Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Not invented here
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Management attitude for innovation or development}} {{Distinguish|Not invented there}} '''Not invented here''' ('''NIH''') is the tendency to avoid using or buying products, [[research]], standards, or knowledge from external origins. It is usually adopted by social, [[Corporate culture|corporate]], or institutional cultures. Research illustrates a strong bias against ideas from the outside.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Piezunka|first1=Henning|last2=Dahlander|first2=Linus|date=26 June 2014|title=Distant Search, Narrow Attention: How Crowding Alters Organizations' Filtering of Suggestions in Crowdsourcing|journal=Academy of Management Journal|volume=58|issue=3|pages=856–880|doi=10.5465/amj.2012.0458}}</ref> The reasons for not wanting to use the work of others are varied, but can include a desire to support a local economy instead of [[Royalty payment|paying royalties]] to a foreign [[license]]-holder, fear of [[patent infringement]], lack of understanding of the foreign work, an unwillingness to acknowledge or value the work of others, jealousy, [[belief perseverance]], or forming part of a wider [[wikt:turf war|turf war]].<ref>{{cite book|title=The Innovation Playbook: A Revolution in Business Excellence|last1=Webb|first1=Nicholas J.|last2=Thoen|first2=Chris|publisher=John Wiley and Sons|date=2010|isbn=978-0-470-63796-8}}</ref> As a social phenomenon, this tendency can manifest itself as an unwillingness to adopt an idea or product because it originates from another culture, a form of [[tribalism]]<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zociQR9kLm8C&pg=PA100|title=The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain|editor1-last=Floud|editor1-first=Roderick|editor2-last=Johnson|editor2-first=Paul|date=2003|publisher=Cambridge University Press|volume=3|page=100|isbn=9780521527385}}</ref> and/or an inadequate effort in choosing the right approach for the business.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2020/03/04/build-vs-buy-why-most-businesses-should-buy-their-next-software-solution/?sh=3717b9561128|title=Build Vs. Buy: Why Most Businesses Should Buy Their Next Software Solution|last=Hagler|first=Bo|magazine=Forbes|date=2020-03-04|access-date=2021-10-29}}</ref> The term is typically used in a [[pejorative]] sense. The opposite predisposition is sometimes called "proudly found elsewhere" (PFE)<ref>{{cite web|last1=Huston|first1=Larry|last2=Sakkab|first2=Nabil|date=2006-03-20|url=https://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/pg-s-new-innovation-model|title=P&G's New Innovation Model|website=hbswk.hbs.edu|access-date=2020-04-18}}</ref> or "invented elsewhere". == Scientific study == A 1982 study by Ralph Katz and [[Thomas J. Allen]] provides empirical evidence for the "not invented here" syndrome, showing that the performance of R&D project groups declines after about five years, which they attribute to the groups becoming increasingly insular and communicating less with key information sources outside the group.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Katz |first=Ralph |last2=Allen |first2=Thomas J. |date=January 1982 |title=Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x |journal=R&D Management |language=en |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=7–20 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x |issn=0033-6807|url-access=subscription }}</ref> == See also == {{columns-list|colwidth=20em| * [[Anti-pattern]] * [[Appeal to spite]] * [[Association fallacy]] * [[De facto standard|''De facto'' standard]] * [[Dogfooding]] * [[Editor wars]] * [[Endowment effect]]{{snd}}ascribing higher value to what is one's own * [[Ethnocentrism]] * [[Galápagos syndrome]] * [[Genetic fallacy]] * [[Groupthink]] * [[IKEA effect]] * [[In-group favoritism]] * [[Invented here]]{{snd}}opposite. Not invented there (NIT) * [[List of cognitive biases]] * [[Protectionism]] * [[Reinventing the wheel]] * [[Wishful thinking]] * [[Xenophobia]] * [[You aren't gonna need it]] (YAGNI) }} == References == {{Reflist}} {{Fallacies}} [[Category:Appeals to emotion]] [[Category:Economics of intellectual property]] [[Category:Cognitive biases]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Cite magazine
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Columns-list
(
edit
)
Template:Distinguish
(
edit
)
Template:Fallacies
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)