Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Ninety–ninety rule
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Humorous aphorism in computer programming}} {{for|the American educational funding policy|90–10 rule}} {{refimprove|date=June 2017}} In [[computer programming]] and [[software engineering]], the '''ninety-ninety rule''' is a humorous [[aphorism]] that states: {{quote |text=<!-- PLEASE DON'T CHANGE THIS QUOTE WITHOUT CHECKING THE ORIGINAL SOURCE! THE %'S ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO TOTAL 100%! -->The first 90 percent of the code accounts for the first 90 percent of the development time. The remaining 10 percent of the code accounts for the other 90<!-- YES THIS TOTALS 180%! THIS IS NOT AN ERROR! --> percent of the development time.<ref name="Bentley1985">{{cite journal|last=Bentley|first=Jon|year=1985|title=Programming pearls: Bumper-Sticker Computer Science|journal=Communications of the ACM|volume=28|issue=9|pages=896–901|issn=0001-0782|doi=10.1145/4284.315122|s2cid=5832776|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Mantle2012">{{citation|title=Managing the unmanageable |first1=Mickey W.|last1=Mantle|first2=Ron|last2=Lichty|publisher=Addison Wesley|year=2012|isbn=978-0-321-82203-1|url=https://www.managingtheunmanageable.net/}}</ref> |sign=[[Tom Cargill]] |source=[[Bell Labs]]}} This adds up to 180%, making a wry allusion to the notoriety of software development projects significantly over-running their schedules (see [[software development effort estimation]]). The anecdote expresses both the rough allocation of time to easy and hard portions of a programming undertaking, and the cause of the lateness of many projects in their failure to anticipate their difficult, often unpredictable, complexities. In short, it often takes both more time and more coding than expected to complete a project. The rule is attributed to Tom Cargill of Bell Labs, and was made popular by [[Jon Bentley (computer scientist)|Jon Bentley]]'s September 1985 "Programming Pearls" column in ''[[Communications of the ACM]]'', in which it was titled the "Rule of Credibility".<ref name="Bentley1985"/> In some [[Agile software development|agile software projects]], this rule also surfaces when a task is portrayed as "relatively done." This indicates a common scenario where planned work is completed but cannot be signed off, pending a single final activity which may not occur for a substantial amount of time. ==See also== * {{annotated link|Hofstadter's law}} * {{annotated link|Lindy effect}} * {{annotated link|Pareto principle}} – the 80/20 rule * {{annotated link|Small matter of programming}} ==References== <references/> {{DEFAULTSORT:Ninety-Ninety Rule}} [[Category:Adages]] [[Category:Computer humour]] [[Category:Software project management]] [[Category:Programming principles]] [[Category:1985 introductions]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Annotated link
(
edit
)
Template:For
(
edit
)
Template:Quote
(
edit
)
Template:Refimprove
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)