Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Polysyllogism
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Sequence of propositions which constitute a sequence of overlapping syllogisms}} A '''polysyllogism''' is a complex argument (also known as ''chain arguments'' of which there are four kinds: '''polysyllogisms''', '''sorites''', '''epicheirema''', and '''dilemmas''')<ref>{{cite book|url=https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1665759.Traditional_Logic_II|author=Martin Cothran|title=Traditional Logic II|pages=63|year=2017|publisher=[[Memoria Press]]}}</ref> that strings together any number of [[proposition]]s forming together a sequence of [[syllogism]]s such that the conclusion of each syllogism, together with the next proposition, is a premise for the next, and so on. Each constituent syllogism is called a '''prosyllogism''' except the last, because the conclusion of the last syllogism is not a premise for another syllogism. == Example == An example of a categorical polysyllogism is: :All good students will readily understand polysyllogisms :All students of logic are good students :Therefore, all students of logic will readily understand polysyllogisms :But all people who read this web page are students of logic :Therefore, all people who read this web page will readily understand polysyllogisms This argument has the following structure: :All A is B :All C is A :Therefore: all C is B :All D is C :Therefore, all D is B Note two points: first, the makeup of a polysyllogism need not be limited to two component syllogisms. In fact, it can have any number of component syllogisms. Second, validity depends on all its parts. If any one is not valid then the whole polysyllogism is to be considered invalid.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1665759.Traditional_Logic_II|author=Martin Cothran|title=Traditional Logic II|pages=64|year=2017|publisher=[[Memoria Press]]}}</ref> An example for a [[propositional]] polysyllogism is: :It is raining. :If we go out while it is raining we will get wet. :If we get wet, we will get cold. :Therefore, if we go out we will get cold. Examination of the structure of the argument reveals the following sequence of constituent (pro)syllogisms: :It is raining. :If we go out while it is raining we will get wet. :Therefore, if we go out we will get wet. :If we go out we will get wet. :If we get wet, we will get cold. :Therefore, if we go out we will get cold. == Sorites == {{wikt | sorites}} A '''sorites''' (plural: sorites) is a specific kind of polysyllogism in which the predicate of each proposition is the subject of the next premise. Example: :All lions are big cats. :All big cats are predators. :All predators are carnivores. :Therefore, all lions are carnivores. The word ''sorites'' {{IPAc-en|s|ɒ|ˈ|r|aɪ|t|iː|z}} comes from {{Langx|grc|σωρίτης}}, ''heaped up'', from σωρός ''heap'' or ''pile''. Thus a sorites is a heap of propositions chained together. A sorites polysyllogism should not be confused with the [[sorites paradox]], a.k.a. the fallacy of the heap. [[Lewis Carroll]] uses sorites in his book ''Symbolic Logic'' (1896). For example:<ref>{{cite book|url=https://www.gutenberg.org/files/28696/28696-h/28696-h.htm|author=Lewis Carroll|title=Symbolic Logic|pages=113|year=1897|publisher=[[Project Gutenberg]]}}</ref> :No experienced person is incompetent; :Jenkins is always blundering; :No competent person is always blundering. :Jenkins is inexperienced. Carroll's example may be translated thus: :All experienced persons are competent persons. :No competent persons are blunderers. :Jenkins is a blunderer. :Jenkins is not an experienced person. == See also == * [[Anadiplosis]] - the rhetorical grounds of polysyllogism. * [[Philosophical realism]] * [[Transitive relation]] * [[Syllogism#Other types|Type of syllogism (disjunctive, hypothetical, legal, poly-, prosleptic, quasi-, statistical)]] ==Notes== <references /> ==Bibliography== * {{cite book |title=An Introduction to Syllogistic Logic | page=342 | author=B. P. Bairan | publisher=Goodwill Trading | isbn=971-574-094-4 }} * {{cite book |title=Traditional Logic II:Advanced Formal Logic | page=342 | author=M. Cothran | publisher=Memoria Press | isbn=978-1-61538-874-5 }} * {{cite book |title=Formal Logic | page=253 | author=J. Maritain | publisher=Sheed & Ward | ASIN=B0007F0HL0 }} {{Authority control}} [[Category:Term logic]] [[Category:Syllogism]] {{Logic-stub}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page
(
help
)
:
Template:Authority control
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:IPAc-en
(
edit
)
Template:Langx
(
edit
)
Template:Logic-stub
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Wikt
(
edit
)