Editing Obligation

{{Short description|Course of action someone must take}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2025}}
An '''obligation''' is a course of action which someone is required to take, be it a [[legal obligation]] or a [[moral obligation]].  Obligations are constraints; they limit [[freedom]]. People who are under obligations may choose to freely act under obligations. Obligation exists when there is a choice to do what is morally good and what is morally unacceptable.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Obligation, a social theory|last=Ross|first=Ralph|publisher=Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press|year=1970|isbn=0472087657|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/obligationsocial0000ross}}</ref> There are also obligations in other normative contexts, such as obligations of [[etiquette]], [[social]] obligations, [[religious]], and possibly in terms of [[politics]], where obligations are requirements which must be fulfilled. These are generally [[legal]] obligations, which can incur a penalty for non-fulfilment, although certain people are obliged to carry out certain actions for other reasons as well, whether as a [[tradition]] or for social reasons.

Obligations vary from person to person: for example, a person holding a political office will generally have far more obligations than an average adult citizen, who themselves will have more obligations than a child.<ref>Old Bear, ''Sacred Journey of the Medicine Wheel'' (2008), p. 393: "Adults have more obligations and are held to higher standards of accountability than children are".</ref> Obligations are generally granted in return for an increase in an individual's rights or power.

==Other uses==
The term obligate can also be used in a biological context, in reference to species which must occupy a certain niche or behave in a certain way in order to survive. In biology, the opposite of obligate is [[WIKT:facultative|facultative]], meaning that a species is able to behave in a certain way and may do so under certain circumstances, but that it can also survive without having to behave this way. For example, species of salamanders in the family [[Proteidae]] are obligate [[paedomorphs]], whereas species belonging to the [[Ambystomatidae]] are facultative paedomorphs.

In finance, "obligated" refers to funds within authorised budgets which have become legally binding expenditure commitments e.g. through letting a contract.<ref>[[Congressional Budget Office]], [https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57660 Common Budgetary Terms Explained], published December 2021, accessed 30 November 2023</ref>

In the Catholic Church, [[Holy Days of Obligation]] or Holidays of Obligation, less commonly called Feasts of Precept, are the days on which, as canon 1247 of the [[1983 Code of Canon Law]] states, the faithful are obliged to participate in the [[Mass (Catholic Church)|Mass]].

== Obligation and morality ==
{{See also|Moral imperative|Obligation-based ethics}}
An obligation is  contract between an individual and the thing or person to which or whom they are obligated. If the contract is breached the individual can be subject to blame. When entering into an obligation people generally do not think about the guilt that they would experience if the obligation were not fulfilled; instead they think about how they can fulfil the obligation. Rationalists argue people respond in this way because they have a reason to fulfill the obligation.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|url=https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691500.001.0001/acprof-9780199691500-chapter-4|title=Obligation|last=Owens|first=David|date=20 September 2012|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780191744938|language=en-US|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691500.001.0001}}</ref> According to the sanction theory, an obligation corresponds to the social pressures one feels, and is not simply derived from a singular relationship with another person or project. In the rationalist argument, this same pressure adds to the reasons people have, thereby strengthening their desire to fulfill the obligation. The sanction theory states there needs to be a sanction in order for a duty to be a moral duty.<ref name=":0" />

== Sociological view versus philosophical view ==
Sociologists believe that obligations lead people to act in ways that society deems acceptable. Every society has their own way of governing, they expect their citizens to behave in a particular manner. Not only do the citizens have to oblige to the societal norms, they want to, in order to assimilate to society.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Ogien|first=Albert|date=1 December 2016|title=Obligation and Impersonality: Wittgenstein and the Nature of the Social|journal=Philosophy of the Social Sciences|language=en|volume=46|issue=6|pages=604–623|doi=10.1177/0048393116649970|s2cid=147711448 |issn=0048-3931}}</ref> Some philosophers on the other hand, argue that rational beings have moral duties, they make a choice to either fulfill these moral duties or disregard them. They have a [[moral responsibility]] to fulfill their obligations. [[Duty]] is seen as the response to an individual's obligations. Obligations require an action being done and duty is the carrying out of this action.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Korsgaard|first=Christine|date=July 1989|title=Kant's Analysis of Obligation: The Argument of Foundations|journal=The Monist|volume=72|pages=311–340|doi=10.5840/monist198972317}}</ref> Sociologists believe that an obligation is an objective force. Some philosophers however, believe obligations are moral imperatives.<ref name=":1" />

== Types==

=== Written ===
Written obligations are [[contract]]s. They legally bind two people into an agreement. Each person becomes responsible for doing their part of the contract. A legal contract, which does not need to be made in writing,<ref>Ramesh, A., [https://lawpath.com.au/blog/do-contracts-have-to-be-in-writing Do Contracts Have to Be In Writing?], published 20 June 2019, accessed 9 August 2023</ref> consists of an [[Offer and acceptance|offer]], an acceptance of that offer, an intention to bind to one another in a legal agreement and a [[consideration]], something of value to be exchanged.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.smallbusiness.wa.gov.au/business-advice/legal-essentials/contracts-and-agreements|title=Contracts and agreements {{!}} Small Business|website=www.smallbusiness.wa.gov.au|language=en|access-date=27 November 2019}}</ref>

===Political ===
A political obligation is a requirement for the citizens of a society to follow the laws of that society.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Song|first=Edward|date=2012|title=Acceptance, Fairness, and Political Obligation|journal=Legal Theory|volume=18|issue=2 |pages=209–229 |doi=10.1017/S1352325212000067 |s2cid=145252321 |url=https://philarchive.org/rec/SONAFA }}</ref> There are philosophical issues, however, about whether a citizen should follow a law simply because it is a law. There are various views about whether a political obligation is a moral obligation. [[John Rawls]]  argues that people do have political obligations because of the ''principle of fairness''. Humanity benefits from the joint effort of the government, so, in fairness, they should be active and supportive members of this effort.<ref name=":2" /> There are people, however, such as [[Robert Nozick]], who argue enjoyment of a community effort does not mean obligation to that effort.<ref name=":2" />

=== Social ===
Social obligations refer to the things humans as individuals accept because it is collectively accepted.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last=Miller|first=Kaarlo|date=1 June 2006|title=Social obligation as reason for action|journal=Cognitive Systems Research|series=Cognition, Joint Action and Collective Intentionality|volume=7|issue=2|pages=273–285|doi=10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.11.005|s2cid=3449678 |issn=1389-0417}}</ref> When people agree to a promise or an agreement, they are collectively consenting to its terms. Humanity is obligated to fulfil that promise or agreement.<ref name=":3" />

===Special===
Special obligations are those obligations owed to a particular subset of persons, such as family members, friends, and possibly fellow citizens,<ref>{{cite SEP|title=Special Obligations|author-last=Jeske|author-first=Diane|edition=Winter 2021}}</ref> entered into either voluntarily (such as through marriage) or otherwise.<ref>Jeske, D., [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-philosophy/article/abs/families-friends-and-special-obligations/0293CEAF58750B9924A79BF4EEB026DE Families, Friends, and Special Obligations], ''Canadian Journal of Philosophy'', Volume 28 Issue 4, 2020, accessed on 25 April 2025</ref>

===Primary and secondary ===
[[English law]] distinguishes in some case law between primary and secondary obligations. A secondary obligation, also known as an accessory obligation, is a duty that is incidental to a primary obligation.<ref>{{cite book |editor1-last=Garner |editor1-first=Bryan A. |title=Black's law dictionary |date=2009 |publisher=West |location=St. Paul, MN |isbn=978-0314199492 |page=1180 |edition=9th}}</ref> A duty to perform a secondary obligation may result, for example, as a result of their [[breach of contract|breach]] of a primary obligation, or by another party breaching an obligation that the secondary obligor has [[guarantee]]d.

The [[England and Wales Court of Appeal]] noted in the case of AB v CD (2014) that{{blockquote|The primary obligation of the party to a contract [is] to perform his contractual obligations. The obligation to pay [[damages]] in the event of breach is a secondary obligation.<ref>Blake, N., [https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2014/03/11/court-of-appeal-decision-means-injunction-to-prevent-breach-may-be-more-readily-obtained-where-damages-limited-by-contract/ Court of Appeal decision means injunction to prevent breach may be more readily obtained where damages limited by contract], ''Herbert Smith Freehills'': Litigation Notes, published 11 March 2014, accessed 7 February 2023</ref><ref>England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), [https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/229.html AB v CD (2014) EWCA Civ 229], paragraph 22, published 6 March 2014, accessed 2 February 2023</ref>}} and in relation to the [[Statute of Frauds]], [[Maurice Kay|Lord Justice Maurice Kay]] commented in 2009 that{{blockquote|A guarantee is, in the words of the Statute, a promise "to answer for the debt default or miscarriage of another person". There must be another person who is primarily liable. The liability of the guarantor is secondary.<ref>England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), [https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/189.html Associated British Ports v Ferryways NV & Anor], EWCA Civ 189, 18 March 2009, accessed 18 February 2023</ref>}}

The Appeal Court observed in 1973 that the determination of whether a document is a guarantee or an indemnity, or whether it imposes a secondary or a primary liability, will always depend upon "the true [[judicial interpretation|construction]] of the actual words in which the promise is expressed".<ref>Swarbrick, D., [https://swarb.co.uk/lep-air-services-v-rolloswin-investments-ltd-moschi-v-lep-air-services-hl-1973/ Lep Air Services v Rolloswin Investments Ltd; Moschi v LEP Air Services: HL 1973], updated 6 May 2022, accessed 18 February 2023</ref>

Under the [[Louisiana Civil Code]], "stipulated damages" create a secondary obligation for the purpose of enforcing a principal obligation. An aggrieved party may demand either the stipulated damages or the performance of the principal obligation, but may not demand both except for delay.<ref>Louisiana Civil Code, [http://legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?d=109263 Article 2007], accessed 23 June 2015</ref>

==See also==
* [[Ability]]
* [[Convention (norm)|Convention]]
* [[Duty]]
* [[Law of obligations]]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==External links==
{{Wikiquote}}
*{{cite IEP |url-id=poli-obl |title=Political Obligation}}

{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Philosophy of law]]
[[Category:Concepts in ethics]]
[[Category:Philosophy of life]]