Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Kleene fixed-point theorem
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Theorem in order theory and lattice theory}} {{otheruses4|Kleene's fixed-point theorem in lattice theory|the fixed-point theorem in computability theory|Kleene's recursion theorem}} [[File:Kleene fixpoint svg.svg|thumb|Computation of the least fixpoint of ''f''(''x'') = {{sfrac|1|10}}''x''<sup>2</sup>+[[arctangent|atan]](''x'')+1 using Kleene's theorem in the real [[interval (mathematics)|interval]] [0,7] with the usual order]] In the [[mathematics|mathematical]] areas of [[order theory|order]] and [[lattice theory]], the '''Kleene fixed-point theorem''', named after American mathematician [[Stephen Cole Kleene]], states the following: :'''Kleene Fixed-Point Theorem.''' Suppose <math>(L, \sqsubseteq)</math> is a [[complete partial order|directed-complete partial order]] (dcpo) with a least element, and let <math>f: L \to L</math> be a [[Scott continuity|Scott-continuous]] (and therefore [[monotone function|monotone]]) [[function (mathematics)|function]]. Then <math>f</math> has a [[least fixed point]], which is the [[supremum]] of the ascending Kleene chain of <math>f.</math> The '''ascending Kleene chain''' of ''f'' is the [[chain (order theory)|chain]] :<math>\bot \sqsubseteq f(\bot) \sqsubseteq f(f(\bot)) \sqsubseteq \cdots \sqsubseteq f^n(\bot) \sqsubseteq \cdots</math> obtained by [[iterated function|iterating]] ''f'' on the [[least element]] β₯ of ''L''. Expressed in a formula, the theorem states that :<math>\textrm{lfp}(f) = \sup \left(\left\{f^n(\bot) \mid n\in\mathbb{N}\right\}\right)</math> where <math>\textrm{lfp}</math> denotes the least fixed point. Although [[Tarski's fixed point theorem]] does not consider how fixed points can be computed by iterating ''f'' from some seed (also, it pertains to [[monotone function]]s on [[complete lattices]]), this result is often attributed to [[Alfred Tarski]] who proves it for additive functions.<ref>{{cite journal | author=Alfred Tarski | url=http://projecteuclid.org/Dienst/UI/1.0/Summarize/euclid.pjm/1103044538 | title=A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications | journal = [[Pacific Journal of Mathematics]] | volume=5 | year=1955 | issue=2 | pages=285–309| doi=10.2140/pjm.1955.5.285 }}, page 305.</ref> Moreover, the Kleene fixed-point theorem can be extended to [[monotone function]]s using transfinite iterations.<ref>{{cite journal | author=Patrick Cousot and Radhia Cousot | url=https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.pjm/1102785059 | title=Constructive versions of Tarski's fixed point theorems | journal = Pacific Journal of Mathematics | volume=82 | year=1979 | issue=1 | pages=43–57| doi=10.2140/pjm.1979.82.43 }}</ref> == Proof == Source:<ref>{{Cite book|title=Mathematical Theory of Domains by V. Stoltenberg-Hansen|last1=Stoltenberg-Hansen|first1=V.|last2=Lindstrom|first2=I.|last3=Griffor|first3=E. R.|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1994|isbn=0521383447|pages=[https://archive.org/details/mathematicaltheo0000stol/page/24 24]|language=en|doi=10.1017/cbo9781139166386|url=https://archive.org/details/mathematicaltheo0000stol/page/24}}</ref> We first have to show that the ascending Kleene chain of <math>f</math> exists in <math>L</math>. To show that, we prove the following: :'''Lemma.''' If <math>L</math> is a dcpo with a least element, and <math>f: L \to L</math> is Scott-continuous, then <math>f^n(\bot) \sqsubseteq f^{n+1}(\bot), n \in \mathbb{N}_0</math> :'''Proof.''' We use induction: :* Assume n = 0. Then <math>f^0(\bot) = \bot \sqsubseteq f^1(\bot),</math> since <math>\bot</math> is the least element. :* Assume n > 0. Then we have to show that <math>f^n(\bot) \sqsubseteq f^{n+1}(\bot)</math>. By rearranging we get <math>f(f^{n-1}(\bot)) \sqsubseteq f(f^n(\bot))</math>. By inductive assumption, we know that <math>f^{n-1}(\bot) \sqsubseteq f^n(\bot)</math> holds, and because f is monotone (property of Scott-continuous functions), the result holds as well. As a corollary of the Lemma we have the following directed Ο-chain: :<math>\mathbb{M} = \{ \bot, f(\bot), f(f(\bot)), \ldots\}.</math> From the definition of a dcpo it follows that <math>\mathbb{M}</math> has a supremum, call it <math>m.</math> What remains now is to show that <math>m</math> is the least fixed-point. First, we show that <math>m</math> is a fixed point, i.e. that <math>f(m) = m</math>. Because <math>f</math> is [[Scott continuity|Scott-continuous]], <math>f(\sup(\mathbb{M})) = \sup(f(\mathbb{M}))</math>, that is <math>f(m) = \sup(f(\mathbb{M}))</math>. Also, since <math>\mathbb{M} = f(\mathbb{M})\cup\{\bot\}</math> and because <math>\bot</math> has no influence in determining the supremum we have: <math>\sup(f(\mathbb{M})) = \sup(\mathbb{M})</math>. It follows that <math>f(m) = m</math>, making <math>m</math> a fixed-point of <math>f</math>. The proof that <math>m</math> is in fact the ''least'' fixed point can be done by showing that any element in <math>\mathbb{M}</math> is smaller than any fixed-point of <math>f</math> (because by property of [[supremum]], if all elements of a set <math>D \subseteq L</math> are smaller than an element of <math>L</math> then also <math>\sup(D)</math> is smaller than that same element of <math>L</math>). This is done by induction: Assume <math>k</math> is some fixed-point of <math>f</math>. We now prove by induction over <math>i</math> that <math>\forall i \in \mathbb{N}: f^i(\bot) \sqsubseteq k</math>. The base of the induction <math>(i = 0)</math> obviously holds: <math>f^0(\bot) = \bot \sqsubseteq k,</math> since <math>\bot</math> is the least element of <math>L</math>. As the induction hypothesis, we may assume that <math>f^i(\bot) \sqsubseteq k</math>. We now do the induction step: From the induction hypothesis and the monotonicity of <math>f</math> (again, implied by the Scott-continuity of <math>f</math>), we may conclude the following: <math>f^i(\bot) \sqsubseteq k ~\implies~ f^{i+1}(\bot) \sqsubseteq f(k).</math> Now, by the assumption that <math>k</math> is a fixed-point of <math>f,</math> we know that <math>f(k) = k,</math> and from that we get <math>f^{i+1}(\bot) \sqsubseteq k.</math> == See also == * Other [[fixed-point theorem]]s == References == {{Reflist}} [[Category:Order theory]] [[Category:Fixed-point theorems]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Otheruses4
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Sfrac
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)