Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Partisan game
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
In [[combinatorial game theory]], a game is '''partisan''' (sometimes '''partizan''') if it is not [[impartial game|impartial]]. That is, some moves are available to one player and not to the other, or the payoffs are not symmetric.<ref>{{citation|title=Winning ways for your mathematical plays, Volume 1: Games in general|page=17|first1=Elwyn R.|last1=Berlekamp|author1-link=Elwyn Berlekamp|first2=John H.|last2=Conway|author2-link=John H. Conway|first3=Richard K.|last3=Guy|author3-link=Richard K. Guy|publisher=Academic Press|year=1982}}. Berlekamp et al. use the alternative spelling "partizan".</ref> Most games are partisan. For example, in [[chess]], only one player can move the white pieces. More strongly, when analyzed using combinatorial game theory, many chess positions have values that cannot be expressed as the value of an impartial game, for instance when one side has a number of extra tempos that can be used to put the other side into [[zugzwang]].<ref>{{citation | last = Elkies | first = Noam D.|authorlink = Noam D. Elkies | contribution = On numbers and endgames: combinatorial game theory in chess endgames | location = Cambridge | mr = 1427963 | pages = 135–150 | publisher = Cambridge Univ. Press | series = Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. | title = Games of no chance (Berkeley, CA, 1994) | volume = 29 | year = 1996}}.</ref> Partisan games are more difficult to analyze than [[impartial game]]s, as the [[Sprague–Grundy theorem]] does not apply.<ref>That is, not every position in a partisan game can have a [[nimber]] as its value, or else the game would be impartial. However, some nimbers can still occur as the values of game positions; see e.g. {{citation | last = dos Santos | first = Carlos Pereira | doi = 10.1016/j.dam.2010.11.019 | issue = 8 | journal = Discrete Applied Mathematics | mr = 2782625 | pages = 675–682 | title = Embedding processes in combinatorial game theory | volume = 159 | year = 2011| doi-access = free }}.</ref> However, the application of combinatorial game theory to partisan games allows the significance of ''numbers as games'' to be seen, in a way that is not possible with impartial games.<ref>{{citation|title=On numbers and games|first=J. H.|last=Conway|authorlink=John H. Conway|publisher=Academic Press|year=1976}}.</ref> ==References== {{reflist}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Partisan Game}} [[Category:Combinatorial game theory]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Citation
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)