Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Market portfolio
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
'''Market portfolio''' is an [[investment portfolio ]] that theoretically consisting of a [[weighted sum]] of every [[asset]] in the market, with weights in the proportions that they exist in the market, with the necessary assumption that these assets are [[infinitely divisible]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/market-portfolio.asp|title=Market Portfolio Definition|publisher=[[Investopedia]]}}</ref><ref>[http://pages.cs.brandeis.edu/~magnus/stocks/node7.html The Market Portfolio ]</ref> The concept is related to [[asset allocation]] and has been critiqued by some economists. In practice index providers and [[exchange-traded fund]]s (ETF) providers create proxies of a market portfolio using [[securities]] that are available on [[securities exchange]]s in proportion of their weighting. == Critiques == [[Richard Roll]]'s critique states that this is only a theoretical concept, as to create a market portfolio for investment purposes in practice would necessarily include every single possible available asset, including real estate, precious metals, stamp collections, jewelry, and anything with any worth, as the theoretical market being referred to would be the world market.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Roll |first=R. |year=1977 |title=A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory's Tests |journal=Journal of Financial Economics |volume=4 |issue= 2|pages=129β176 |doi=10.1016/0304-405X(77)90009-5 }}</ref> There is some question of whether what is used for the market portfolio really matters. Some authors say that it does not make a big difference; you can use any representative index and get similar results.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Stambaugh |first=Robert |year=1982 |title=On the exclusion of assets from tests of the two-parameter model: A sensitivity analysis |journal=Journal of Financial Economics |volume=10 |issue= 3|pages=237β268 |doi=10.1016/0304-405X(82)90002-2 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|year=1987| last1=Brown|first1=Keith|last2=Brown|first2=Gregory|title=Does the composition of the market portfolio really matter|journal=Journal of Portfolio Management|volume=13|issue=2|pages=26β32|doi=10.3905/jpm.1987.26| s2cid=155082786}}</ref> Roll gave an example where different indexes produce much different results, and that by choosing the index you can get any ranking you want. Brown and Brown (1987) examine this, using different indexes such as stocks only, stocks and bonds, and stocks plus bonds plus real estate. They find that using a market that includes real estate produces much different results. For example, with one measurement most mutual funds have alpha close to zero, while with another measurement most of them have significantly negative alpha. Most index providers give indices for different components such as stocks only, bonds only, et cetera. As a result, proxies for the market (such as the [[FTSE 100]] in the [[United Kingdom|UK]], [[DAX]] in Germany or the [[S&P 500]] in the US) are used in practice by investors. [[Roll's critique]] states that these proxies cannot provide an accurate representation of the entire market. The concept of a market portfolio plays an important role in many financial theories and models, including the [[capital asset pricing model]] where it is the only fund in which investors need to invest, to be supplemented only by a risk-free asset, depending upon each investor's attitude towards risk. [[William F. Sharpe|Sharpe]] (2010) notes that many investors are at least targeted to a fixed ratio (e.g. 60% stocks, 40% bonds). He points out that this is sort of contrarian. The holdings of all investors combined must, by equation, be in the cap-weighted proportions. So many investors following this strategy implies some other investors must follow a buy-high, sell-low (trend following) strategy. He then says that he doesn't like it and people should use adjustments to the market proportions instead.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Sharpe |first=William |year=2010 |title=Adaptive asset allocation policies |journal=Financial Analysts Journal |volume=66 |issue= 3|pages=45β59 |doi=10.2469/faj.v66.n3.3 |s2cid=155081123 }}</ref> The portfolio of the average investor contains important information for strategic asset allocation purposes. This portfolio shows the relative value of all assets according to the market crowd, which one could interpret as a benchmark for the average investor. Several authors have collected data to determine the composition of the global market portfolio since 1960.<ref>{{Cite journal|year=1985| last1=Ibbotson|first1=Roger|last2=Siegel|first2=Lawrence|last3=Love|first3=Kathryn|title=World wealth: Market values and returns|journal=Journal of Portfolio Management|volume=12|issue=1|pages=4β23|doi=10.3905/jpm.1985.409036| s2cid=154485834}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|year=2014|last1=Doeswijk|first1=Ronald|last2=Lam|first2=Trevin|last3=Swinkels|first3=Laurens|title=The global multi-asset market portfolio, 1960-2012|journal=Financial Analysts Journal|volume=70|issue=2|pages=26β41|doi=10.2469/faj.v70.n2.1|s2cid=704936 }}</ref> The returns on the market portfolio realizes a compounded real return of 4.43% with a standard deviation of 11.2% from 1960 until 2017. In the inflationary period from 1960 to 1979, the compounded real return of the GMP is 3.24%, while this is 6.01% in the disinflationary period from 1980 to 2017. The reward for the average investor is a compounded return of 3.39%-points above the risk-free rate.<ref>{{Cite journal|year=2019|last1=Doeswijk|first1=Ronald|last2=Lam|first2=Trevin|last3=Swinkels|first3=Laurens|title=Historical returns of the market portfolio|journal=Review of Asset Pricing Studies|volume=X|issue=X|pages=XX}}</ref> ==See also== *[[Asset allocation]] *[[Capital market line]] *[[Capital allocation line]] *[[Security market line]] *[[Security characteristic line]] ==References== {{Reflist}} ==External links== *[http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/Documents/areas/fac/finance/market_portfolio_efficient.pdf The Market Portfolio May be Mean-Variance Efficient After All] {{Financial risk}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Market Portfolio}} [[Category:Market risk]] [[Category:Investment]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Financial risk
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)