Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Molecular orbital theory
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Method for describing the electronic structure of molecules using quantum mechanics}} {{See also|Molecular orbital}} {{Use American English|date=February 2019}} {{Electronic structure methods}} In [[chemistry]], '''molecular orbital theory''' (MO theory or MOT) is a method for describing the electronic structure of molecules using [[quantum mechanics]]. It was proposed early in the 20th century. The MOT explains the [[paramagnetic]] nature of [[Allotropes of oxygen#Dioxygen|O<sub>2</sub>]], which [[valence bond theory]] cannot explain. In molecular orbital theory, [[electron]]s in a molecule are not assigned to individual [[chemical bond]]s between [[atom]]s, but are treated as moving under the influence of the [[Atomic nucleus|atomic nuclei]] in the whole molecule.<ref>{{cite book |author=Daintith, J. |title=Oxford Dictionary of Chemistry |location=New York |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-19-860918-6}}</ref> Quantum mechanics describes the spatial and energetic properties of electrons as molecular orbitals that surround two or more atoms in a molecule and contain [[valence electron]]s between atoms. Molecular orbital theory revolutionized the study of chemical bonding by approximating the states of bonded electrons – the molecular orbitals – as [[linear combination of atomic orbitals|linear combinations of atomic orbitals]] (LCAO). These approximations are made by applying the [[density functional theory]] (DFT) or [[Hartree–Fock method|Hartree–Fock]] (HF) models to the [[Schrödinger equation]]. Molecular orbital theory and [[valence bond theory]] are the foundational theories of [[quantum chemistry]]. ==Linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) method== In the [[LCAO]] method, each molecule has a set of [[molecular orbital]]s. It is assumed that the molecular orbital [[wave function]] ''ψ<sub>j</sub>'' can be written as a simple weighted sum of the ''n'' constituent [[atomic orbital]]s ''χ<sub>i</sub>'', according to the following equation:<ref>{{cite book |author=Licker, Mark J. |title=McGraw-Hill Concise Encyclopedia of Chemistry |location=New York |publisher=McGraw-Hill |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-07-143953-4}}</ref> <math display="block"> \psi_j = \sum_{i=1}^{n} c_{ij} \chi_i.</math> One may determine ''c<sub>ij</sub>'' coefficients numerically by substituting this equation into the [[Schrödinger equation]] and applying the [[variational principle]]. The variational principle is a mathematical technique used in quantum mechanics to build up the coefficients of each atomic orbital basis. A larger coefficient means that the orbital basis is composed more of that particular contributing atomic orbital – hence, the molecular orbital is best characterized by that type. This method of quantifying orbital contribution as a [[linear combination of atomic orbitals]] is used in [[computational chemistry]]. An additional [[unitary transformation]] can be applied on the system to accelerate the convergence in some computational schemes. Molecular orbital theory was seen as a competitor to [[valence bond theory]] in the 1930s, before it was realized that the two methods are closely related and that when extended they become equivalent. Molecular orbital theory is used to interpret [[ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy]] (UV–VIS). Changes to the electronic structure of molecules can be seen by the absorbance of light at specific wavelengths. Assignments can be made to these signals indicated by the transition of electrons moving from one orbital at a lower energy to a higher energy orbital. The molecular orbital diagram for the final state describes the electronic nature of the molecule in an excited state. There are three main requirements for atomic orbital combinations to be suitable as approximate molecular orbitals. # The atomic orbital combination must have the correct symmetry, which means that it must belong to the correct [[irreducible representation]] of the [[molecular symmetry|molecular symmetry group]]. Using [[linear combination of atomic orbitals|symmetry adapted linear combinations]], or SALCs, molecular orbitals of the correct symmetry can be formed. # Atomic orbitals must also overlap within space. They cannot combine to form molecular orbitals if they are too far away from one another. # Atomic orbitals must be at similar energy levels to combine as molecular orbitals. Because if the energy difference is great, when the molecular orbitals form, the change in energy becomes small. Consequently, there is not enough reduction in energy of electrons to make significant bonding.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Miessler |first1=Gary L. |title=Inorganic Chemistry |last2=Fischer |first2=Paul J. |last3=Tarr |first3=Donald A. |date=2013-04-08 |publisher=Pearson Education |isbn=978-0-321-91779-9 |language=en |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VSktAAAAQBAJ}}</ref> ==History== Molecular orbital theory was developed in the years after [[valence bond theory]] had been established (1927), primarily through the efforts of [[Friedrich Hund]], [[Robert Mulliken]], [[John C. Slater]], and [[John Lennard-Jones]].<ref>{{cite book |last=Coulson |first=Charles A. |title=Valence |publisher=Oxford at the Clarendon Press |year=1952}}</ref> MO theory was originally called the Hund-Mulliken theory.<ref name="Mulliken" >{{cite press release |orig-year=1966 |year=1972 |author=Mulliken, Robert S. |title=Spectroscopy, Molecular Orbitals, and Chemical Bonding |series=Nobel Lectures, Chemistry 1963–1970 |publisher=Elsevier Publishing Company |location=Amsterdam |url=http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1966/mulliken-lecture.pdf}}</ref> According to physicist and physical chemist [[Erich Hückel]], the first quantitative use of molecular orbital theory was the 1929 paper of [[John Lennard-Jones|Lennard-Jones]].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Hückel |first=Erich |year=1934 |journal=Trans. Faraday Soc. |volume=30 |doi=10.1039/TF9343000040 |title=Theory of free radicals of organic chemistry |pages=40–52}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Lennard-Jones |first=J.E. |year=1929 |journal=Trans. Faraday Soc. |volume=25 |doi=10.1039/TF9292500668 |title=The electronic structure of some diatomic molecules |pages=668–686 |bibcode=1929FaTr...25..668L}}</ref> This paper predicted a [[triplet state|triplet]] ground state for the [[dioxygen molecule]] which explained its [[paramagnetism]]<ref>Coulson, C.A. ''Valence'' (2nd ed., Oxford University Press 1961), p.103</ref> (see {{section link|Molecular orbital diagram|Dioxygen}}) before valence bond theory, which came up with its own explanation in 1931.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Pauling |first=Linus |year=1931 |journal=J. Am. Chem. Soc. |volume=53 |issue=9 |doi=10.1021/ja01360a004 |title=The Nature of the Chemical Bond. II. The One-Electron Bond and the Three-Electron Bond. |pages=3225–3237}}</ref> The word ''orbital'' was introduced by Mulliken in 1932.<ref name="Mulliken"/> By 1933, the molecular orbital theory had been accepted as a valid and useful theory.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The Lennard-Jones paper of 1929 and the foundations of Molecular Orbital Theory |last=Hall |first=George G. |journal=Advances in Quantum Chemistry |volume=22 |pages=1–6 |issn=0065-3276 |isbn=978-0-12-034822-0 |doi=10.1016/S0065-3276(08)60361-5 |bibcode=1991AdQC...22....1H |year=1991 |url=http://www.quantum-chemistry-history.com/LeJo_Dat/LJ-Hall1.htm|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Erich Hückel applied molecular orbital theory to unsaturated hydrocarbon molecules starting in 1931 with his [[Hückel method|Hückel molecular orbital (HMO) method]] for the determination of MO energies for [[pi electrons]], which he applied to conjugated and aromatic hydrocarbons.<ref>E. Hückel, ''[[Zeitschrift für Physik]]'', '''70''', 204 (1931); '''72''', 310 (1931); '''76''', 628 (1932); '''83''', 632 (1933).</ref><ref>''Hückel Theory for Organic Chemists'', [[Charles A. Coulson|C. A. Coulson]], B. O'Leary and R. B. Mallion, Academic Press, 1978.</ref> This method provided an explanation of the stability of molecules with six pi-electrons such as [[benzene]]. The first accurate calculation of a molecular orbital wavefunction was that made by [[Charles Coulson]] in 1938 on the hydrogen molecule.<ref>{{citation |last=Coulson |first=C.A. |author-link=Charles Coulson |title=Self-consistent field for molecular hydrogen |journal=[[Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society]] |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=204–212 |year=1938 |doi=10.1017/S0305004100020089 |bibcode=1938PCPS...34..204C |s2cid=95772081}}</ref> By 1950, molecular orbitals were completely defined as [[eigenfunctions]] (wave functions) of the self-consistent field [[Hamiltonian (quantum mechanics)|Hamiltonian]] and it was at this point that molecular orbital theory became fully rigorous and consistent.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1098/rspa.1950.0104 |last=Hall |first=G.G. |journal=Proc. R. Soc. A |volume=202 |pages=336–344 |issue=1070 |title=The Molecular Orbital Theory of Chemical Valency. VI. Properties of Equivalent Orbitals |date=7 August 1950 |bibcode=1950RSPSA.202..336H |s2cid=123260646}}</ref> This rigorous approach is known as the [[Hartree–Fock method]] for molecules although it had its origins in calculations on atoms. In calculations on molecules, the molecular orbitals are expanded in terms of an atomic orbital [[basis set (chemistry)|basis set]], leading to the [[Roothaan equations]].<ref name="Frank">{{cite book |last=Jensen |first=Frank |title=Introduction to Computational Chemistry |publisher=John Wiley and Sons |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-471-98425-2}}</ref> This led to the development of many [[ab initio quantum chemistry methods]]. In parallel, molecular orbital theory was applied in a more approximate manner using some empirically derived parameters in methods now known as [[semi-empirical quantum chemistry methods]].<ref name="Frank"/> The success of Molecular Orbital Theory also spawned [[ligand field theory]], which was developed during the 1930s and 1940s as an alternative to [[crystal field theory]]. ==Types of orbitals== [[File:MO diagram dihydrogen.png|thumb|right|300px|MO diagram showing the formation of molecular orbitals of H<sub>2</sub> (centre) from atomic orbitals of two H atoms. The lower-energy MO is bonding with electron density concentrated between the two H nuclei. The higher-energy MO is anti-bonding with electron density concentrated behind each H nucleus.]] Molecular orbital (MO) theory uses a [[linear combination of atomic orbitals]] (LCAO) to represent molecular orbitals resulting from bonds between atoms. These are often divided into three types, [[bonding molecular orbital|bonding]], [[antibonding molecular orbital|antibonding]], and [[non-bonding orbital|non-bonding]]. A bonding orbital concentrates electron density in the region ''between'' a given pair of atoms, so that its electron density will tend to attract each of the two nuclei toward the other and hold the two atoms together.<ref name="Tarr 2013">Miessler and Tarr (2013), ''Inorganic Chemistry'', 5th ed, 117-165, 475-534.</ref> An anti-bonding orbital concentrates electron density "behind" each nucleus (i.e. on the side of each atom which is farthest from the other atom), and so tends to pull each of the two nuclei away from the other and actually weaken the bond between the two nuclei. Electrons in non-bonding orbitals tend to be associated with atomic orbitals that do not interact positively or negatively with one another, and electrons in these orbitals neither contribute to nor detract from bond strength.<ref name="Tarr 2013"/> Molecular orbitals are further divided according to the types of [[atomic orbital]]s they are formed from. Chemical substances will form bonding interactions if their orbitals become lower in energy when they interact with each other. Different bonding orbitals are distinguished that differ by [[electron configuration]] (electron cloud shape) and by [[energy level]]s. The molecular orbitals of a molecule can be illustrated in [[molecular orbital diagram]]s. Common bonding orbitals are [[Sigma bond|sigma (σ) orbitals]] which are symmetric about the bond axis and [[pi bond|pi (π) orbitals]] with a [[Node (physics)|nodal plane]] along the bond axis. Less common are [[delta bond|delta (δ) orbitals]] and [[Phi bond|phi (φ) orbitals]] with two and three nodal planes respectively along the bond axis. Antibonding orbitals are signified by the addition of an asterisk. For example, an antibonding pi orbital may be shown as π*. ==Bond order== [[File:Molecular orbital diagram of He2.png|thumb|Molecular orbital diagram of He<sub>2</sub>]] Bond order is the number of chemical bonds between a pair of atoms. The bond order of a molecule can be calculated by subtracting the number of electrons in [[Antibonding molecular orbital|anti-bonding]] orbitals from the number of [[bonding molecular orbital|bonding]] orbitals, and the resulting number is then divided by two. A molecule is expected to be stable if it has bond order larger than zero. It is adequate to consider the [[valence electron]] to determine the bond order. Because (for [[principal quantum number]] ''n'' > 1) when MOs are derived from 1s AOs, the difference in number of electrons in bonding and anti-bonding molecular orbital is zero. So, there is no net effect on bond order if the electron is not the valence one. <math>\text{Bond order} = \frac12 (\text{Number of electrons in bonding MO} - \text{Number of electrons in anti-bonding MO})</math> From bond order, one can predict whether a bond between two atoms will form or not. For example, the existence of He<sub>2</sub> molecule. From the molecular orbital diagram, the bond order is <math display=inline>\frac12(2-2)=0</math>. That means, no bond formation will occur between two He atoms which is seen experimentally. It can be detected under very low temperature and pressure molecular beam and has [[binding energy]] of approximately 0.001 J/mol.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Miessler |first1=Gary L. |title=Inorganic Chemistry |last2=Fischer |first2=Paul J. |last3=Tarr |first3=Donald A. |date=2013-04-08 |publisher=Pearson Education |isbn=978-0-321-91779-9 |language=en |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VSktAAAAQBAJ}}</ref> (The [[helium dimer]] is a [[van der Waals molecule]].) Besides, the strength of a bond can also be realized from bond order (BO). For example: For H<sub>2</sub>: Bond order is <math display=inline>\frac12(2-0)=1</math>; bond energy is 436 kJ/mol. For H<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup>: Bond order is <math display=inline>\frac12(1-0)=\frac12</math>; bond energy is 171 kJ/mol. As the bond order of H<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> is smaller than H<sub>2</sub>, it should be less stable which is observed experimentally and can be seen from the bond energy. == Magnetism explained by molecular orbital theory == For almost every covalent molecule that exists, we can now draw the Lewis structure, predict the electron-pair geometry, predict the molecular geometry, and come close to predicting bond angles. However, one of the most important molecules we know, the oxygen molecule O<sub>2</sub>, presents a problem with respect to its Lewis structure. [[File:Ossigeno molecolare con elettroni liberi.png|thumb|192x192px|In O₂, each oxygen atom forms a double bond and retains two lone pairs to achieve a full octet, as shown in the Lewis structure.]] The electronic structure of O<sub>2</sub> adheres to all the rules governing Lewis theory. There is an O=O double bond, and each oxygen atom has eight electrons around it. However, this picture is at odds with the magnetic behavior of oxygen. By itself, O<sub>2</sub> is not magnetic, but it is attracted to magnetic fields. Thus, when we pour liquid oxygen past a strong magnet, it collects between the poles of the magnet and defies gravity. Such attraction to a magnetic field is called '''paramagnetism''', and it arises in molecules that have unpaired electrons. And yet, the Lewis structure of O<sub>2</sub> indicates that all electrons are paired. How do we account for this discrepancy? Molecular orbital diagram of oxygen molecule: [[File:Oxygen molecule orbitals diagram-en.svg|thumb|Molecular Orbital Energy-Level Diagrams for O2.]] Atomic number of oxygen – 8 Electronic configuration – 1s²2s²2p<sup>4</sup> Electronic configuration of oxygen molecule; ó1s² < *ó1s² < ó2s² < *ó2s² , [ π2px² = π2py²] < ó 2pz² < [*π2px¹ =*π2py¹] < *ó2pz Bond order of O<sub>2</sub> = (Bonding electrons − Anti bonding electrons) / 2 = (10 − 6) / 2 = 2 O<sub>2</sub> has unpaired electrons, hence it is paramagnetic.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Explain the Formation of O2 Molecule Using Molecular Orbital Theory |url=https://unacademy.com/content/question-answer/chemistry/explain-the-formation-of-o2-molecule-using-molecular-orbital-theory/ |access-date=2025-04-25 |website=Unacademy |language=en-US}}</ref> Magnetic susceptibility measures the force experienced by a substance in a magnetic field. When we compare the weight of a sample to the weight measured in a magnetic field, paramagnetic samples that are attracted to the magnet will appear heavier because of the force exerted by the magnetic field. We can calculate the number of unpaired electrons based on the increase in weight. Experiments show that each O<sub>2</sub> molecule has two unpaired electrons. The Lewis-structure model does not predict the presence of these two unpaired electrons. Unlike oxygen, the apparent weight of most molecules decreases slightly in the presence of an inhomogeneous magnetic field. Materials in which all of the electrons are paired are '''diamagnetic''' and weakly repel a magnetic field. Paramagnetic and diamagnetic materials do not act as permanent magnets. Only in the presence of an applied magnetic field do they demonstrate attraction or repulsion. Water, like most molecules, contains all paired electrons. Living things contain a large percentage of water, so they demonstrate diamagnetic behavior. If you place a frog near a sufficiently large magnet, it will levitate.<ref>{{cite web |year=2011 |title=The Real Levitation |website=High Field Laboratory |publisher=[[Radboud University Nijmegen]] |url=http://www.ru.nl/hfml/research/levitation/diamagnetic/ |access-date=26 September 2011 |archive-date=27 August 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827232750/http://www.ru.nl/hfml/research/levitation/diamagnetic/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> Molecular orbital theory (MO theory) provides an explanation of chemical bonding that accounts for the paramagnetism of the oxygen molecule. It also explains the bonding in a number of other molecules, such as violations of the octet rule and more molecules with more complicated bonding (beyond the scope of this text) that are difficult to describe with Lewis structures. Additionally, it provides a model for describing the energies of electrons in a molecule and the probable location of these electrons. Unlike valence bond theory, which uses hybrid orbitals that are assigned to one specific atom, MO theory uses the combination of atomic orbitals to yield molecular orbitals that are ''delocalized'' over the entire molecule rather than being localized on its constituent atoms. MO theory also helps us understand why some substances are electrical conductors, others are semiconductors, and still others are insulators. Molecular orbital theory describes the distribution of electrons in molecules in much the same way that the distribution of electrons in atoms is described using atomic orbitals. Using quantum mechanics, the behavior of an electron in a molecule is still described by a wave function, ''Ψ'', analogous to the behavior in an atom. Just like electrons around isolated atoms, electrons around atoms in molecules are limited to discrete (quantized) energies. The region of space in which a valence electron in a molecule is likely to be found is called a '''molecular orbital (''Ψ''<sup>2</sup>)'''. Like an atomic orbital, a molecular orbital is full when it contains two electrons with opposite spin.<ref>{{Cite web |title=4.3 Molecular Orbital Theory |url=https://chem-textbook.ucalgary.ca/version2/chapter-8-main/molecular-orbital-theory/ |access-date=2025-04-25 |website=UCalgary Chemistry Textbook |language=en-US}}</ref> ==Overview== {{More citations needed section|date=September 2020}} MOT provides a global, delocalized perspective on [[chemical bonding]]. In MO theory, ''any'' electron in a molecule may be found ''anywhere'' in the molecule, since quantum conditions allow electrons to travel under the influence of an arbitrarily large number of nuclei, as long as they are in eigenstates permitted by certain quantum rules. Thus, when excited with the requisite amount of energy through high-frequency light or other means, electrons can transition to higher-energy molecular orbitals. For instance, in the simple case of a hydrogen diatomic molecule, promotion of a single electron from a bonding orbital to an antibonding orbital can occur under UV radiation. This promotion weakens the bond between the two hydrogen atoms and can lead to photodissociation, the breaking of a chemical bond due to the absorption of light. Molecular orbital theory is used to interpret [[ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy]] (UV–VIS). Changes to the electronic structure of molecules can be seen by the absorbance of light at specific wavelengths. Assignments can be made to these signals indicated by the transition of electrons moving from one orbital at a lower energy to a higher energy orbital. The molecular orbital diagram for the final state describes the electronic nature of the molecule in an excited state. Although in MO theory ''some'' molecular orbitals may hold electrons that are more localized between specific pairs of molecular atoms, ''other'' orbitals may hold electrons that are spread more uniformly over the molecule. Thus, overall, bonding is far more delocalized in MO theory, which makes it more applicable to resonant molecules that have equivalent non-integer bond orders than [[valence bond theory]]. This makes MO theory more useful for the description of extended systems. [[Robert S. Mulliken]], who actively participated in the advent of molecular orbital theory, considers each molecule to be a self-sufficient unit. He asserts in his article: <blockquote>...Attempts to regard a molecule as consisting of specific atomic or ionic units held together by discrete numbers of bonding electrons or electron-pairs are considered as more or less meaningless, except as an approximation in special cases, or as a method of calculation […]. A molecule is here regarded as a set of nuclei, around each of which is grouped an electron configuration closely similar to that of a free atom in an external field, except that the outer parts of the electron configurations surrounding each nucleus usually belong, in part, jointly to two or more nuclei....<ref>{{cite journal |last=Mulliken |first=R. S. |title=Electronic Population Analysis on LCAO–MO Molecular Wave Functions. I |date=October 1955 |journal=The Journal of Chemical Physics |volume=23 |issue=10 |pages=1833–1840 |doi=10.1063/1.1740588 |bibcode=1955JChPh..23.1833M |issn=0021-9606 |url=https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-abstract/23/10/1833/76789/Electronic-Population-Analysis-on-LCAO-MO|url-access=subscription }}</ref></blockquote>An example is the MO description of [[benzene]], {{chem|C|6|H|6}}, which is an aromatic hexagonal ring of six carbon atoms and three double bonds. In this molecule, 24 of the 30 total valence bonding electrons – 24 coming from carbon atoms and 6 coming from hydrogen atoms – are located in 12 σ (sigma) bonding orbitals, which are located mostly between pairs of atoms (C–C or C–H), similarly to the electrons in the valence bond description. However, in benzene the remaining six bonding electrons are located in three π (pi) molecular bonding orbitals that are delocalized around the ring. Two of these electrons are in an MO that has equal orbital contributions from all six atoms. The other four electrons are in orbitals with vertical nodes at right angles to each other. As in the VB theory, all of these six delocalized π electrons reside in a larger space that exists above and below the ring plane. All carbon–carbon bonds in benzene are chemically equivalent. In MO theory this is a direct consequence of the fact that the three molecular π orbitals combine and evenly spread the extra six electrons over six carbon atoms. [[File:Benzene structure.png|thumbnail|Structure of benzene]] In molecules such as [[methane]], {{chem|C|H|4}}, the eight valence electrons are found in four MOs that are spread out over all five atoms. It is possible to transform the MOs into four localized sp<sup>3</sup> orbitals. Linus Pauling, in 1931, hybridized the carbon 2s and 2p orbitals so that they pointed directly at the [[hydrogen]] 1s basis functions and featured maximal overlap. However, the delocalized MO description is more appropriate for predicting [[ionization energy|ionization energies]] and the positions of spectral [[absorption band]]s. When methane is ionized, a single electron is taken from the valence MOs, which can come from the s bonding or the triply degenerate p bonding levels, yielding two ionization energies. In comparison, the explanation in [[valence bond theory]] is more complicated. When one electron is removed from an sp<sup>3</sup> orbital, [[resonance (chemistry)|resonance]] is invoked between four valence bond structures, each of which has a single one-electron bond and three two-electron bonds. Triply degenerate T<sub>2</sub> and A<sub>1</sub> ionized states (CH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) are produced from different linear combinations of these four structures. The difference in energy between the ionized and ground state gives the two ionization energies. As in benzene, in substances such as [[beta carotene]], [[chlorophyll]], or [[heme]], some electrons in the π orbitals are spread out in molecular orbitals over long distances in a molecule, resulting in light absorption in lower energies (the [[visible spectrum]]), which accounts for the characteristic colours of these substances.<ref name="Griffth 1957">Griffith, J.S. and L.E. Orgel. [http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1957/qr/qr9571100381#!divAbstract "Ligand Field Theory".] ''Q. Rev. Chem. Soc.'' 1957, 11, 381-383</ref> This and other spectroscopic data for molecules are well explained in MO theory, with an emphasis on electronic states associated with multicenter orbitals, including mixing of orbitals premised on principles of orbital symmetry matching.<ref name="Tarr 2013"/> The same MO principles also naturally explain some electrical phenomena, such as high [[electrical conductivity]] in the planar direction of the hexagonal atomic sheets that exist in [[graphite]]. This results from continuous band overlap of half-filled p orbitals and explains electrical conduction. MO theory recognizes that some electrons in the graphite atomic sheets are completely [[delocalized electron|delocalized]] over arbitrary distances, and reside in very large molecular orbitals that cover an entire graphite sheet, and some electrons are thus as free to move and therefore conduct electricity in the sheet plane, as if they resided in a metal. ==See also== {{Portal|Chemistry}} {{Div col}} *[[Cis effect]] *[[Configuration interaction]] *[[Coupled cluster]] *[[Frontier molecular orbital theory]] *[[Ligand field theory]] (MO theory for transition metal complexes) *[[Møller–Plesset perturbation theory]] *[[Quantum chemistry computer programs]] *[[Semi-empirical quantum chemistry methods]] *[[Valence bond theory]] {{Div col end}} ==References== {{Reflist|35em}} ==External links== *[http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch8/mo.html Molecular Orbital Theory] - Purdue University *[http://www.sparknotes.com/chemistry/bonding/molecularorbital/section1.html Molecular Orbital Theory] - Sparknotes *[http://www.mpcfaculty.net/mark_bishop/molecular_orbital_theory.htm Molecular Orbital Theory] - Mark Bishop's Chemistry Site *[https://web.archive.org/web/20080519101946/http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/software/download/mo/ Introduction to MO Theory] - Queen Mary, London University *[http://www.chm.davidson.edu/ChemistryApplets/MolecularOrbitals/index.html Molecular Orbital Theory] - a related terms table *[https://web.archive.org/web/20180920173546/http://vallance.chem.ox.ac.uk/pdfs/SymmetryLectureNotes2009.pdf An introduction to Molecular Group Theory] - Oxford University {{Chemical bonding theory}} {{Authority control}} [[Category:Chemical bonding]] [[Category:Chemistry theories]] [[Category:General chemistry]] [[Category:Quantum chemistry]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Authority control
(
edit
)
Template:Chem
(
edit
)
Template:Chemical bonding theory
(
edit
)
Template:Citation
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Cite press release
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Div col
(
edit
)
Template:Div col end
(
edit
)
Template:Electronic structure methods
(
edit
)
Template:More citations needed section
(
edit
)
Template:Portal
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Section link
(
edit
)
Template:See also
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Use American English
(
edit
)