Editing Midlothian campaign

{{Short description|Famous political campaign}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}}
[[Image:GladstoneandRosebery.gif|thumb|right|300px|Photograph taken at [[Dalmeny House]] of the campaign's organizers in 1879. Included in the photograph are [[William Ewart Gladstone]] and his wife [[Catherine Gladstone|Catherine]] and daughter [[Mary Gladstone|Mary]], as well as the [[Archibald Primrose, 5th Earl of Rosebery|Earl of Rosebery]] (seated at front, facing right) and [[Hannah, Countess of Rosebery|his Countess]] and the Countess's cousin [[Ferdinand James von Rothschild|Baron Ferdinand de Rothschild]].]]

The '''Midlothian campaign''' of 1878–80 was a series of [[History of the foreign relations of the United Kingdom|foreign policy]] speeches given by [[William Ewart Gladstone|William Gladstone]], former leader of Britain's [[Liberal Party (UK)|Liberal Party]]. Organised by the [[Archibald Primrose, 5th Earl of Rosebery|Earl of Rosebery]] as a media event, it is often cited as the first modern [[political campaign]].<ref name=Wiesner2014>{{cite book|last1=Wiesner-Hanks|first1=Merry E.|author-link=Merry Wiesner-Hanks |last2=Evans|first2=Andrew D.|last3=Wheeler|first3=William Bruce|last4=Ruff|first4=Julius|title=Discovering the Western Past, Volume II: Since 1500|date=2014|publisher=Cengage Learning|isbn=978-1111837174|page=336|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bbwTCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT351}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Price|first1=Richard|title=British Society 1680-1880: Dynamism, Containment and Change|date=1999|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=9780521657013|page=289|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oqY4cFsaK7AC&pg=PA289|language=en}}</ref> It also set the stage for Gladstone's comeback as a politician. It takes its name from the [[Midlothian (UK Parliament constituency) (1708-1918)|Midlothian]] constituency in [[Scotland]] where Gladstone (who was of Scottish ancestry) successfully stood in the 1880 election.

Gladstone charged the [[Second Disraeli ministry|Conservative government]] of his longstanding political enemy [[Benjamin Disraeli]] with financial incompetence, neglect of domestic legislation, and mismanagement of foreign affairs. He was able to enhance his reputation as a popular and down-to-earth politician ("The People's William") and cemented his pre-eminence as the most important politician within the Liberal Party.

The Midlothian campaign made it impossible to ignore Gladstone's leadership claim both within the Liberal Party and for [[Queen Victoria]]. Furthermore, it created a momentum that carried the Liberals to power in the [[1880 United Kingdom general election|1880 election]].

==Gladstone's personal situation in the Mid-1870s==
[[File:Portrait of Hawarden 1877 William Gladstone (4672759) (cropped).jpg|thumb|Gladstone in 1877 at Hawarden]]
After six years of government, the Liberal government led by Prime Minister [[William Ewart Gladstone]] came to an end when the Liberals suffered a heavy defeat in the [[1874 United Kingdom general election|
general election of 1874]]. After a short transition period, Gladstone relinquished the leadership of the Liberal Party and subsequently became a mere backbencher in the British [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]]. Subsequently, he had to suffer a painful defeat when the [[Public Worship Regulation Act 1874]] was introduced as a [[Private Member's Bill]] by [[Archbishop of Canterbury]] [[Archibald Campbell Tait]], to limit what he perceived as the growing [[ritualism in the Church of England|ritualism]] of [[Anglo-Catholicism]] and the [[Oxford Movement]] within the [[Church of England]]. The bill was supported by [[Queen Victoria]] and Gladstone's longstanding political nemesis, Prime Minister [[Benjamin Disraeli]], who saw the bill purely in political terms.<ref>John Campbell: ''Pistols at Dawn: Two Hundred Years of Political Rivalry from Pitt and Fox to Blair and Brown.'' Vintage Books, London 2009, p.&nbsp;125.</ref> Gladstone, a [[high church]] Anglican whose sympathies were for [[separation of church and state]], felt disgusted that the [[liturgy]] was made, as he saw it, "a parliamentary football"<ref>{{cite book|last=Jenkins|first=Roy|author-link=Roy Jenkins|title=Gladstone|year=1995|publisher=Macmillan|location=London|isbn=0-333-60216-1|pages=383–384|chapter=22: Defeat and Retirement}}</ref> and introduced six resolutions when the bill came to the House of Commons. But on this he found himself out of step with his own party and had to back down when Disraeli put the weight of the government behind the bill.<ref>Richard Aldous: ''The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs Disraeli'' Pimlico, London 2007, p.&nbsp;257&nbsp;f.</ref> When the bill was passed, he retreated to his country mansion [[Hawarden Castle (18th century)|Hawarden Castle]]. In January 1875 he made good of his promise given years earlier and withdrew himself altogether from politics. Instead he spent his time at Hawarden with his studies of [[Homer]].<ref>John Campbell: ''Pistols at Dawn: Two Hundred Years of Political Rivalry from Pitt and Fox to Blair and Brown.'' Vintage Books, London 2009, p.&nbsp;125&nbsp;f.</ref> After his self-imposed exile, leadership of the Liberal party was shared by [[Spencer Cavendish, 8th Duke of Devonshire|Lord Hartington]], who led the Liberals in the House of Commons and [[Granville Leveson-Gower, 2nd Earl Granville|Lord Granville]], who was Leader of the Liberals in the [[House of Lords]].<ref>Richard Aldous: ''The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs Disraeli'' Pimlico, London 2007, p.&nbsp;260&nbsp;f.</ref> His biographers are in accordance that Gladstones self-imposed political exile was never complete and that he privately toyed with the idea of a political comeback as soon as there was an external cause for a reverse of his former decision.<ref>[[D. C. Somervell]]: ''Disraeli and Gladstone.'' Jarrolds Publishers, London 1925, p. 173 f.<br />[[Francis Birrell]]: ''Gladstone.'' Duckworth, London 1933, p. 89.<br />H. C. G Matthew: ''Gladstone: 1809–1898.'' London 1997, p. 256.<br />Richard Aldous: ''The Lion and the Unicorn. Gladstone vs Disraeli.'' Pimlico, London 2007, p. 260 f.<br />John Campbell: ''Pistols at Dawn: Two Hundred Years of Political Rivalry from Pitt and Fox to Blair and Brown.'' Vintage Books, London 2009, p. 126.</ref>

==The Bulgarian Uprising of 1876==
[[File:Konstantin Makovsky - The Bulgarian martyresses.jpg|thumb|Russian painting depicting the rape of Bulgarian women during the April Uprising]]
In 1875 the [[Eastern question]] came to the fore for the first time since the [[Crimean War]].<ref>Robert Blake: ''Disraeli'' Prion, London 1966, p.&nbsp;575.</ref> In July 1875 an [[Herzegovina uprising (1875–1877)|insurgency against Ottoman rule]] broke out in [[Herzegovina]], soon spreading over to Bosnia. Then at the end of April 1876 an insurgency had broken out in Bulgaria against Turkish rule. Military of the Ottoman Empire and [[Bashi-bazouk|irregular troops]] soon crushed the Bulgarian revolt, thereby committing brutal massacres and killing some 12,000 people.

To block Russia from filling the vacuum, Britain had strong ties with the crumbling Ottoman Empire, long branded as [[Sick man of Europe]]. For London, it was essential to support Ottoman Empire against further Russian expansion.<ref>John Campbell: ''Pistols at Dawn: Two Hundred Years of Political Rivalry from Pitt and Fox to Blair and Brown.'' Vintage Books, London 2009, p.&nbsp;126.</ref> This stemmed partly from British suspicions over Russian intentions towards India. In the 1860s a series of [[Russian conquest of Central Asia|Russian conquests in central Asia]] reinforced British concerns about Russia either marching to India direct or cutting the British rout to India. British politicians & diplomats feared that by taking Constantinople, Russia would have been able to threaten the Suez canal.<ref>Robert Blake: ''Disraeli'' Prion, London 1966, p.&nbsp;576 f.</ref> In the 1870s, there were voices that this dogma had in fact become obsolete. With the return of the conservatives to power in [[1874 United Kingdom general election|1874]], [[Benjamin Disraeli]] became prime minister. This forms a landmark in British foreign policy, as it ended a period of isolation and non-intervention. Since 1865 the policy of both parties had been to abstain from Continental affairs.<ref>R. W. Seton-Watson: ''Disraeli, Gladstone, and the Eastern Question: A Study in Diplomacy and Party Politics.'' W.W. Norton & Company, London 1972, p.&nbsp;3.</ref> From the beginning, Disraeli put his special attention to foreign policy and introduced an Imperial conception of affairs.<ref>R. W. Seton-Watson: ''Disraeli, Gladstone, and the Eastern Question: A Study in Diplomacy and Party Politics.'' W.W. Norton & Company, London 1972, p.&nbsp;3&nbsp;f.</ref> Disraeli also feared that by taking Constantinople, Russia could at any time march their Army through Syria to Egypt.<ref>Robert Blake: ''Disraeli'' Prion, London 1966, p.&nbsp;577.</ref> So for Britain, the "Key to India" remained in Constantinople.

==Extraparliamentary protest movements==
News of a series of atrocities by the [[Ottoman Turks|Ottomans]] during their suppression of the Bulgarian [[April Uprising]] reached the British press, despite the strong censorship of the Turkish authorities. In June the newspaper ''Daily News'', famous for its overseas coverage,<ref>R. W. Seton-Watson: ''Disraeli, Gladstone, and the Eastern Question: A Study in Diplomacy and Party Politics.'' W.W. Norton & Company, London 1972, p.&nbsp;52.</ref> published an account of atrocities committed by irregular troops and claimed that some twenty five thousand men, women and children had been slaughtered. The British public reaction was generally one of dismay, fuelled by various other public prints. Throughout the summer various other reports were published by the Daily News. Sir [[Henry Elliot]], British Ambassador at [[Constantinople]] since 1867, was strongly pro-Turk throughout his years in Constantinople. Additionally he suffered from poor health and was unable to pursue the allegations made of correspondents. All of this inclined Elliot to believe Turkish assurances. Although he was aware that the reports contained at least some truth, he toned down his reports to London.<ref>Robert Blake: ''Disraeli'' Prion, London 1966, p.&nbsp;592.</ref>
The [[Second Disraeli ministry|government of Benjamin Disraeli]] ignored the outrage at first and continued its policy of support for the [[Ottoman Empire]], an ally in the [[Crimean War]] and a bulwark against possible [[Russian Empire|Russian]] expansion in the area. Disraeli, who was pro-Turk himself, was instinctively sceptical about atricity stories published, a stance he already took during the [[Indian mutiny]] back in 1857/1858. Furthermore, the Daily News was a dinstinctly Liberal newspaper and very hostile to Disraeli personally.<ref>Robert Blake: ''Disraeli'' Prion, London 1966, p.&nbsp;594.</ref> All of this combined to cause him to shrug aside the matter when he was questioned in the House of Commons about the issue. When questioned first in June, he denounced the whole story as a set-up job by the Daily News "to create a cry against the Government".<ref>Richard Aldous: ''The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs Disraeli'' Pimlico, London 2007, p.&nbsp;269.</ref> A week later, he quoted from his official correspondence with Sir Henry Elliot. While he admitted that acts on both sides were equally atrocious, he defended the Turks, repeatedly requoting Elliot. In the interval between these discussions in the House of Commons Disraeli complained bitterly to his Foreign secretary [[Edward Stanley, 15th Earl of Derby|Lord Derby]] that the Foreign Office did not supply him with the necessary accurate information before so critical a debate.<ref>R. W. Seton-Watson: ''Disraeli, Gladstone, and the Eastern Question: A Study in Diplomacy and Party Politics.'' W.W. Norton & Company, London 1972, p.&nbsp;54.</ref> He also resisted calls for a full inquiry and dismissed the reports as little more than "coffee house babble".<ref>Richard Aldous: ''The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs Disraeli'' Pimlico, London 2007, p.&nbsp;269 f.</ref> In August a preliminary report from [[Walter Baring (diplomat)|Walter Baring]] arrived in London; Baring had been sent out by the British Government to investigate what was going on. The report left no doubt that a massacre had been occurred.<ref>Robert Blake: ''Disraeli'' Prion, London 1966, p.&nbsp;594.</ref> In his final speech in the House of Commons on the 11th of August, Disraeli was forced to admit the killing of twelve thousand Bulgarians; calling it a "horrible event", but contrasting it with the much to high figures published in the Daily News and reports of the depopulation of a province of almost four million inhabitants.<ref>Richard Aldous: ''The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs Disraeli'' Pimlico, London 2007, p.&nbsp;270.</ref> Afterwards, Disraeli admitted to Derby that the debate had been "very damaging" for the Government and once again criticising the incompetence of the Foreign Office, which had misled him initially. Both Robert Blake and R. W. Seton-Watson agree that Disraeli, already a Turcophile, with a lack of factual information had committed himself to a path from which it was difficult to recede from without admitting publicly that he had been wrong.<ref>R. W. Seton-Watson: ''Disraeli, Gladstone, and the Eastern Question: A Study in Diplomacy and Party Politics.'' W.W. Norton & Company, London 1972, p.&nbsp;56 f.<br />Robert Blake: ''Disraeli'' Prion, London 1966, p.&nbsp;592.</ref>

Throughout August more updates came in; the American consul [[Eugene Schuyler]], a much respeceted man, had been despatched from Constantinople to see for himself what was going on. He reported an "indiscriminate slaughter" and recounted that the Bashibazuks had locked prisoners in churches before setting fire on them. He also detailed the explicitly and religious nature of the violence. Official Turkish denials were dismissed by him as "a tissue of falsehoods". The Daily News immediately published Schuyler's reports. It caused a stir in Britain. Intellectuals and Clerics began to organise rallies and protests.
   
Gladstone took up the issue slowly, at first appearing uninterested. Young journalist [[W. T. Stead]] pressed Gladstone to join the protest. Gladstone felt uneasy, because liberal leader in the House of commons, Lord Hartington, was largely silent on the issue. By the end of August he made up his mind and, in the words of John Campbell, began a moral crusade. He wrote to Lord Granville: "Good ends in politics can rarely be achieved without passion; and there is now, for the first time in a good many years a virtous passion."<ref>John Campbell: ''Pistols at Dawn: Two Hundred Years of Political Rivalry from Pitt and Fox to Blair and Brown.'' Vintage Books, London 2009, p. 126.</ref> In four days he wrote a pamphlet which was published titled ''The Bulgarian Horrors and the Question of the East''. In Richard Aldous view, it was the single most influential work Gladstone ever wrote.<ref>Richard Aldous: ''The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs Disraeli'' Pimlico, London 2007, p.&nbsp;271.</ref> In four days alone, it sold over forty thousand copies and by the end of September, his pamphlet had been sold two hundred thousand copies.<ref>Richard Aldous: ''The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs Disraeli'' Pimlico, London 2007, p.&nbsp;272.</ref> Gladstone laid down three great aims: First he demanded to put an end ″to the anarchic misrule″. He further demanded administrative reform to prevent the ″recurrence of outrages″. Additionally he demanded to ″redeeem the honour of the British name″.<ref>R. W. Seton-Watson: ''Disraeli, Gladstone, and the Eastern Question: A Study in Diplomacy and Party Politics.'' W.W. Norton & Company, London 1972, p.&nbsp;75.</ref> He advocated concerted action of a United Europe which should pressure Turkey to acquiesce. Galdstoen also condemned Disraeli's policies and his pleas for the status quo.

During a mass rally in Blackheath he adressed a crowd of 10.000 people. Again, Gladstone advocated a coalition of the willing to put an end to Turkish tyranny.<ref>Richard Aldous: ''The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs Disraeli'' Pimlico, London 2007, p.&nbsp;272 ff.</ref> At a meeting at [[St James's Hall]], Gladstone once again condemned Disraeli. The meeting, which was presided by the Duke of Westminster and Lord Shaftesbury, was attended by [[Anthony Trollope]] and [[John Ruskin]]; letters of support from [[Thomas Carlyle]], [[Charles Darwin]] und [[Robert Browning]] were recited.

==The constituency of Midlothian==
By this point, Gladstone was already planning his return to full-time politics. At Hawarden Castle, he was analysing Liberal wins at several by-elections. Gladstone had never warmed to his current constituency in south-east London, feeling the constituency was too suburban, thereby lacking the industrial vigour of Lancashire and the glamour of his former Oxford University constituency. He was now in full search for a new constituency.<ref>Richard Aldous: ''The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs Disraeli'' Pimlico, London 2007, p.&nbsp;290&nbsp;f.</ref> After his announcement that he would not stand again in Grenwich, he also made clear that he was interested to receive offers from local Liberal organisations.<ref>Ian St John: ''Gladstone and the Logic of Victorian Politics.'' Anthem Press, London, 2010, p. 245.</ref> There were two offers before him; first up Leeds, a constituency with more than 50.000 voters and a Liberal stronghold.
[[File:Archibald-Philip-Primrose-5th-Earl-of-Rosebery.jpg|thumb|5th Earl of Rosebery]]

The other offer was the [[Midlothian (UK Parliament constituency, 1708–1918)|constituency of Edinburghshire, popularly known as Midlothian]], in Scotland. Created in 1708, the constituency of Midlothian was, compared to Leeds, just a tiny constituency with only 3620 voters. Nevertheless, Midlothian offered a sophisticated, metropolitan environment which were steeped in the tradition of the [[Scottish Enlightenment]]. Furthermore, it was a battleground for influence between two of the most powerful Scottish aristocratic families: The [[Duke of Buccleuch]] and the [[Earl of Rosebery]] were fighting for supremacy here since the 1860s.<ref>Richard Aldous: ''The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs Disraeli'' Pimlico, London 2007, p.&nbsp;291.</ref> In [[1868 United Kingdom general election|1868]] the long Conservative supremacy had come to an end when the Liberals sponsored by the Earl of Rosebery had won in Midlothian; in 1874 [[William Montagu Douglas Scott, 6th Duke of Buccleuch|Lord Dalkeith]] heir to the Duke of Buccleuch, had been able to win the seat back with a narrow majority for the Conservatives.<ref>Robert Blake: ''Disraeli'' Prion, London 1966, p.&nbsp;699.</ref> Nevertheless, Rosebery convinced Gladstone that Midlothian was an ideal place to start his campaign. In the past, Scotland had become a stronghold for Liberalism.<ref>Patrick Jackson: ''The Last of the Whigs: A Political Biography of Lord Hartington, Later Eight Duke of Devonshire.'' Associated University Presses, London 1994, p.&nbsp;98.</ref>

Rosebery who was one of the richest landowners and married to [[Hannah Primrose, Countess of Rosebery|Hannah de Rothschild]], promised Gladstone that he would pay up for all arising costs. Gladstone subsequently opted for Midlothian while Leeds fell to his son, [[Herbert Gladstone, 1st Viscount Gladstone|Herbert]].<ref>John Campbell: ''Pistols at Dawn: Two Hundred Years of Political Rivalry from Pitt and Fox to Blair and Brown.'' Vintage Books, London 2009, p.&nbsp;134.<br /Roy Jenkins: ''Gladstone: A Biography.'' Macmillan, London 1995, p.&nbsp;416.</ref>
Rosebery became Gladstone's campaign manager.

==The campaign==
By 1880, Gladstone's dogged focus on the issue had dragged it to the forefront of public attention, and in the [[1880 United Kingdom general election|general election of 1880]], Gladstone toured a series of cities giving speeches of up to five hours on the subject. The nature of his orations has often been compared to that of sermons, and his fiery, emotive, but logically structured speeches are credited with swaying a large number of undecided voters to the Liberals in the 1880s, and ousting Disraeli's last [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative]] government.

Equally important to the large scale of attendance at these meetings (several thousand came to each, and given the relatively narrow scale of the [[Suffrage|franchise]], this meant Gladstone could address a large proportion of electors in each district) was the widespread reporting of Gladstone's speeches and the public reaction to them. Paul Brighton argues that it was a highly successful media event:
:What was new about Midlothian was not that Gladstone spoke from the platform. This was already common-place for many front-rank politicians. It was the fact that the campaign was effectively designed as a media event, with specific attention to the deadlines and operational requirements of the [[journalist]]s covering it and crafted for maximum impact in the morning and evening [[newspaper|paper]]s.<ref>{{cite book|author=Paul Brighton|title=Original Spin: Downing Street and the Press in Victorian Britain|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PGKJDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT208|year=2015|publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing|page=204|isbn=9780857728142}}</ref>

==Content==
Gladstone's speeches covered the entire range of national policy, he gave his large audiences an advanced course in the principles of government that was both magisterial and exciting. The major speeches constitute a statement of the Liberal philosophy of government, reinforced by the fervour of his own deeply-held [[Anglicanism|Anglican]] faith. Scotland, at this time, was a nation fixated on the promotion of this sort of religious and moral rectitude and probity. His focus was usually on foreign affairs. Gladstone presented his commitment to a world community, governed by law, protecting the weak. His vision of the ideal world order combined universalism and inclusiveness; he appealed to group feeling, the sense of concern for others, rising eventually to the larger picture of the unity of mankind.<ref>Robert Kelley, "Midlothian: A Study In Politics and Ideas," ''Victorian Studies'' (1960) 4#2 pp 119-140.</ref>

==See also==
* [[Tulchan]]
*[[American election campaigns in the 19th century]], for contemporary campaigns

==References==
<references/>

==Bibliography==
* Aldous, Richard. ''The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs Disraeli'' Pimlico, London (2007).
* {{cite book |last= Blake |first= Robert |author-link=Robert Blake, Baron Blake |title= Disraeli |url= https://archive.org/details/disraeli00blak |url-access= registration |year=1967|orig-year=1966| publisher=St Martin's Press |location= New York|oclc= 400326}}
* {{citation |first=John |last=Campbell |title=Pistols at Dawn: Two Hundred Years of Political Rivalry from Pitt and Fox to Blair and Brown. |publisher=Vintage Books |location=London |date=2009 |isbn=978-1-84595-091-0 |chapter=Benjamin Disraeli and William Gladstone |pages= 90–140}}
* Jenkins, Roy. ''Gladstone'' (1997) pp 399–415
* Kelley, Robert. "Midlothian: A Study In Politics and Ideas," ''Victorian Studies'' (1960) 4#2 pp 119–140. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3825385 online]
* Matthew, H. C. G ''Gladstone: 1809-1898'' (1997) pp 293–313
* {{citation |first=R. W. |last=Seton-Watson |title=Disraeli, Gladstone, and the Eastern Question: A Study in Diplomacy and Party Politics.. |publisher=W.W. Norton & Company |location=London |date=1972 |isbn= 978-0-393-00594-3 }}

===Further reading===
* Blair, Kirstie. "The People’s William and the People’s Poets: William Gladstone and the Midlothian Campaign." ''The People’s Voice'' (2018) [https://thepeoplesvoice.glasgow.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Blair.pdf online].
* Brooks, David. "Gladstone and Midlothian: The Background to the First Campaign," ''Scottish Historical Review'' (1985) 64#1 pp 42–67. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/25530111 online]
* Brown, Stewart J. “‘Echoes of Midlothian’: Scottish Liberalism and the South African War, 1899–1902.” ''Scottish Historical Review'' 71#191/192, (1992), pp. 156–83, [http://www.jstor.org/stable/25530538 online].
* Fitzsimons, M. A. "Midlothian: the Triumph and Frustration of the British Liberal Party," ''Review of Politics'' (1960) 22#2 pp 187–201. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1405317 in JSTOR]
* Whitehead, Cameron Ean Alfred. "The Bulgarian Horrors: culture and the international history of the Great Eastern Crisis, 1876-1878" (PhD. Dissertation, University of British Columbia, 2014) [https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/pdf/24/1.0167317/1 online]
* Yildizeli, Fahriye Begum. "W.E. Gladstone and British Policy Towards the Ottoman Empire." (PhD dissertation, University of Exeter, 2016) [https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/25455/YildizeliF.pdf?sequence=1 online].

===Primary sources===
* Gladstone, W.E. ''Midlothian Speeches. 1879'' (Leicester University Press, 1971).
* Gladstone, William E. ''Midlothian Speeches 1884'' with an Introduction by M. R. D. Foot, (New York: Humanities Press, 1971) [https://archive.org/details/thirdmidlothianc00glad/page/n2/mode/2up online]

==External links==
*[http://www.channel4.com/history/microsites/H/history/guide19/timeline78.html Time Traveller's Guide to Victorian Britain: Midlothian campaign]

[[Category:Political campaigns in the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:History of Midlothian]]
[[Category:19th century in the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:William Ewart Gladstone]]
[[Category:1870s speeches]]
[[Category:1880s speeches]]