testament God of Justice" while saying that Christians worship a superior "God of Love of the New Testament." Gordis gives quotations from the [[Tanakh]] (Hebrew Bible) which in his view prove that this view is a misleading caricature of both religions that was created by selective quotation. (See [[Marcion]] for the historical source of this interpretation). :(2) He holds that Christians should stop "the widespread practice of contrasting the primitivism, tribalism and formalism of the Old Testament (see also [[Antinomianism]]) with the spirituality, universalism, and freedom of the New, to the manifest disadvantage of the former." Gordis again brings forth quotations from the [[Tanakh]] which in his view prove that this is a misleading caricature of both religions, created by selective quotation. :(3) "Another practice which should be surrendered is that of referring to Old Testament verses quoted in the New as original New Testament passages. Many years ago, [[Bertrand Russell]], a well known atheist, described the [[Ethic of Reciprocity|Golden Rule]] 'Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself' as New Testament teaching. When the Old Testament source ({{bibleverse||Leviticus|19:18|HE}}, the [[Great Commandment]]) was called to his attention, he blandly refused to recognize his error." {{Citation needed|date=November 2010}} :(4) Christians need to understand that while Judaism is based on the [[Hebrew Bible]], it is not identical to the religion described in it. Rather, Judaism is based on the Bible as understood through the classical works of [[rabbinic literature]], such as the [[Mishnah]] and [[Talmud]]. Gordis writes "To describe Judaism within the framework of the Old Testament is as misleading as constructing a picture of American life in terms of the Constitution, which is, to be sure, the basic law of the land but far from coextensive with our present legal and social system." :(5) Jews must "rise above the heavy burden of historical memories which have made it difficult for them to achieve any real understanding, let alone an appreciation, of Christianity. It is not easy to wipe out the memories of centuries of [[persecution]] and [[wiktionary:massacre|massacre]], all too often dedicated to the advancement of the cause of the [[wikt:Prince of Peace|Prince of Peace]].....[It is] no easy task for Jews to divest themselves of the heavy burden of group memories from the past, which are unfortunately reinforced all too often by personal experiences in the present. Nevertheless, the effort must be made, if men are to emerge from the dark heritage of religious hatred which has embittered their mutual relationships for twenty centuries. There is need for Jews to surrender the stereotype of Christianity as being monolithic and unchanging and to recognize the ramifications of viewpoint and emphasis that constitute the multicolored spectrum of [[Christian denominations|contemporary Christianity]]." Gordis calls on Jews to "see in Christian doctrine an effort to apprehend the nature of the divine that is worthy of respect and understanding" and that "the dogmas of the Christian church have expressed this vision of God in terms that have proved meaningful to Christian believers through the centuries." He calls on Jews to understand with tolerance and respect the historical and religious context which led Christians to develop the concepts of the [[Virgin birth of Jesus|Virgin Birth]], the [[Incarnation]], [[Passion (Christianity)|the Passion]], and the [[Resurrection of Jesus|Resurrection]], even if Jews themselves do not accept these ideas as correct. Similarly, Gordis calls on Christians to understand with tolerance and respect that Jews do not accept these beliefs, since they are in contradiction to the Jewish understanding of the [[Shema Yisrael|unity of God]]. (Source: "The Root and the Branch", Chapter 4, Robert Gordis, Univ. of Chicago Press, 1962) Recently, over 120 rabbis have signed the [[Dabru Emet]] ("Speak the Truth"), a document concerning the relationship between Judaism and Christianity. While affirming that there are substantial theological differences between the two religions, the purpose of Dabru Emet is to point out common ground. It is not an official document of any of the Jewish denominations per se, but it is representative of what many Jews feel. Dabru Emet sparked a [[controversy]] in segments of the Jewish community. Many Jews disagree with parts of it for a variety of reasons. ===Views on Jewish-Muslim dialogue=== Many Muslim and Jewish groups and individuals have together created [[projects working for peace among Israelis and Arabs]], most of which have as one of their goals overcoming [[religious prejudice]]. The viewpoint of [[Conservative Judaism]] is summarized in ''Emet Ve-Emunah: Statement of Principles of Conservative Judaism''. This official statement holds that :"As Conservative Jews, we acknowledge without apology the many debts which Jewish religion and civilization owe to the nations of the world. We eschew triumphalism with respect to other ways of serving God. [[Maimonides]] believed that other monotheistic faiths, Christianity and Islam, serve to spread knowledge of, and devotion to, the God and the Torah of Israel throughout the world. Many modern thinkers, both Jewish and gentile, have noted that God may well have seen fit to enter covenants with many nations. Either outlook, when relating to others, is perfectly compatible with a commitment to one's own faith and pattern of religious life. If we criticize triumphalism in our own community, then real dialogue with other faith groups requires that we criticize triumphalism and other failings in those quarters as well. In the second half of the twentieth century, no relationship between Jews and Christians can be dignified or honest without facing up frankly to the centuries of prejudice, theological anathema, and persecution that have been thrust upon Jewish communities, culminating in the horrors of the Shoah ([[Holocaust]]). No relationship can be nurtured between Jews and Muslims unless it acknowledges explicitly and seeks to combat the terrible social and political effects of Muslim hostility, as well as the disturbing but growing reaction of Jewish anti-Arabism in the [[Land of Israel]]. But all of these relationships, properly pursued, can bring great blessing to the Jewish community and to the world. As the late Professor [[Abraham Joshua Heschel]] put it, "no religion is an island." ===Views on dialogue with other religions=== A small number of modern Jewish theologians, such as [[Yehezkel Kaufman]] and [[Rabbi]] Joseph H. Hertz, have suggested that perhaps only the Israelites were forbidden to worship idols, but perhaps such worship was permissible for members of other religions. (Yehezkel Kaufman, "The Religion of Israel", Univ. of Chicago Press, 1960; J. H. Hertz, "Pentateuch and Haftorahs" Soncino Press, 1960, p. 759). Most Jewish theologians disagree, saying that the original meaning of the text was to condemn idolatry in total. However, a growing number of Jewish theologians question whether [[Hindu]]s and [[Buddhist]]s today should be considered idolaters in the Biblical sense of the term. Their reasons are that modern day Buddhists, Hindus and others (a) do not literally worship "sticks and stones", as the idolaters in the Tanakh were described doing. They are well aware that icons they worship are only symbols of a deeper level of reality (though the same can be said of modern-day [[paganism|pagans]]), (b) they do not practice child sacrifice, (c) they are of high moral character, and (d) they are not anti-Jewish. Some Jews argue that God has a relationship with all gentile monotheists (or perceived monotheists), including Hindus, who in the past may have been (mis)interpreted as having a polytheist faith (see also [[Hindu views on monotheism]]), as well as with members of other religions such as [[Buddhism]]. ==Intra-religious pluralism== The article on [[Relationships between Jewish religious movements]] describes how the different Jewish denominations view each other and interact with each other. ==See also== *[[Religious antisemitism]] *[[Religious pluralism]] *[[Antisemitism in Christianity]] *[[Christianity and Judaism]] *[[ChristianโJewish reconciliation]] *[[Antisemitism in Islam]] *[[IslamicโJewish relations]] *[[Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement]] *[[Yahwism]] ==Notes== {{reflist}} ==References== *Alan Brill, ''Judaism and Other Religions: Models of Understanding'' Palgrave 2010. *Alan Brill, [https://www.amazon.com/Judaism-World-Religions-Encountering-Christianity/dp/0230103693 ''Judaism and World Religions''] Palgrave Macmillan 2012 *Hananya Goodman, ed. ''Between Jerusalem and Benares : Comparative Studies in Judaism and Hinduism''. Delhi, Sri Satguru Publications, 1997+ *Robert Gordis ''The Root and the Branch'', Chapter 4, Univ. of Chicago Press, 1962 *J. H. Hertz, ''Pentateuch and Haftorahs'' Soncino Press, 1960, p. 759 *Lawrence Kaplan ''Revisionism and the Rav: The Struggle for the Soul of Modern Orthodoxy Judaism'', Summer, 1999 *Jacob Katz, ''Exclusiveness and Tolerance'', Oxford Univ. Press, 1961, Ch.10 *Yehezkel Kaufman, ''The Religion of Israel'', Univ. of Chicago Press, 1960 *''Judaism and the Varieties of Idolatrous Experience'' Bary S. Kogan in ''Proceedings of the Academy for Jewish Philosophy'' Ed. David Novak and Norbert M. Samuelson, University Press of America, 1992 *Eugene Korn ''The Man of Faith and Interreligious Dialogue: Revisiting 'Confrontation' After Forty Years'' *D. Levene ''The Garden of Wisdom'', Columbia Univ. Press, 1907/1966 *National Jewish Scholars Project, ''Dabru Emet: A Jewish Statement on Christians and Christianity'' *''Emet Ve-Emunah: Statement of Principles of Conservative Judaism'', The Rabbinical Assembly, NY *Bernard Rosenzweig, ''The Rav as Communal Leader,'' Tradition 30.4, p. 214-215, 1996 *Joseph Soloveitchik ''Confrontation'' Tradition: A Journal of Orthodox Thought, 1964 volume 6, #2 *''Disputation and Dialogue: Readings in the Jewish Christian Encounter'', Ed. F.E. Talmage, Ktav, 1975, p. 291 *[http://www.js.emory.edu/BLUMENTHAL/JudaismandHinduism.html Emory University class: ''Introduction to Religion: Judaism and Hinduism''] * Martin Goodman, Joseph David, Corinna R. Kaiser, and Simon Levis Sullam, [http://www.littman.co.uk/cat/goodman-toleration.html ''Toleration within Judaism''] (Oxford, UK: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2013). ==External links== *[http://www.pluralism.org/religions/judaism/ The Pluralism Project: Judaism] [[Category:Judaism and society|Pluralism]] [[Category:Jews and Judaism and pluralism| ]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Ambox
(
edit
)
Template:Bibleverse
(
edit
)
Template:Citation needed
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Clarify
(
edit
)
Template:Cquote
(
edit
)
Template:Dubious
(
edit
)
Template:Em dash
(
edit
)
Template:Fix
(
edit
)
Template:Judaism
(
edit
)
Template:Main
(
edit
)
Template:More citations needed
(
edit
)
Template:POV
(
edit
)
Template:POV statement
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Script/Hebrew
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Vague
(
edit
)